As Percepções dos Alunos de Engenharia sobre as Práticas de Avaliação da Aprendizagem

  1. Moreira, Herivelto
  2. Gravonski, Isabel
  3. Fraile Aranda, Antonio
Revista:
Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa

ISSN: 1989-0397

Any de publicació: 2012

Volum: 5

Número: 3

Pàgines: 275-290

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa

Resum

The objective of this study was to identify the perceptions of students from four engineering courses at a public university in Curitiba - Paraná on the evaluation learning practices used by teachers. The theoretical framework for the study was drawn from various national and international authors on the complexity and importance of evaluation for the qualification of future professionals in the field of engineering. The methodological approach was qualitative. The sample consisted of six male students and one female student from the 8th, 9th and 10th periods of four Engineering courses (Electronics, Electrical, Mechanical and Civil Construction). The data was collected through semi-structured individual interviews. The main results show that there is a predominance of summative evaluation in most of the disciplines of the four engineering courses (and in teachers’ practices), and students' participation through self-assessment, peer review is rare and undervalued. Students participating in this study have a clear perception about their participation in the teaching and learning process; how they develop the academic work and evaluation practices that are important to them.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Álvarez Méndez, J. M. (2003). La evaluación a examen: ensayos críticos. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
  • Bogdan, R. e Biklen, S. (1994). A investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora.
  • Bonsón, M. e Benito, A. (2005). A. Evaluación y Aprendizaje. In: A. Benito e B. Cruz, Nuevas claves para la docência universitaria en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior, pp.87-100. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society, Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2), pp. 151–167. Acessado em 20 agosto de 2011. em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/713695728 doi: 10.1080/713695728.
  • Boud, D., e Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), pp. 399–413. doi: 10.1080/02602930600679050.
  • Boud, D. e Falchikov, N. (Ed.). (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for the long term. Oxon, Routledge.
  • Brown, S. and Glasner, A. (2000). Assessment matters in higher education: choosing and using diverse approaches. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Carless, D., Joughin, G., e Mok, M. M. C. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Principles and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, pp. 395–398. doi: 10.1080/02602930600679043.
  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44 (1), pp. 57-66, February. Acessado em 15 marzo de 2011. em: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/education/pdf/david-carless-3.pdf. doi: 10.1080/14703290601081332.
  • Carless, D. (2009b). Learning-oriented assessment: Principles, practice and a project. In: L. H. Meyer, S. Davidson, H. Anderson, R. Fletcher, P. M. JOHNSTON, and M.REES. (Eds.). Tertiary assessment and higher education student outcomes: Policy, practice and research, pp.79–90. Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa and Victoria University of Wellington.
  • CNE, MEC, BRASIL (a). Parecer CNE/CES 1.362/2001: Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais dos Cursos de Engenharia. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 25 de fevereiro de 2002.
  • Fraile Aranda, (2008). A. Nuevos retos en la formación del profesorado ante la convergencia europea universitaria. Revista Enlace Universitario, 9, pp. 384-389. Universidad de Bolivar. Ecuador.
  • Fraile Aranda, A. (2009). El espacio europeo de enseñanza superior: un controvertido camino para la formación y el cambio educativo del profesorado universitario. Revista Universidades, Universidade de México, 40, pp. 3-17.
  • Garcia. J. (2009). Avaliação e aprendizagem na educação superior. Est. Aval. Educ., São Paulo, 20 (43), pp. 201-213, maio/ago. Acessado 8 mar. 2012 em: http://www.fcc.org.br/pesquisa/publicacoes/eae/arquivos/1489/1489.pdf.
  • Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Godoy, A. S. (2000). Avaliação da aprendizagem no ensino superior: um estudo exploratório a partir das opiniões dos alunos do primeiro e do último ano de três cursos de graduação. Administração On Line: Prática, Pesquisa, Ensino, (Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado FECAP), v.1, n.1, Jan./Fev./Mar. Acessado 24 de marzo de 2012 em: http://www.fecap.br/adm_online/art11/arilda.htm.
  • Hager, P. Gonczi, A. and Athanasou, J. (1994). General issues about assessment of competence. Assessment in Higher Education, 19 (1), pp. 3-16. doi: 10.1080/0260293940190101.
  • Hoffmann, J. M. L. (2005). Pontos e contrapontos: do pensar ao agir da avaliação. Porto Alegre: Mediação.
  • Luckesi, C. (1984). Avaliação educacional escolar; para além do autoritarismo. Tecnologia Educacional, Rio de Janeiro, ABT, 13 (61), nov./dez, pp. 6-15.
  • Marton, F., Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In: F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. Entwistle. (Ed.). The Experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education, pp. 39–59. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • Mcdonald, R. Boud, D., Francis, J. and Gonczi, A. (1995). New Perspectives on Assessment. Paris: Unesco. Acessado 01 julio de 2012 em: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001018/101855e.pdf.
  • Moreira, H. Caleffe, L. G. (2008). Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lamparina.
  • Perrenoud, P. (1999). Avaliação: da excelência à regulação das aprendizagens – entre duas lógicas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
  • Rabelo, E. H. (2001). Avaliação: novos tempos novas Práticas. 5. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes.
  • Romanowisk, J. P. e Wachowicz, L. A. (2004). A avaliação formativa no ensino superior: que resistências manifestam os professores e os alunos? In: G.C.L. Anastasiou, e L. P. Alves. Processos de ensinagem na universidade: pressupostos para as estratégias de trabalho em aula. Joinville, pp.124-139. SC: UNIVILLE.
  • Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Education Research. 78 (1), pp. 154-189. Acessaso 25 marzo 2012 em: http://rer.sagepub.com/content/78/1/153.full.pdf+html. doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795.
  • Struyven K., Dochy, F. and Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, (4), August 2005, pp. 331–347. Acessado 23 abril 2011 em: https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0015308/Publications/Proof%20CAEH300401.pdf. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000318091
  • Tang, S. Y. F., and Chow, A. W. K. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), pp. 1066–1085, Acessado 12 de junio de 2011 em: http://repository.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/4659. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.013
  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, pp. 477–501. Acessado el 13 de Julio de 2011 em: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3447452?uid=1116704&uid=3737664&uid=2129&uid=5 909624&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=20563&uid=67&uid=62&sid=56283393013. doi: 10.1023/a:1023967026413.
  • Zabalza, M. A. La enseñanza universitaria. Madrid: Nancea, 2002a.
  • Zabalza, M. A. (2002b). Diseño curricular en la universidad. Competencias del docente universitario. Madrid: Narcea. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001018/101855e.pdf�
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet