El estudio del comportamiento humano de seguridad en organizaciones de alta fiabilidadel caso de la industria nuclear

  1. Mario Martínez-Córcoles
  2. Francisco Javier Gracia Lerín
  3. José María Peiró Silla
Revista:
Papeles del psicólogo

ISSN: 0214-7823,  1886-1415

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 39

Número: 3

Páginas: 183-190

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.23923/PAP.PSICOL2018.2869 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles del psicólogo

Resumen

En las últimas décadas, el estudio de la seguridad en organizaciones de alta fiabilidad no ha prestado la suficiente atención al papel de las personas y su contribución a una operación fiable. Debido a ello, la literatura sobre comportamiento humano de seguridad es escasa e inconexa. El presente trabajo integra el conocimiento existente sobre las personas y su comportamiento de seguridad en industrias de alta fiabilidad, más específicamente en la industria nuclear. Para tal fin, se proporciona una revisión de la literatura donde se acota y clarifica el concepto de “desempeño de seguridad”, y al mismo tiempo se presentan las últimas investigaciones y modelos sobre el mismo

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmidt, W.C. Borman, A. Howard, A. Kraut, D. Ilgen, B. Schneider & S. Zedeck. (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp.71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Burke, M.J., Sarpy, S.A., Tesluk, P.E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55, 429-457.
  • Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., & Burke, M.J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127.
  • Dien, Y. (1998). Safety and application of procedures, or how do ‘they’ have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants? Safety Science, 29(3), 179-188.
  • Frischknecht, A. (2005). A changing world: Challenges to nuclear operators and regulators. In N. Itoigawa, B. Wilpert & B. Fahlbruch. (Eds.), Emerging demands for the safety of nuclear power operations (pp.5-15). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Gauthereau, V., & Hollnagel, E. (2005). Planning, control, and adaptation: A case study. European Management Journal, 23(1), 118–131.
  • Griffin, R.W., & Lopez, Y.P. (2005). “Bad behavior” in organizations: A review and typology for future research. Journal of Management, 31(6), 988-1005.
  • Griffin, M.A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347–358.
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2002). Strategies to promote safe behaviors as part of a health and safety management system. Suffol, England: HSE Books.
  • Hendrick, H.W. (1991). Human factors in organizational design and management. Ergonomics, 34, 743–756.
  • Hollnagel, E. (1993). Human reliability analysis: Context and control. London: Harcourt Brace.
  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., & Leveson, N.C. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (1991). Safety culture, safety series No. 75-INSAG-4. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
  • International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (1988). Summary report on the post-accident review meeting on the Chernobyl accident. Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-1. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
  • International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. (2002). Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture. INSAG-15. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
  • Itoigawa, N., & Wilpert, B. (2005). Introduction: Nuclear Industry in a New Environment. In N. Itoigawa, B. Wilpert & B. Fahlbruch. (Eds.), Emerging demands for the safety of nuclear power operations (pp.99-108). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • La Porte, T. (1996). High reliability organisations: Unlikely, demanding and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 60-71.
  • Leveson, N.G. (2004). New accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270.
  • Martínez-Córcoles, M. (2017). High reliability leadership: A conceptual framework. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 00, 1–10.
  • Martínez-Córcoles, M., Gracia, F.J., Tomás, I., & Peiró, J.M., (2014). Strengthening safety compliance in nuclear power operations: a role-based approach. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 57–69.
  • Martínez-Córcoles, M., Gracia, F.J., Tomás, I., Peiró, J.M., & Schöbel, M., (2013). Empowering team leadership and safety performance in nuclear power plants: a multilevel approach. Safety Science, 51, 293–301.
  • Martínez-Córcoles, M., & Stephanou, K. (2017). Linking transactional leadership and safety performance in military operations. Safety Science, 96, 93–101.
  • Motowidlo, S.J., & Van Scotter, J.R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
  • Naevestad, T.O. (2008). Safety cultural preconditions for organizational learning in high-risk organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(3), 154-163.
  • Park J., & Jung W. (2003). The operators’ non-compliance behavior to conduct emergency operating procedures comparing with the work experience and the complexity of procedural steps. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 82(2), 115-131.
  • Parker, S.K., & Turner, N. (2002). Work design and individual job performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry: In S. Sonnentag. (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance: A handbook in the psychology of management in organizations (pp.69-94). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press. Reason, J. (2008). The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Farnham, UK: Ashgate. Richter, A. (2003). New ways of managing prevention: A cultural and participative approach. Safety Science Monitor, 7(1), 1-10.
  • Roberts, K. (1990). Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organisation Science, 1(2), 160-176.
  • Roberts, K. (1993). Cultural characteristics of reliability organisations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 5(2), 165-181.
  • Rochlin, G. (1993). Defining “high reliability” organisations in practice: A taxonomic prologue: In K. Roberts (Ed.), New challenges to understanding organisations, (pp.11-32). New York: Macmillan.
  • Robinson, S., & Bennett, R. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multi-dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-72.
  • Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P.R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66-80.
  • Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., & Parks, J.M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.215-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Wahlström, B. (2005). Challenges in the nuclear industry: Perspectives from senior managers and safety experts. In N. Itoigawa, B. Wilpert & B. Fahlbruch. (Eds.), Emerging demands for the safety of nuclear power operations (pp.17-29). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Weick, K., & Sutcliffe, K. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Wilpert, B. (2007). Psychology and design process. Safety Science, 45(1-2), 293-303.
  • Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596.
  • Zohar, D. (2002). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 75–92.
  • Zohar, D. (2008). Safety climate and beyond: a multi-level multi-climate framework. Safety Science, 46, 376–387.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet