El “Interactive Research Methods Lab”Un Hub para la promoción del Cambio Educativo basado en la equidad metodológica

  1. Jorrín Abellán, Iván 1
  1. 1 Kennesaw State University
    info

    Kennesaw State University

    Kennesaw, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/00jeqjx33

Revista:
Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1575-0965

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Laboratorios de investigación en el aula: principios y modelos educativos basados en la evidencia

Volumen: 26

Número: 2

Páginas: 1-16

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/REIFOP.558951 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En este artículo presentamos el Interactive Research Methods Lab como lugar de encuentro que facilita un modelo de empoderamiento y emancipación que conduce a la promoción del cambio educativo basado en un enfoque emergente de equidad metodológica. Describimos los orígenes, la evolución y las iniciativas clave de este innovador espacio físico y virtual en el Bagwell College of Education (Kennesaw State University) que desafía los enfoques tradicionales de enseñanza-aprendizaje de métodos de investigación, promoviendo el desarrollo de una cultura de investigación crítica entre los maestros/as tanto en activo como en formación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Banks, C.A., & Banks, J.A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 152-158.
  • Breuer, F. & Schreier, M. (2007). Issues in learning about and teaching qualitative research methods and methodology in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 8(1).
  • Bruce, B. C. (2009). Building an Airplane in the Air: The Life of the Inquiry Group. In B. Drayton & J. Falks (eds.), Creating and facilitating effective on-line professional development for educators. New York: Teachers College Press
  • Cooper, R., Fleischer, A., & Cotton, F. A. (2012). Building Connections: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Qualitative Research Students’ Learning Experiences. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 1-16. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss17/1
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
  • European Commission (2016). Open innovation, open Science, open to the world: A vision for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. doi:10.2777/061652
  • Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-26.
  • Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the Teachers: Effective Professional Development in an Era of High Stakes Accountability. Center for Public Education. Center for Public Education. Retrieved from: http://conference.ohioschoolboards.org/2017/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2016/07/1pm111317A114Job-embedPD.pdf
  • Günter, M. (2008). A lesson learned? Difficulties in teaching and learning qualitative research methods. Journal Für Psychologie, 1(5).
  • Lesko, N., Simmons, J.A., Quarshie, A., & Newton, N. (2008). The Pedagogy of Monsters: Scary Disturbances in a Doctoral Research Preparation Course. Teachers College Record, 110 (8), 1541-1573. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15152
  • Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
  • Mitchell, L.S. (1931). A cooperative school for student teachers. Progressive Education, 8. 251-255.
  • Mulholland, R., McKinlay, A., & Sproule, J. (2017). Teachers in need of space: The content and changing context of work. Educational Review, 69 (2), 181-200. 10.1080/00131911.2016.1184131
  • Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A. & Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Martínez-Monés, A., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Coming Down to Earth: Helping Teachers Use 3D Virtual Worlds in Across-Spaces Learning Situations. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (1), 13–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.1.13
  • Muñoz-Cristóbal, J., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Asensio-Pérez, J., Martínez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Supporting Teacher Orchestration in Ubiquitous Learning Environments: A Study in Primary Education. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 8(1), 83-97. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2014.2370634
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I.M. (2021) Hopscotch 4-Teachers (Version 1.0) [Web tool]. https://hopscotchmodel.com/4-teachers/
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I.M. (2021b, October 7). Playing Hopscotch to Generate Well-Informed SoTL Research Designs. [Plenary Workshop]. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Summit. Atlanta, Georgia. https://facultydevelopment.kennesaw.edu/sotlsummit/
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I.M. & Steiner, H. (2021) Hopscotch 4-SoTL (Version 1.0) [Web tool]. https://hopscotchmodel.com/4-sotl/
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Fontana Abad, M., & Rubia Avi, B. (2021). Investigar en educación. Síntesis.
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Vasquez, A., & Gaines, R. E. (2020). Co-designing Research Methods Lesson Plans in the Interactive Research Methods Lab. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (74), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1797
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I.M. (2019). Rayuela 2.0: Una herramienta para promocionar la labor innovadora de maestros y maestras mediante la generación de diseños de investigación rigurosos. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 18 (1), 23-39. (view)
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I. M. (2019). Hopscotch 2.0: an enhanced version of the Model for the Generation of Research Designs in Social Sciences and Education. Georgia Educational Researcher, 16 (1). DOI: 10.20429/ger.2019.160103
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I. M. (2016). Hopscotch Building: A Model for the Generation of Qualitative Research Designs. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(1) DOI: 10.20429/ger.2016.130104.
  • Jorrin-Abellán, I.M. (2012) Perfil Formativo generado en los entornos CSCL: Un Estudio de Caso. Editorial Académica Española, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2012. (Doctoral Dissertation)
  • Poole, G. (2013). Square one: What is research? In K. McKinney (Ed.) The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Post, T. (2021). Teacher Experiences with Multiple One-to-One Technology Integration Models: A Phenomenography. Doctor of Education in Instructional Technology Dissertations. 10. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/instruceddoc_etd/10
  • Ratnam, T. (2020) Provocation to Dialog in a Third Space: Helping Teachers Walk Toward Equity Pedagogy. Frontiers in Education. 5:569018. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.569018
  • Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How things work. New York: The Guilford Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet