Evaluación de las habilidades sociales en adultos con discapacidad intelectualcalibración de la escala SPSS-R mediante el modelo de Rasch

Bibliographic References

• Abad, F. J., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V. y García, C. (2011). Medición en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
• Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
• Ayala, L. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. Nueva York, NY: Guilford.
• Bellack, A. S. (1983). Recurrent problems in the behavioral assessment of social skill. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 21, 29-41.
• Bielecki, J. y Swender, S. L. (2004). The assessment of social functioning in individuals with mental retardation: a review. Behavior Modification, 28, 694-708.
• Bond, T. G. y Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
• Caballo, V. E. (1993). Manual de evaluación y entrenamiento de las habilidades sociales. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Crocker, L. y Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
• Embretson, S. E. y Hershberger, S. L. (1999). The new rules of measurement. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
• Embretson, S. E. y McCollam, K. M. S. (2000). Psychometric approaches to understanding and measuring intelligence. En R. J. Sternberg (dir.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 423-444). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Embretson, S. E. y Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
• Fidalgo, A. M. (2005). Enfoque de la teoría de respuesta a los ítems. En J. Muñiz, A. M. Fidalgo, E. García-Cueto, R. Martínez y R. Moreno (dirs.), Análisis de los ítems (pp. 79131). Madrid: La Muralla.
• Gómez, L. E., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B. y Arias, V. (2010). A comparison of alternative models of individual quality of life for social service recipients. Social Indicators Research, 101, 109-126.
• Gómez, L. E., Verdugo, M. A. y Arias, B. (2010). Calidad de vida individual: avances en su conceptualización y retos emergentes en el ámbito de la discapacidad. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 18, 453-472.
• Gómez, L. E., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B, Irurtia, M. J. (2011). Evaluación de los derechos de las personas con discapacidad intelectual: estudio preliminar. Behavior Psychology/ Psicología Conductual, 19, 207-222.
• Gresham, F. M. y Elliot, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System: manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, J. y Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• International Test Commission (2006, julio). The ITC 5th International Conference on Psychological and Educational Test Adaptation across Language and Cultures. Bruselas, Bélgica.
• Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A. y Rojahn, J. (dirs.) (2007). Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities. Nueva York, NY: Springer.
• La Greca, A. M., Stone, W. L., Bell, D. J. y Charles, R. (1982). Assessing the problematic interpersonal skills of mentally retarded individuals in a vocational setting. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 3, 37-53.
• Lecavalier, L. y Butter, E. M. (2010). Assesment of social skills and intellectual disability. En D. W. Nangle, D. J. Hansen, C. A. Erdley y P. J. Norton, (dirs.), Practitioner's guide to empirically based measures of social skills (pp.179-190). Nueva York, NY: Springer.
• Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 103-122.
• Linacre, J. M. (2014). WINSTEPS: Rasch measurement computer program. Recuperado de http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm.
• Linacre, J. M. (2008). A user's guide to WINSTEPS-MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago. Dipsonible en: www.winsteps.com.
• Linacre, J. M. y Wright, B. D. (1999). WINSTEPS: Multiple choice, rating scale, and partial credit Rasch analysis [Programa informático]. Chicago: MESA.
• Lorenzo-Seva, U. y Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 88-91.
• Lowe, M. R. y Cautela, R. (1978). A self-report measure of social skills. Behavior Therapy, 9, 535-544.
• Matson, J. L. (1995). The Matson Evaluation of Social Skills for Individuals with Severe Retardation. Baton Rouge, LA: Scientific Publishers.
• Matson, J. L. y Swiezy, N. (1994). Social skills training with autistic children. En J. L. Matson (dir.), Autism in children and adults: etiology, assessment, and intervention (pp. 241-260). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Matson, J. L., Helsel, W. J., Bellack, A. S. y Senatore, V. (1983). Development of a rating scale to assess social skills deficits in mentally retarded adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 399-407.
• Matson, J. L., Rotari, A. F. y Helsel, W. J. (1983). Development of a rating scale to measure social skills in children: the Matson Evaluation of Social Skills in Youths (MESSY). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 335-340.
• Meyer, L. H., Reichle, J., McQuarter, R., Cole, D. A., Vandercook, T., Evans, I., Neel, R. Y., Kishi, G. (1985). Assessment of Social Competence (ASC): a scale of social competence functions (revised). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
• Muñiz, J., Elosua, P. y Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25, 151-157.
• Nangle, D. W., Hansen, D. J., Erdley, C. A. y Norton, P. J. (2010). Practitioner's guide to empirically based measures of social skills. Nueva York, NY: Springer.
• Preacher, K. J. y McCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analisys machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.
• Prieto, G. y Delgado, A. R. (1999). Medición cognitiva de las aptitudes. En J. Olea, V. Ponsoda y G. Prieto (dirs.), Tests informatizados: fundamentos y aplicaciones (pp. 207-226). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Prieto, G. y Delgado, A. R. (2000) Utilidad y representación en la psicometría actual. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2, 111-127.
• Prieto, G. y Delgado, A. R. (2003) Análisis de un test mediante el modelo de Rasch. Psicothema, 15, 94-100.
• Prieto, G. y Dias, A. (2004). Uso del modelo de Rasch para poner en la misma escala las puntuaciones de distintos tests. Actualidades en Psicología, 19, 5-23.
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: MESA Press.
• Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity: an attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. En M. Blegvad (dir.), The Danish yearbook of philosophy (pp. 58-94). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
• Schalock, R. L., Bonham, G. S. y Verdugo, M. A. (2008). Quality of life conceptual and measurement frameworks: from concept to application in the field of intellectual disabilities. Evaluation y Program Planning, 31, 181-190.
• Schalock, R. L., Keith, K. D., Verdugo, M. A. y Gómez, L. E. (2010). Quality of life model development in the field of intellectual disability. En R. Kober (dir.), Enhancing quality of life for people with intellectual disability: from theory to practice (pp. 17-32). Nueva York, NY: Springer.
• Schalock, R. L. y Verdugo, M. A. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
• Schalock, R. L. y Verdugo, M. A. (2007). El concepto de calidad de vida en los servicios y apoyos para personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero, 38, 21-36.
• Schalock, R. L. y Verdugo, M. A. (2012a). A leadership guide for today's disabilities organizations: overcoming challenges and making change happen. Baltimore: Brookes.
• Schalock, R. L. y Verdugo, M. A. (2012b). A conceptual and measurement framework to guide policy development and systems change. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 71-81.
• Timmerman, M. E. y Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220.
• Van de Vijver, F. y Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
• Wright, B. D. y Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA.
• Wright, B. D. y Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA.