Persuasive nature of image schematic devices in advertisingtheir use for introducing sexisms

Bibliographic References

• Andren, Gunnar, Lars Ericsson, Ragnar Ohlsson, and Torbjörn Tännsjö. (1978): Rhetoric and Ideology in Advertising (A Content Analytical Study of American Advertising). Stockholm: LiberFörlag.
• Ang, Swee Hoon, and Elison A. C. Lim. (2006): “The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes.” Journal of Advertising 35: 39-53.
• Bhatia, Vijay K. (1992): “Discourse functions and pragmatics of mixing: advertising across cultures.” World Englishes 11(2/3): 195-215.
• Barcelona, Antonio. (2000): “Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy.” In A. Barcelona, ed., Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [Topics in English Linguistics 30]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-28.
• Bencherif, S., and Keiko Tanaka. (1987): “Covert forms of communication.” Paper given at the Autumn Meeting of the Linguistic Association of Great Britain. Bradford, September.
• Borchers, Timothy A. (2nd ed.) (2002 [2005]): Persuasion in the Media Age. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Caillat, Zahna, and Barbara Mueller. (1996): “Observations: the influence of culture on American and British advertising: an exploratory comparison of beer advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 36(3): 79-88.
• Cheng, H., and John Schweitzer. (1996): “Cultural values reflected in Chinese and U.S. television commercials.” Journal of Advertising Research 36(3): 27-44.
• Cortés de los Ríos, Mª Enriqueta. (2001): Nuevas perspectivas lingüísticas en la publicidad impresa anglosajona. Almería: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Almería.
• Crook, John. (2004): “On covert communication in advertising.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (4): 715-738.
• Delbecque, Nicole. (1990): “El lenguaje de la publicidad y su poder de sugestión. Anuncios publicitarios en El País Semanal: Los tópicos más frecuentes y su formulación.” Lingüística española actual XII, Madrid: 197-214.
• Díaz Pérez, Francisco Javier. (1999): “Una aproximación al uso de la metáfora en la publicidad británica y en la española desde la teoría de la relevancia.” Pragmalingüística 7: 45-54.
• Díaz Pérez, Francisco Javier. (2000): “Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance Theory and its applicability to advertising discourse: Evidence from British Press Advertisements.” ATLANTIS XXII: 37-50.
• Díez Velasco, Olga Isabel. (2001): “Metaphor, metonymy, and image-schemas: an analysis of conceptual interaction patterns.” Journal of English Studies 3: 47-63.
• Dirven, René, and Pörings, Ralf, eds. (2003): Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. [Cognitive Linguistic Research 20]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• van Enschot-van Dijk, Renske. (2006): “Retoriek in reclame. Warndering voor Schema’s en tropen in tekst en beeld” [Rhetoric in advertising. Appreciation of schemes and tropes in text and image]. Ph. D. Dissertation. Nijmegen: Radbound Universiteit.
• Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. (2006): Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Feldman, Jerome. (2006): From Molecule to Metaphor. A Neural Theory of Language. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Forceville, Charles. (1994): “Pictorial metaphor in billboards: Relevance theory perspectives.” In J. Müller, ed., Towards a Pragmatics of the Audiovisual, Münster: Nodus, 93-113.
• Forceville, Charles. (1996): Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.
• Forceville, Charles. (2006): “Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research.” In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, eds., Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 379-402.
• Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A., Marisol Velasco-Sacristán, Ascensión Arribas-Baño, and Eva Samaniego-Fernández. (2001): “Persuasion and advertising English: metadiscourse in slogans and headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(8): 1291-1307.
• Geeraerts, Dirk. (2003): “The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions.” In R. Dirven and R. Pörings, eds., 435-465.
• Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Herbert J. Colston. (2006): “The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations.” In D. Geeraerts, ed., Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 239-268.
• Gibbs, Raymond W., and Markus Tendahl. (2006): “Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance Theory and psycholinguistics.” Mind & Language 21 (3): 379-403.
• Goossens, Louis. (1995): “Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action.” In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. M. Simon-Vanderbergen, and J. Vanparys, eds., By Word of Mouth. Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 159-174.
• Goatly, Andrew. (1994): “Register and the redemption of relevance theory: the case of metaphor.” Pragmatics 4: 139-191.
• Hampe, Beate, ed. (2005): From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Herrero Ruiz, Javier. (2002): “Sequencing and integration in metaphor-metonymy interaction.” RESLA 15: 73-91.
• Hurtienne, Jörn, and Johann Habauk Israel. (2007): “Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns of tangible interaction.” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction: 127-134.
• Jhally, Sut. (1987): The Codes of Advertising. London: Routledge.
• Johnson, Mark. (1987): The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Johnson, Mark. (1993): Moral Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Khale, Lynn. (1986): “Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 6(3): 5-12.
• Kneebone, John. (2002): “Design et marketing, un mariage de raison?” Revue Française du Marketing 187, February: 93.
• Kimmel, Michael. (2005): “Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas.” In B. Hampe and J. E. Grady, eds., From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 285-311.
• Krzeszowski, Tomasz. (1990): “The axiological aspect of idealized cognitive models.” In J. Tomaszczyk and B. Lewandowska, eds., Meaning and Lexicography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 135-165.
• Krzeszowski, Tomasz. (1993): “The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata.” In R. A. Geiger and B. Rudzka-Ostyn, eds., Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 307-330.
• Krzeszowski, Tomasz. (1997): Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.
• Krzeszowski, Tomasz. (2004): “Metaphors of discourse: Between co-operative and oppositional discourses.” In A. Duszak and U. Okulska, eds., Speaking from the Margin. Global English from a European Perspective, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 107-116.
• Lagerwerf, Luuk. (2007): “Irony and sarcasm in advertisements: Effects of relevant inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(10): 1702-1721.
• Lakoff, George. (1987): Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
• Lee, Michael. “Persuasion in Advertising – How to Use Persuasion Techniques in Advertising.” Ezine Articles, 2008. Available at http://ezinearticles.com/?Persuasion-in-Advertising---How-to-Use-PersuasionTechniques-in-Advertising&id=1336753.
• Lim, Elison Ai Ching, Suree Hoon Ang, Yin Hwai Lee, and Siew Leong. “Processing Idioms in Advertising Discourse: Effects of Familiarity, Literality, and Compositionality on Consumer Ad Response.” Journal of Pragmatics (in press), 2008. doi: 10.106/j.pragma.2008.09.034.
• Lukas, Scott A. “The Gender Ads Project.” 2002. Available at http://www.genderads.com.
• Ma, Lin. “Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising and Consumer Interpretation of Its Cultural Meaning.” China Media Research 4.3 (2008): 9-17.
• Martin, James, and David Rose. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London and New York: Continuum, 2003.
• McQuarrie, Edward F., Phillips, and Barbara Phillips. “Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words.” Journal of Advertising 34 (2005): 7-20.
• Melchenko, Liana. “Inferences in Advertising: A Study of Swedish and Russian TV Commercials.” MA Thesis: Lund University, 2003.
• Meyers-Levy, Joan, and Prashant Malaviya. “Consumers’ Processing of Persuasive Advertisements: An Integrative Framework of Persuasion Theories.” Journal of Marketing 63 (1999): 45-60.
• Mills, Sara. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• van Mulken, Margot, Renske van Enschot-van Dijk, and Hans Hoeken. “Puns, Relevance, and Appreciation in Advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 37.5 (2005): 707-721.
• Núñez Perucha, Begoña. Esquemas de Imágenes y Modelos Populares: Un Estudio del Lenguaje de la Victimización en Textos Narrativos en Lengua Inglesa. Logroño: AESLA (CDRom), 2003.
• Panther, Klaus-Uwe. “Metonymy as a Usage Event.” In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, eds., Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Amsterdam and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006: 147-186.
• Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg, eds. Metonymic and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2003.
• Papafragou, Anna. “On Metonymy.” Lingua 99 (1996): 169-195.
• Pateman, Trevor. “How is Understanding an Advertisement Possible?” In H. Davis and P. Walton, eds. Language, Image, Media. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983, 187-204.
• Pauwels, Paul, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. “Value Judgment in the Metaphorization of Linguistic Action.” In R. A. Geiger and B. Rudzka-Ostyn, eds., Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993: 331-367.
• Pauwels, Paul, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. “Body Parts in Linguistic Action: Underlying Schemata and Value Judgments.” In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon-Vandenbergen, and J. Vanparys, eds., By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995: 35-70.
• Peña, Sandra. A Cognitive Approach to Image-Schematic Component in the Metaphorical Expression of Emotion in English. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja, 2000.
• Pollay, Richard W. “The Identification and Distribution of Values Manifest in Print Advertising, 1900-1980.” In R. E. Pitts and A. G. Woodside, eds., Personal Values and Consumer Psychology. Lexington, MS: Lexington Press, 1984: 11-129.
• Pop, Aniºoara. The Grammar of Advertising. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Risoprint, 2008.
• Radden, Günter, and Zoltan Kövecses. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, eds., Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1999.
• Riemer, Nick. “Remetonymizing Metaphor: Hypercategories in a Semantic Extension.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2001): 379-401.
• Rocamora Abellán, Rafael. “Metonymy-Based Metaphors in Advertising.” Linguagem, Cultura e Cogniçao: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva 2 (2004): 245-261.
• Roiz Célix, Miguel. Técnicas Modernas de Persuasión. Madrid: Biblioteca Eudema, 1996.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Interaction.” ATLANTIS 19.1 (1997): 201-295.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Metonymy.” In A. Barcelona, ed., Cognitive Linguistics in the Study of the English Language and Literature in English. Monograph issue of Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6.2 (1997): 161-178.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “Understanding Through Metonymy: The Role of Metonymy in Communication and Cognition.” In B. Peñas, ed., The Pragmatics of Understanding and Misunderstanding. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, Servicio de Publicaciones, 1998: 197-208.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonimia.” Granada: Método, 1999.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “From Semantic Underdetermination via Metaphor and Metonymy to Conceptual Interaction.” Laud 492 (1999): 1-21.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. “The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy.” In A. Barcelona, ed., Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Topics in English Literature 30. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000: 109-132.
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, and Olga Isabel Díez Velasco. “Patterns of Conceptual Interaction.” In R. Dirven and R. Pörings, eds., 489-532, 2003.
• Del Sáez Rubio, Mª Milagros, and Barry Pennock Speck. “An Approach to the Notion of Covert/Overt Communication in Television Commercials.” Paper presented at the XXVII International Conference of AESLA- Asociación Española de Lingüística, Ciudad Real, 26-28 March 2009.
• Schmidt, Rosmarie, and Joseph F. Kess. Television Advertising and Televangelism: Discourse Analysis of Persuasive Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1986.
• Sinha, Christopher. “The Cost of Renovating the Property: A Reply to Marina Rakova.” Cognitive Linguistics 13 (2002): 271-276.
• Smith, Neil, and Deirdre Wilson. “Introduction.” Lingua 87 (1992): 1-10.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford UK and Cambridge USA: Blackwell, 1986.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading.” Mind and Language 17 (2002): 3-23.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. “A Deflationary Theory of Metaphor.” In R. Gibbs, ed., Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 84-105.
• Talmy, Leonard. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1988): 49-100.
• Tanaka, Keiko. “The Pun in Advertising: A Pragmatic Approach.” Lingua 87 (1992): 91-102.
• Tanaka, Keiko. Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1994.
• Taylor, John R. Linguistic Crosscategorisation: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks, 1995.
• Umiker-Sebeok, Jean. “Power and the Construction of Gendered Spaces.” International Review of Sociology 6.3 (1996): 389-403.
• Ungerer, Friedrich. “Muted Metaphors and the Activation of Metonymies in Advertising.” In A. Barcelona, ed., Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000: 321-340.
• Velasco Sacristán, Marisol. “Overtness-Covertness in Advertising Gender Metaphors.” Journal of English Studies (in press, a).
• Velasco Sacristán, Marisol. “Interacción Entre Metáfora y Metonimia en el Discurso Publicitario.” RESLA (paper presented at the XXVII International Conference of AESLA- Asociación Española de Lingüística, Ciudad Real, 26-28 March 2009) (in press, b).
• Velasco Sacristán, Marisol, and Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera. “Metáfora y LSP: Valor Cognitivo de la Metáfora en el Discurso Publicitario de British Cosmopolitan.” In I. Sanz Sainz and A. Felices Lago, eds., Las Nuevas Tendencias de las Lenguas de Especialidad en un Contexto Internacional y Multicultural. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2004: 863-878.
• Velasco Sacristán, Marisol, and Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera. “Towards a Critical Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Gender Metaphors in Advertising English.” Journal of Pragmatics 38.11 (2006): 1982-2002.
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. “Relevance Theory.” In L. R. Horn and G. Ward, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Section 3. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004: 607-632.
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston. “Metaphor, Relevance, and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue.” Mind & Language 21 (2006): 406-433.
• Yus Ramos, Francisco. “A Decade of Relevance Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998): 305-345.
• Yus Ramos, Francisco. Relevance Theory Bibliographic Service (Thematic Sections). Created in 2000 and last modified on 28 November 2008. URL: http://www.ua/personal/francisco.yus/rt.htm.
• Zargaj-Reynolds, Paula. “The Advertising is Good for You Blog” (especially its section on ‘Sexist Advertising’). Available at http://pzrservices.typepad.com/advertisingisgoodforyou/sexist_advertising (2008-2009).
• Zlatev, Jordan. “What’s in a Schema? Bodily Mimesis and the Grounding of Language.” In B. Hampe and J. E. Grady, eds., From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005: 313-342.