Categorías, intuiciones y espacio-tiempo kantiano

  1. Sús, Adán 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Valladolid
Revue:
Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso

ISSN: 0719-4242 0719-4234

Année de publication: 2016

Titre de la publication: (2do semestre)

Número: 8

Pages: 223-249

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22370/RHV/20168/54 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso

Résumé

Kant states that space and time are a priori conditions of experience, while apparently being committed to the euclidean nature of space and absolute simultaneity. His defense of the a priori character of spatio-temporal notions stems from taking them as pure intuitions, so its newtonian nature would derive from the configuration of what Kant names as intuition. Nevertheless, according to some recent discussions, it is not clear what intuition means for Kant and how space-time is determined from it. In this paper I look into the debate about the origin of the synthesis of pure intuition that, according to Kant, would determine the spatio-temporal structure. I discuss to what extent taking into account the participation of categories in such a synthesis might have an effect on the commitment that, according to the kantian perspective, one should have with respect to the metric being determined a priori. My conclusion is that kantian analysis can incorporate the idea of a spatio-temporal metric that is not given, in the sense of universally and necessarily, a priori. 

Références bibliographiques

  • Friedman, M. (2001). Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Friedman, M. (2003). “Trascendental philosophy and mathematical physics”, en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 29-43.
  • Friedman, M. (2012). “Kant on geometry and spatial intuition”, en Synthese 186, 231-255.
  • Kant, I. (1978). Crítica de la razón pura. (Traducción española de Pedro Ribas). Madrid: Alfaguara.
  • Manders, K. (2008). “Diagram-based geometrical practice”, en P. Mancosu (ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 65–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Martinez Marzoa, F. (1989). Releer a Kant. Barcelona: Editorial Anthropos.
  • Shabel, L. (2003a). Mathematics in Kant’s critical philosophy: Reflections on mathematical practice. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Shabel, L. (2003b). “Reflections on Kant’s concept (and intuition) of space”, en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 45-57.
  • Torretti, R. (1974). “La geometría en el pensamiento de Kant”, en Anales del Seminario de Metafísica (Madrid) 9: 9-60.
  • Torretti, R. (1996). Relativity and Geometry. New York: Dover Publications.
  • Torretti, R. (1996). “Las analogías de la experiencia de Kant y la filosofía de la física”, en Anales de la Universidad de Chile, Sexta Serie, 4: 77-96.
  • Torretti, R. (1999). The Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Torretti, R. (2004). “Intuición pura”, en César Ojeda & Alejandro Ramírez (eds.), El sentimiento de lo humano en la ciencia, la filosofía y las artes: Homenaje al Profesor Félix Schwartzmann Turkenich. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria, 111–134.