Rentabilidad del capital en el centro y la periferia de la Eurozona. Un análisis comparativo

  1. Juan Pablo Mateo Tomé 1
  2. Fahd Boundi Chraki 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM
Revista:
Revista de economía mundial

ISSN: 1576-0162

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 58

Páginas: 115-140

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openArias Montano editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de economía mundial

Resumen

This research addresses a topic barely studied in the literature of the Eurozone, namely a comparative study of the profitability of capital in a representative sample of the most advanced economies and the periphery. Based on a political economy approach, calculations of the profit rate and the volume of surplus are shown, as well as the (labor) productivity of surplus, employment, and the process of capital accumulation. The study reveals an asymmetry between the center and the periphery in terms of profitability, and a related underlying problem. Moreover, it identifies a profound change since the Great Recession, though so far this does not materialize in any trends towards a productive convergence between core and peripheral economies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Álvarez, N.; Luengo, F. y Uxó, J. (2013): Fracturas y crisis en Europa, Clave Intelectual, Madrid.
  • Cafruny, A. y Ryner, M. (2016): The European Union and global capitalism: origins, development, crisis, Palgrave, Londres.
  • Cámara, S. (2008): “Bienestar, actividad económica y cuentas nacionales: Reflexiones en torno al concepto de trabajo productivo”, Política y Sociedad, 45(2), 151?167.
  • Celi, G., Ginzburg, A., Guarascio, D. y Simonazzi, A. (2016): Crisis in the European Monetary Union: A core?periphery perspective, Routledge, Londres.
  • Clévenot, M., Guy, Y. y Mazier, J. (2010): “Investment and the rate of profit in a financial context: the French case”, International Review of Applied Economics, 24(6), 693–714.
  • Del Río, Alfredo (2018): Análisis centro?periferia en la UE?20 (1995?2014). Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • FBBVA (2019): El Stock y los servicios del capital en España y su distribución territorial y sectorial (1964-2016). Fundación BBVA, Madrid.
  • FMI (2020): World economic outlook database, abril, Fondo Monetario Internacional, Washington DC.
  • Frohlich, N. (2013): “Labour values, prices of production and the missing equalisation tendency of profit rates: evidence from the German economy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(5), 1107?1126.
  • Gambarotto, F. y Solari, S. (2015): “The peripheralization of Southern European capitalism within the EMU”, Review of International Political Economy, 22(4), 788?812.
  • Kliman, A. (2011): The failure of capitalist production, Londres: Pluto Press.
  • Li, M., Xiao, F. y Zhu, A. (2007): “Long waves, institutional changes, and historical trends: a study of the long?term movement of the profit rate in the capitalist world?economy”, Journal of World?Systems Research, 13(1), 33?54.
  • Maito, E.E. (2018): “The tendency of the rate of profit to fall since the nineteenth century and a world rate of profit”, en G. Carchedi y M. Roberts (eds) World in crisis, Haymarket, Chicago (pp. 129-156).
  • Maniatis, T., y Passas, C. (2018): “Surplus value, profit, and unproductive labor in the Greek Economy, 1958?2013”, en G. Carchedi y M. Roberts (eds) World in crisis, Haymarket, Chicago (pp. 228?252).
  • Nölke, A. (2016): “Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of Comparative Capitalism”, Socio?Economic Review, 14(1), 141–161.
  • OCDE (2020): Statistical indicators, Organización para la Cooperación Económica y el Desarrollo, Paris.
  • Parker, O. y Tsarouhas, D. (eds.) (2018): Crisis in the Eurozone periphery: the political economies of Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal, Palgrave, Londres.
  • Pascariu, G.C. y Tiganasu, R. (2017): “Integration, growth and core?periphery pattern in EU’s economy: theoretical framework and empirical evidences, en G.C. Pascariu y M.A. Pedrosa (eds) Core?periphery patterns across the European Union. Case studies and lessons from eastern and southern Europe, Emerald Publishing, Londres (pp. 23?88).
  • Prebisch, R. (1949): El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40010?desarrollo?economico?la?america?latina?algunos?sus?principales?problemas
  • Roberts, M. (2016): The long depression, Haymarket, Chicago.
  • Savran, S. y Tonak, A. (1999): “Productive and unproductive labour: an attempt at clarification and classification”, Capital & Class, 23(2), 113?152.
  • Shaikh, A. y Tonak, A. (1994): Measuring the wealth of nations: the political economy of national accounts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Stockhammer, E., Constantine, C. y Reissl, S. (2020): “Explaining the Euro crisis: current account imbalances, credit booms and economic policy in different economic paradigms”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 43(2), 231?266.
  • Trofimov, I. (2017): “Profit rates in developed capitalist economies: a time series investigation”, PSL Quarterly Review, 70(280), 85-128.
  • Weiß, T. (2015): “The rate of return on capital in Germany ?an empirical study”, 19th FMM Conference The Spectre of Stagnation? Europe in the World Economy, Berlin Steglitz, 22?24 octubre.
  • Weissenbacher, R. (2018): “Peripheral integration and disintegration in Europe: the ‘European dependency school’ revisited”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 81?98.
  • Weissenbacher, R. (2020): The core?periphery divide in the European Union. A dependency perspective, Palgrave, Londres.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet