Think globally, act locallymapping the free-culture movement in a hybrid media system

  1. Dafne Calvo
  2. Eva Campos Domínguez
Journal:
IC Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación

ISSN: 1696-2508

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 16

Pages: 357-389

Type: Article

More publications in: IC Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación

Metrics

Cited by

  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 2 (25-02-2024)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2019
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.116
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Linguistics and Language Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 618/1150
  • Area: Cultural Studies Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 652/1228
  • Area: Library and Information Sciences Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 202/267
  • Area: Communication Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 349/498

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Impact: 0.200
  • Field: COMUNICACIÓN Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 34/66

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2019
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.2
  • Area: Cultural Studies Percentile: 35
  • Area: Linguistics and Language Percentile: 31
  • Area: Communication Percentile: 17
  • Area: Library and Information Sciences Percentile: 12

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.04
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: COMMUNICATION Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 194/206

Abstract

From the nineties, the Internet has been providing new political hybrid action forms. At the same time, some communities make a disruptive use of technologies aiming to subvert network power relationships at the current capitalized and centralized cyberspace. Addressing a collaborative mapping, we identified 290 free culture communities in Spain. Their characteristics suggest the relevance of offline spaces and local areas to deliberate, propose and perform political participation towards a neutral, centralised and free Internet.

Bibliographic References

  • Ander Egg, E. (2003). Repensando la investigacion accion participativa : comentarios y sugerencias. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
  • Antoniadis, P. (2016). Local networks for local interactions: Four reasons why and a way forward. First Monday, 21(12). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7123/5661
  • Arcila Garrido, M., & López Sánchez, J. A. (2011). La cartografía cultural como instrumento para la planificación y gestión cultural. Periférica, (12), p. 15–36.
  • Barranquero, A., & Montero, D. (2015). La elaboración de una cartografía sobre los medios del tercer sector en España. Descripción de un proceso de investigación colaborativa. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, 10, p. 17–25.
  • Benkler, Y. (2003). Freedom in the Commons. Duke Law Journal, 52(1245).
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  • Bingham-Hall, J., & Law, S. (2015). Connected or informed? Local Twitter networking in a London neighborhood. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 205395171559745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715597457
  • Birkinbine, B., Gómez, R., & Wasko, J. (Eds.). (2016). Global media giants. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). Razones prácticas. Sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Carr, N. (2008). El gran interruptor. El mundo en red, de Edison a Google. Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto.
  • Carrasco-Arroyo, S. (2013). Cultural mapping. Hacia un sistema de información cultural territorial (SICT). Revista Dos Puntas, (8), p. 4–12.
  • Carty, V. (2013). New Information Communication Technologies and Grassroots Mobilization. Information, Communication & Society, 13(2), 155–173. DOI: 10.1080/13691180902915658
  • Castells, M. (2008). Comunicación, poder y contrapoder en la sociedad red (II). Los nuevos espacios de la comunicación. Telos, (75).
  • Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizationalhybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471666
  • Chadwick, A. (2012). Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 45–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23
  • Chadwick, A. (2013) They Hybrid Media System. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703993104
  • Christl, W., & Spiekermann, S. (2016). Networks of Control. A Report on Corporate Surveillance, Digital Tracking, Big Data & Privacy. Vienna: Facultas.
  • Coleman, G. (2015). Epilogue: The State of Anonymous. In Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy. The many faces of anonymous (pp. 401–434). New York: Verso.
  • Contreras, R. (2002). La Investigación Acción Participativa (IAP): revisandosus metodologías y sus potencialidades. In Durston, J. & Miranda, F. (Eds.), Experiencias y metodología de la investigación participativa (pp. 9–18).Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
  • Dahlberg, L., & Siapera, E. (2007). Introduction: Tracing Radical Democracy and the Internet. In L. Dahlberg & E. Siapera (Eds.), Radical Democracy and the Internet. Interrogating Theory and Practice (pp. 1–16). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • De Filippi, P., & Hassan, S. (2016). Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. First Monday, 21(12). DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113
  • Duxbury, N. (2015). Positioning Cultural Mapping in Local Planning and Development Contexts: An Introduction. Culture and Local Governance, 5(1), 1–7.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2010). Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebook-enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389
  • Freitas, R. (2015). Cultural mapping as a development tool. City, Culture and Society, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.10.002
  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Retos para la democracia: Medios sociales y esfera pública. Revista Telos, 1–11.
  • Fuchs, C., & Trottier, D. (2015). Towards a theoretical model of social media surveillance in contemporary society. Communications-European Journal of Communication Research, 40(1), 113–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0029
  • Fuster Morell, M. (2012). The Free Culture and 15M Movements in Spain: Composition, Social Networks and Synergies. Social Movement Studies,11(3–4), 386–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.710323
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets. Social media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Gibson, R. K., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(03), 701–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431
  • Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2013). Online social ties and political engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 21–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.712461
  • Giovanella, F. (2016). Alternative rules for alternative networks? Tort law meets wireless community networks. First Monday, 21(12).
  • Haro Barba, C., & Sampedro Blanco, V. (2001). Activismo político en Red: del Movimiento por la Vivienda Digna al 15M. Revista Teknokultura, 8(2), 157–175. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5372430
  • Himanen, P. (2002) La ética del hacker y el espíritu de la Era de la información. Barcelona: Imagino destino.
  • Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? (Vol. 53). Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203490037
  • Juris, J. S. (2012a). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
  • Juris, J. S. (2012b). The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within AntiCorporate Globalization Movements. American Ethnologist, 597(1), 189–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270338
  • Juris, J. S., Pereira, I., & Feixa, C. (2012). La globalización alternativa y los ‘novísimos’ movimientos sociales. Revista Del Centro de Investigación de La Universidad La Salle, 10(37), 23–37.
  • Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: the cultural significance of free software. Stanford: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01725_19.x
  • Leistert, O. (2012). Resistance against cyber-surveillance within social movements and how surveillance adapts. Surveillance and Society, 9(4), 441–456.
  • Lessig, L. (2004). Por una cultura libre. Cómo los grandes grupos de comunicación utilizan la tecnología y la ley para clausurar la cultura y controlar la creatividad. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Lima Santos, L. (1983). La naturaleza de la Investigación-Acción. Lima: Celats.
  • Lyon, D. (2015). The snowden stakes: Challenges for understanding surveillance today. Surveillance and Society, 13(2), 139–152.
  • Martínez Illa, S., & Mendoza Hernández, R. (2011). Cartografías Culturales : Mapeo y Acción Cultural. Periférica: Revista para el análisis de la cultura y el territorio, 12, 37–53.
  • Mattelart, A., & Vitalis, A. (2015). De Orwell al cibercontrol. Barcelona: Editorial GEDISA.
  • Maxigas, P. (2012). Hacklabs and hackerspaces – tracing two genealogies. Journal of Peer Production, (2). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/hacklabs-and-hackerspaces/
  • McChesney, R. W. (2015). Desconexión Digital. Cómo el capitalismo está poniendo a internet en contra de la democracia. Barcelona: El viejo topo.
  • McNutt, K. (2014). Public engagement in the Web 2.0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context. Canadian Public Administration, 57(1), 49–70.
  • Mercea, D. (2013). Probing the Implications of Facebook Use for the Organizational Form of Social Movement Organizations. Information, Communication & Society, 16(8), 1306–1327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.770050
  • Moreno-Caballud, L. (2013). Desbordamientos culturales en torno al 15-M. Teknokultura, 10(1), 101–130. Retrieved from http://teknokultura.net/index.php/tk/article/view/79/pdf
  • Mosco, V. (2014). La nube. Big data en un mundo turbulento. Barcelona: Biblioteca buridán. Retrieved from http://uci.or.kr/G300-jX1088034.v12n2p245
  • Ortí Mata, M. & Díaz Velázquez, E. (2012) «Claves teóricas y metodológicas para la investigación acción participativa (IAP)», In M. Arroyo Menéndez & I. Sádaba Rodríguez. Metodología de la investigación social. Técnicas innovadoras y sus aplicaciones (pp. 153-174). Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: the Evaluation of Institutions and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Padilla, M. (2012). El kit de la lucha en internet : para viejos militantes y nuevas activistas. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2003). El declive del capital social: un estudio internacional sobre sociedades y el sentido comunitario. Political Science and Politics. Retrieved from http://www.pyrenaeus.org/talaia2/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/El-declive-del-capital-socialPutman-Robert.pdf
  • Sampedro Blanco, V. (2005) «La red del 13-M. A modo de prefacio». In V. Sampedro Blanco. 13-M: Multitudes online (pp. 11-23). Madrid: Catarata.
  • Sassen, S. (2003). Los espectros de la globalización. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina.
  • Sierra Caballero, F. (2013) «Comunicología y tecnopolítica emergente. Nuevas mediaciones y espacios de liberación social.», Revista de Estudios para el Desarrollo Social de la Comunicación, 8(11), pp. 11-19.
  • Slatter, D., & Howard, Z. (2013). A place to make , hack , and learn : makerspaces in Australian public libraries. The Australian Library Journal. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2013.853335
  • Sletto, B., Bryan, J., Torrado, M., Hale, C., & Barry, D. (2013). Territorialidad, mapeo participativo y política sobre los recursos naturales: la experiencia de América Latina. Cuadernos de Geografía - Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 22(julio-diciembre), 193–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.1.1074
  • Stallman, R. (2004). Software libre para una sociedad libre. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
  • Stewart, S. (2010). Cultural mapping toolkit. Vancouver: Creative City Network of Canada.
  • Stoecker, R. (2002). Cyberspace vs Face to Face Community Organizing in the New Millenium. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 1(2), 143–164.
  • Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2014). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
  • Toret, J. et al. (2013) Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. El sistema red 15M, un nuevo paradigma de la política distribuida. Barcelona: UOC.
  • Treré, E. (2019) Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 197–208.
  • Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). The Internet and new modes of politicalparticipation: online versus offline participation. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 937–955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356