Evaluación de impactos ambientales bióticos en la industria química mediante uso de software libre

  1. Fernando Gutiérrez-Martín
  2. Antonio Nieto-Márquez
  3. Evangelina Atanes
  4. Mercedes Ruiz-Pastrana
Journal:
Formación Universitaria

ISSN: 0718-5006

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 7

Issue: 1

Pages: 3-12

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-50062014000100002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Formación Universitaria

Abstract

The methodological aspects required for evaluating the risks associated to the synthesis of chemical products is presented. The study is part of the efforts done at the universities Polytechnic of Madrid and of Valladolid in Spain. Chemical risk assessment, such as estimating the inputs of contaminants, their environmental fates and impact indexes, are presented. These concepts are illustrated by means of a case study where the biotic impacts from alternative reaction pathways to produce 1-naftil-metilcarbamato are analyzed using the EPI Suite and Mackay Level III software, together with proper databases. Its relevance in higher education is mainly related to the use of systematic criteria based in chemistry and environmental valuations. It is concluded that the use of the method and program described are valuable tools to interpret biotic impact both during the professional formation and during the professional life.

Bibliographic References

  • Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances, Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (TLV &BEIs). American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Cincinnati OH. 2011.
  • Alha, K, Hollinger, C, Larsen, B.S, Purcell, P, Rauch, W. (2000). Environmental engineering education: summary report of the 1stEuropean Seminar. Water Science and Technology. 2. 1-7
  • Allen, D.T, Rosselot, K.S. (1997). Pollution Prevention for Chemical Processes. Wiley Pub. New York.
  • Allen, D.T, Shonnard, D.R. (2002). Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes. Prentice Hall PTR Publishers. Upper Saddle River^eNJ NJ.
  • (2011). Level III Model,v 2.70 (en línea): Centre for Environmental Modeling & Chemistry. Trent University. PeterboroughOntario.
  • Chulvi, B. (2010). Entrevista a Joel Tickner: Las empresas necesitan apoyo de la ciencia para sustituir los tóxicos. Por Experiencia. 48.
  • (2002). Green Chemistry Expert System: en línea. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
  • (2008). Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST): en línea. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
  • (2012). Estimation Programs InterfaceSuite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11: en línea. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
  • (2013). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): en línea. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC.
  • García-Serna, J, Pérez-Barrigón, L, Cocero, M.J. (2007). New trends for design toward sustainability in chemical engineering: Green engineering. Chemical Engineering Journal. 133. 7-30
  • Gutiérrez-Martín, F, Dahab, M.F. (1998). Issuesof sustainability and pollution prevention in environmental engineering education. Water Science and Technology. 38. 271-278
  • Gutiérrez-Martín, F, Hüttenhain, S.H. (2003). Environmental education: new paradigms and engineering syllabus. J.Cleaner Production. 11. 247-251
  • Gutiérrez, F, Sanchiz, M.A, Hernández, M.T, Atanes, E. (21 a). Chemicalengineering: new paradigms and environmental syllabus. Granada. Actas del 4th European Congress of Chemical Engineering.1.1-012
  • Gutiérrez, F, Quirce, A. (2004). Engineering Education in Sustainable Development (EESD 2004). CIMNEUPC. Barcelona. 132
  • Gutiérrez, F, Domínguez, M.T. (2006). Información y control de riesgos químicos en el nuevo reglamento REACH. Ingeniería Química. 435. 168-170
  • Gutiérrez-Martín, F, Díaz Fernández-Zapata, P, Sanchiz-Rocha, M.A, Hernández-Antolín, M.T. (2007). Nuevos paradigmas y métodos para la educación ambiental en la ingeniería: producción limpia, ecología industrial y desarrollo sostenible. Cuadernos de Innovación Educativa en las Enseñanzas Técnicas. 1. 11-20
  • Gutiérrez-Martín, F, Hernández-Antolín, M.T, Sanchiz-Rocha, M.A, Díaz Fernandez-Zapata, P. (18 a). Aplicación de Software Libre a la Evaluación de Contaminantes en el Medio Ambiente. Valladolid. Actas del 15º Congreso de Innovación Educativa en Enseñanzas Técnicas.705-714
  • Howard, P, Meylan, W. (2001). Assessing environmental fate and exposure. Chemical Engineering. 3. 91-96
  • (2006). ECO informas: en línea. Instituto Sindical de Trabajo, Ambiente y Salud, CCOOFondo Social Europeo.
  • Lancaster, M. (2002). Handbook of Green Chemistry & Technology. Blackwell Pub. Oxford. 10-26
  • Lemkowitz, S.M, Bibo, B.H, Lameris, G.H, Bonet, B.A. (1996). From small scale, short term to large scale, long term: integrating sustainability into engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 4. 353-386
  • Mackay, D, Paterson, S. (1991). Evaluating the multimedia fate of organic chemicals: a level III fugacity model. Environmental Science & Technology. 25. 427-436
  • Mackay, D. (2001). Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach. 2ª. Lewis PublishersCRC Press. Boca Raton^eFL FL. 1-261
  • Mulder, K.F. (2006). Sustainable Development for Engineers. Delft University of TechnologyGreenleaf Pub. Sheffield. 251-277
  • Nieto-Márquez, A, Cambra, A, Gutiérrez-Martín, F. (26 a). Evaluación de impactos ambientales bióticos en la industria química mediante uso desoftware libre. Granada. Actas del I Congreso de Innovación Docente en Ingeniería Química.31
  • Nieto-Márquez, A, Atanes-Sánchez, E, Gutiérrez-Martín, F. Free software for evaluation of biotic environmental impacts in chemical processindustries (CPIs). T15-003. Sevilla. ANQUE International Congress of Chemical Engineering.
  • (2006). National Institute of Health Sciences: en línea. Setagaya-kuTokyo 158-8501.
  • (2013). National Toxicology Program: en línea. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. ^eNC NC.
  • (2006). Producción limpia, ecología industrial y desarrollo sostenible: en línea. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
  • (2013). Occupational, Safety & Health Administration: en línea. US Departmentof Labor. Washington, DC.
  • Rosenbaum, R.K, Margni, M, Jolliet, O. (2007). A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. Environment International. 33. 624-634
  • Serrano, J.E, Narváez, P.S. (2010). Uso de software libre para el desarrollo decontenidos educativos. Formación Universitaria. 3. 41-50