La formación del profesorado para la enseñanza integrada de contenidos y lengua extranjeraperspectivas de un debate europeo actual

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adán, A. Alvir, A., Blanco, M. et al. (2013). Proyecto AgroInglés, Proyecto de Innovación Educativa de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.Madrid: UPM.
• Aguilar Pérez, M. & Rodriguez, R. (2012) Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 15 (2), 183-197.
• Almenta, E. (2011) CLIL Teacher Training across Europe. Current state of the art, good practices and guidelines for the future. Available from: http://uma.academia.edu/EstefaniaAlmenta, accessed 11 May 2013.
• Ball, P. & Lindsay, D. (2012) Language demands and support for English Medium Instruction in tertiary education. In English-Medium Instruction at Universities. A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J.M. Sierra (eds.) (pp. 44-64). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Bentley, K. (2010). The Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT).CLIL Module. Cambridge: CUP.
• Bologna Declaration (1999). The European Higher Education Area. Joint Declaration of the European Ministers of Education Convened in Bologna at the 19th of June 1999.
• CLIL Cascade Network (2010). Talking the Future: Languages in Education 2010-2020. CCN Foresight Think Tank Report: University of Jyvaskyla
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Coleman, J. (2006). English-Medium Teaching in European Higher Education, Language Teaching 39, 1- 14.
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Dafouz, E. (2008). La Universidad y el reto bilingüe. ¿Está preparada la educación superior para el aprendizaje en una lengua extranjera? AULA de Innovación Educativa, 168, 45- 49.
• Dafouz, E., Nuñez, B., Sancho, C., & Foran, D. (2007). Integrating CLIL at the Tertiary Level: Teachers’ and Students’ Reactions. In D. Wolff & D. Marsh (eds.) Diverse Contexts, Converging Goals: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe (pp.91- 102).Frankfurt, Peter Lang.
• Dafouz, E. & Guerrini, M. (eds.) (2009). CLIL across education levels: opportunities for all. Madrid: Richmond-Santillana Publishing.
• Dafouz, E. & Núñez, B. (2009). CLIL in higher education: devising a new learning landscape. In E. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (eds.) (pp.101-112).
• Dafouz, E., Camacho, M., & Urquía, E. (2013). ‘Surely they can't do as well’: a comparison of business students’ academic performance in English-medium and Spanish-as-firstlanguage-medium programmes, Language and Education 28 (3), 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2013.808661
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and language integrated learning: from practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.
• Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J.M. (2012). (Eds.) English-Medium Instruction at Universities: Global Challenges (Bristol, Multilingual Matters)
• Eurydice Network. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
• Eurydice Network. (2012). Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe 2012. Brussels: Eurydice.
• Fortanet, I. (2012). Academics’ beliefs about language use and proficiency in Spanish multilingual higher education. Aila Review 25, 48 – 63
• Francomacaro, M.R. (2011). English as a Medium of Instruction at an Italian Engineering Faculty: an Investigation of Structural Features and Pragmatic Functions. University of Naples, Doctoral Thesis.
• Gierlinger, E. (2013). The languages for CLIL Model, Available from http://clilingmesoftly.wordpress.com/clil-teachers-tl-competence/, accessed 11 April 2014.
• Graddol, D. (2010). English next India: The future of English in India. London: The BritishCouncil. Available from: http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-english-nextindia-2010-book.pdf, accessed 11 April 2014.
• Halbach, A. (2009). The primary school teacher and the challenges of bilingual education. In E. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (eds.) (pp.19-26).
• Johnson, M. (2012). Bilingual Degree Teacher's Beliefs: A case study in a tertiary setting. Pulso Revista de Educación 35, 49-74.
• Klaassen, R. (2008). Preparing lecturers for English-medium instruction. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (eds.) Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp.32- 42). Maastricht, Maastricht University Language Centre.
• Lasagabaster, D. & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.) (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Library.
• Llinares, A., Morton, T. & Whittaker, R. (2011). The Role of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: CUP.
• Llinares A. & R. Whittaker (2011). Functions of language in CLIL secondary classes: a systemic functional approach. In C. Escobar, & L. Nussbaum (eds.) Learning through another Language (pp.141-161). Barcelona: UAB.
• Marsh D., Maljers A. & Hartiala A.K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL Classrooms. Languages Open Doors (Jyväskylä, University of Jyväskylä)
• Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE –The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Jyväskylä: UniCOM, University of Jyväskylä
• Marsh, D. & J. Laitinen (2005). Medium of instruction in European higher education: Summary of research outcomes of European Network for Language Learning Amongst Undergraduates (ENLU) Task Group 4. Jyväskylä: UniCOM, University of Jyväskylä.
• Martín del Pozo, M.A. (2013). Formación lingüística del profesorado universitario para la docencia en inglés. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 11 (3). 197-218.
• Martín del Pozo, M.A. (April 2015). The needs of a new EAP learner: CLIL teachers. In. P. Shrestha, (Ed.) Current Developments in English for Academic and Specific Purposes: Local innovations and global perspectives. (pp. 115-138). Reading: Garnett Education.
• Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2013). Degree Programs in English Language in the Spanish University System. MECD
• Moate, J. (2010). The Integrated Nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective. International CLIL Research Journal 1 (3) 38-45.
• Pavón, V. & Rubio, F. (2010). Teachers’ concerns and uncertainties about the introduction of CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum, 14, 45-58.
• Pena, C. & Porto, M. (2008). Teacher beliefs in a CLIL education project. Porta Linguarum, 10, 151-161.
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present, future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15(3), 315-341
• Sánchez García, D. (2010). Classroom interaction in University Settings: The case of questions in three disciplines. M.A Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
• Torrego Egido, L. (2004) Ser profesor universitario, ¿un reto en el contexto de la convergencia europea? UN recorrido por declaraciones y comunicados. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación de Profesorado, 51, 259-268.
• Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L. & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and How CLIL Works. An Outline for a CLIL Theory. Vienna English Working Papers 16, 3, 70-78.
• Wolff, D. (2007). Bridging the gap between school and working life. In D. Wolff & D. Marsh (eds.) (pp.120-130)