Tecnología ecológica para la planificación de cuencas hidrográficasregímenes caudales ambientales

  1. Diez Hernandez, Juan Manuel 1
  2. Burbano Burbano, Liliana 2
  1. 1 Universidad del Cauca
    info

    Universidad del Cauca

    Popayán, Colombia

    ROR https://ror.org/04fybn584

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial: BSAA

ISSN: 1909-9959,  1692-3561

Año de publicación: 2007

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Páginas: 20-31

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial: BSAA

Resumen

La regulación de las corrientes fluviales es un proceso creciente desde que la sociedad comenzó a explotar los bienes y servicios que proporcionan estos sistemas. Una Gestión Hídrica ambiental persigue el aprovechamiento equilibrado de las funciones del medio fluvial, mediante un Régimen de Caudales Ambientales (RCA) adecuado que salvaguarde el patrimonio hidrobiológico y sociocultural, así como el disfrute de valores intrínsecos cada vez más apreciados (ecología, cultura, recreación o estética). Este trabajo revisa los efectos de la alteración del régimen natural de caudales en el ecosistema fluvial y analiza el modo de implantar unos caudales ecológicos confiables en Colombia. Se exponen ordenadamente los métodos principales para calcular RCA en el ámbito internacional y las pautas especificadas en la legislación nacional para esta finalidad. Finalmente, se concretan varios conceptos claves y las pautas convenientes para incorporar los caudales ambientales en los Planes de Ordenamiento de Cuencas y en las Evaluaciones Ambientales Estratégicas locales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARBER, W.E., OSWOOD, M.W. y DESCHERMEIER, S.J. A fish stream habitat survey technique for predicting fish abundance. En: Proc. Symposium Acquisition of Aquatic Habitat Information. N.B. ARMANTROUT (Ed). Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda. Maryland, 1980.
  • BESCHTA, R.L. y JACKSON, W.L. The intrusion of fine sediments into a stable gravel bed. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36, 207- 210, 1979.
  • BINNS, N.A. Habitat quality index procedures manual. Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Cheyenne, Wyoming, 1982.
  • BINNS, N.A. y EISERMAN, F.M. Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming. Trans. American Fisheries Society, 108, 215-228, 1979.
  • BOVEE, K.D. Development and Evaluation of Habitat Suitability Criteria for Use in IFIM. Instream Flow Paper No. 21, Fort Collins (CO-EEUU), 1986.
  • BOVEE, K.D. y MILHOUS, R.T. Hydraulic Simulation in Instream Flow Studies: Theory and Techniques. Instream Flow Paper No.5, US Fish & Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-78/33, 1978.
  • BRAGG, O.M., BLACK, A.R., y DUCK, R.W. Antrhopogenic impacts on the hydrology of rivers and lochs. Literature review and proposed methods. Scotland & Forum for Environmental Research, 1999.
  • CAISSIE, D. y EL-JABI, N. Comparison and regionalization of hydrologically based instream flow techniques in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineer, 22, 235-246, 1994.
  • CAMPO ERAZO, Y.F. y RUIZ COBO, D.H. Estimación del Régimen de Caudales Ecológicos en el río Palacé (Cauca). Tesis de Grado Biología, Universidad del Cauca. Popayán, Colombia, 2001.
  • CHAPMAN, R.J., HINCLEY, T.M., LEE, L.C., y TESKEY, R.O. Impact of water level changes on woody riparian wetland communities. USFWSOBS-82/83. Kearnesysville, EEUU, 1982.
  • COLLINGS, M.R. A Methodology For Determining Instream Flow Requirement for Fish, Proceedings of Instream Flow Methodology Workshop, 72-86. Washington Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, EEUU, 1972.
  • DACOVA, SN., UZUNOV, Y., y MANDADJIEV, D. Low Flow - the river´s ecosystem limiting factor. Ecological Engineering, 2000.
  • DIEZ HERNÁNDEZ, J.M. Análisis Comparativo de los métodos de simulación hidráulica en PHABSIM, con propuesta de nuevos métodos hidráulicos en una dimensión. ProQuestInformation and Learning, Madrid, España, 2005. ISBN 0-496-97826-8, 428 p.
  • DIEZ HERNÁNDEZ, J.M. Modelación fluvial multidimensional aplicada al cálculo de Caudales Ecológicos. Actas XVII Seminario Nacional de Hidráulica e Hidrología (CD). 15-16/09/2006, Popayán, 2006.
  • FAUSCH, K.D. y BESTGEN, K.R. Ecology of fishes indigenous to the central and southwestern Great Plains. 131-166, en: Ecology and Conservation of Great Plains vertebrates. Knopf, F.L. y Samson, F.B. (Eds). Springer-Verlag. New York, 1997.
  • FISHER, S.G. Succession in streams, 7-27, en: Stream Ecology: application and testing of general ecology theory. Barnes, J.R. y Minshall, G.W. (Eds). Plenumm Press, New York, 1983.
  • GHANEM, A., STEFFLER, P., y HICKS, F. Two Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Flow in Aquatic Habitats. Water Resources Engineering Report. Department of Civil Engineering. University of Alberta. Edmonton, Canadá, 1995.
  • GORDON, N.D., McMAHON, T.A. y FINLANYSON, B.L. Stream hydrology: An introduction for Ecologist. Chicester, Reino Unido. Wiley & Sons. Reino Unido, 1992.
  • HOPPE, R.A. Minimum streamflows for fish. Proc. of the Soils Hydrology Worshop. U.S. Forest Service, Montana State University. Bozeman, Montana., 1975.
  • HUPP, C.R. y OSTERKAMP, W.R. Bottomland vegetation distribution along Passage Creek, Virginia, in relation to fluvial landforms. Ecology, 66, 670-681, 1985.
  • JUNK, W.J., BAYLEY, P.B. y SPARKS, R.E. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106, 110-127, 1989.
  • KING, J.M., THARME, R.E., Y BROWN, C.A. World Commission on Dams Thematic Report: Definition and implementation of instream flows. University of Cape Town, South Africa, 1999
  • LAYZER, J.B. Integrating hydraulic stream ecology with the instream flow incremental methodology for determining conservation flows for freshwater mussels. 170-183, en: Proc. 1st International Sympsium on Habitat Hydraulics. Throndheim, Noruega, 1994.
  • MONTGOMERY, W.L. y MCCORMICK, S.D. Spring migratory synchrony of salmonid, catostomid, and cyprinid fishes in Rivière á la Truite, Québec. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 2495-2502, 1983.
  • MOORE, K.M. y GREGORY, S.V. Response of young-of-the-year cutthroat trout to manipulations of habitat structure in a small stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 117, 162-170, 1988.
  • NELSON, F. Evaluation of Four Instream Flow Methods Applied to Four Trout Rivers in Southwest Montana, Montana Dept. Fish Wildlife and Parks Report (14-16-006-78-046), 1980.
  • NICKELSON, R.E. y REISENBICHLER, R.R. Streamflow requirements of salmonids. Progress report of the Oregon Dept. Fish Wildl. AFS-62 No. 14-16-0001-4247. Portland, Oregon, 1977.
  • NICKELSON, T.E. Development of methodologies for evaluating instream flow needs for salmonid rearing. 334-343, en: Proceedings of the Symposium and Specialty Conference on Instream Flow Needs. ORSBORN, J.B. Y ALLMAN, C.H. (Eds). American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, Maryland, 1976.
  • NÆSJE, T., JONSSON, B., y SKURDAL, J. Spring flood: a primary cue for hatching of river spawning Coregoninae. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 2190-2196, 1995.
  • ORTH, D.J. y MAUGHAN, O.E. Evaluation of the Incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes. Trans. of the American Fisheries Society, 111, 413-445, 1982.
  • OSWOOD, M.E. y BARBER, W.E. Assessment of fish habitat in streams: goals, constraints, and a new techinque. Fisheries, 7(3), 8-11, 1982.
  • PAYNE, T.R. y DIEZ HERNÁNDEZ, J.M. Actualización del Modelo RHABSIM 3.0 para estimación de caudales ecológicos. Revista EIDENAR, Vol. 111, 1(3), 12-17, 2005.
  • POFF, N.L. Natural flow regime as a paradigm for river restoration, a hydroecological context for ecohydraulics?. Proc. V International Symposium on Ecohydraulics. Madrid, 2004.
  • RICHTER, B.D., BAUMGARTNER, J.V., y POWELL, J. A Method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 10, 1163-1174, 1996.
  • RITCHER, B.D., BAUMGARTNER, J.V. y WIGINGTON, R. How much water does a river reed?. Freshwater Biology, 37, 231-249, 1997.
  • ROOD S.B. y MAHONEY, J.M. Instream flows and the decline of the riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 1250-1260, 1995.
  • SANZ RONDA, F.J. Evaluación de diferentes técnicas de muestreo utilizadas en la cuantificación del hábitat fluvial. Tesis Doctoral, ETS Ingenierías Agrarias, Uni-versidad de Valladolid, España, 2004.
  • SCOTT, M.L., FRIEDMAN, J.M., y AUBLE, G.T. Fluvial proccesses and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology, 14, 327-339, 1996.
  • STALNAKER, C.B. y ARNETTE, J.L (Eds). Methodologies for the Determination of Stream Resource Maintenance Flow Requirements. Utah State University. Logan, Utah, 1976.
  • STANDFORD, J.A. y WARD, J.V. Stream regulation in North America. 215-236, en: The ecology of regulated streams. Ward, J.V. y Standford, J.A. (Eds). Plenum Press. New York, 1979.
  • STATZNER, B. y CAPRA, H. Focusing Environmental Management Budgets on Non-linear System Responses. Freshwater Biology, 37, 463- 472, 1997.
  • STRENG D.R., GLITZENSTEIN, J.S., y HARCOMBE, P.A. Woody seedling dynamics in an East Texas floodplain forest. Ecological Monographs 59, 177-204, 1989.
  • TAYLOR, D.W. Eastern Sierra riparian vegetation: ecological effects of stream diversion. Mono Basin Research Group Contribution No. 6, Report to Inyo National Forest, 1982..
  • TENNANT, D.L. Instream flow requirements for fish, wildlife, recreation, and related environmental resources. 359-373, en: Proc. Symposium and Specialty Conference on Instream Flow Needs. Osborn, J.B. y Allman, C.H (Eds). Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, Maryland, 1976.
  • THARME, R.E. Review of the International Methodologies for the Quantification of the Instream Flow Requirements of Rivers. Water Law Review Final Report for Policy Development for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 1996.
  • TRÉPANIER, S., RODRÍGUEZ, M.A. y MAGNAN, P. Spawning migrations in landlocked Atlantic Salmon: time series modelling of river discharge. Journal of Fish Biology, 48, 925-936, 1996.
  • WADDLE, T. (ed.). PHABSIM for Win-dows: User´s Manual and Exercises. U.S. Geological Survey. Fort Collins, Colorado, 2001.
  • WALKER, K.F., SHELDON, F., y PUCKRIDGE, J.T. A perspective on dryland ecosystem. Regulated Rivers, 11, 85-104, 1995.
  • WATERS, B.F. A methodology for evaluating the effects of different streamflows on salmonid habitat. 334-343 (Vol. II), en: Proc. Symposium and Specialty Conference on Instream Flow Needs. OSBORN, J.B. y ALLMAN, C.H. (Eds). Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, Maryland, 1976.
  • WHARTON, C.H. y LAMBOU, V.W. The fauna of bottomland hardwoods in the southeastern United States, 87-160, en: Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests. Clark, J.R. y Benforado, J. (Eds.). Elsevier Scientific. New York, 1981.
  • WHITE, R.J., HANSEN, E.A. y ALEXANDER, G.R. Relationship of trout abundance to stream flow in Midwestern streams. 334-343 (Vol. II), en: Proc. Symposium and Specialty Conference on Instream Flow Needs. OSBORN, J.F. y ALLMAN, C.H. (Eds). Am. Fish. Soc. Bethesda, Maryland, 1976.
  • WILLIAMS, D.D. y HYNES, H.B.N. The ecology of temporary streams II: General remarks on temporary streams. Internationale Revue des gesampten Hydrobiologie 62, 53-61, 1977.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet