The language of secessionist activismDiscourse and dialogue on Twitter

  1. Zamora-Martínez, Patricia 1
  2. Durántez-Stolle, Patricia 1
  3. Martínez-Sanz, Raquel 1
  4. Hernández-Herrarte, María 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 European University Miguel de Cervantes
Revista:
Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies

ISSN: 1757-1898

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Páginas: 59-78

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1386/CJCS_00014_1 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies

Proyectos relacionados

POLITAINMENT EN EL ENTORNO DE LA POSVERDAD: NUEVAS NARRATIVAS, CLICKBAIT Y GAMIFICACIÓN

2018/00118/001

Resumen

Nowadays, Twitter is used by politicians to communicate directly with citizens, due to the Internet’s ability not only to inform, but to establish a dialogue and mobilize publics. The present research explores the use of Twitter as a medium of communication and debate in the rise of the Catalan independence movement. To attain this objective, the official profile of the Generalitat’s ex-president Carles Puigdemont is studied during the month before the referendum date. Through a quantitative and qualitative analysis of his tweets, it is observed if he seeks to mobilize the audience, as well as influence their opinion on the right to decide, and their voting intention. In addition, we aim to approach the response he obtains from the social audience. Based on citizens’ reactions to his tweets, the research analyses these users’ impressions; whether they support the separatist theses, and if the consequent debate entails a tone of rupture or tension.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ampofo, L., Anstead, N. and O’Loughlin, B. (2011), ‘Trust, confidence, and credibility. Citizen responses on Twitter to opinion polls during the 2010 UK general election’, Information, Communication & Society, 14:6, pp. 850–71.
  • Anderson, P. (2019), ‘“Independence 2.0”: Digital activism, social media and the Catalan independence movement’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11:2, pp. 191–207.
  • Baeza, E. (2012), Cómo crear una campaña electoral de éxito: guía para la gestión integral de campañas electorales, Madrid: EIUNSA.
  • Balcells, J. and Padró-Solanet, A. (2019), ‘Crossing lines in the Twitter debate on Catalonia’s independence’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25:1, pp. 28–52.
  • Ballesteros, C. (2015), ‘El desafío inadvertido: La consulta sobre la indepen- dencia de Cataluña desde el marco informativo del conflicto’, Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 53, pp. 48–64.
  • Berrocal, S., Campos-Domínguez, E. and Redondo, M. (2014), ‘Media prosu- mers in political communication: Politainment on YouTube’, Comunicar, 22:43, pp. 65–72.
  • Carrasco, R., Villar, E. and Tejedor, L. (2018), ‘Twitter como herramienta de comunicación política en el contexto del referéndum independentista catalán: asociaciones ciudadanas frente a instituciones públicas’, Icono14, 16:1, pp. 64–85.
  • Castells, M. (2009), Comunicación y Poder, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Chadwick, A. (2007), ‘Digital network repertories and organizational hybridity’, Political Communication, 24:3, pp. 283–301.
  • Cotarelo, R. (2013), ‘De la política de partidos a la política de multitudes’, in R. Cotarelo (ed.), Ciberpolítica: las nuevas formas de acción y comunicación políticas, Valencia: Tirant Humanidades, pp. 217–55.
  • Durántez-Stolle, P. and Martínez-Sanz, R. (2019), ‘Politainment in the trans- media construction of the image of politicians’, Communication & Society, 32:2, pp. 111–26.
  • Esteve, M. and Borge, R. (2018), ‘Echo chambers in parliamentary Twitter networks: The Catalan case’, International Journal of Communication, 12, pp. 1715–35.
  • Fenoll, V. and Cano-Orón, L. (2017), ‘Citizen engagement on Spanish poli- tical parties’ Facebook pages: Analysis of the 2015 electoral campaign comments’, Communication & Society, 30:4, pp. 131–48.
  • Flesher, C. and Gillan, K. (2018), Technology, Media and Social Movements, London: Routledge.
  • Gamir, J. (2016), ‘Blogs, Facebook and Twitter in Spanish general election 2011: Cuantitative study of the use of the web 2.0 by candidates of the PP and PSOE’, Dígitos, February, https://revistadigitos.com/index.php/digitos/arti- cle/view/53/23. Accessed 2 September 2019.
  • García-Beaudoux, V. and D’Adamo, O. (2006), ‘Comunicación política y campañas electorales: análisis de una herramienta comunicacional: el spot televisivo’, Polis: Investigación y análisis sociopolítico y psicosocial, 2:2, pp. 81–111.
  • Gomes, W., Fernandes, B., Reis, L. and Silva, T. (2009), ‘The election campaign on line of Barack Obama in 2008’, Cuadernos de H Ideas, 3:3, pp. 15–36, https://perio.unlp.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/cps/article/view/1391/1698. Accessed 2 September 2019.
  • Hahn, K. S., Ryu, S. and Park, S. (2015), ‘Fragmentation in the Twitter following of news outlets’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 92:1, pp. 56–76.
  • Hänska, M. and Bauchowitz, S. (2017), ‘Tweeting for Brexit: How social media influenced the referéndum’, in J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy and R. Tait (eds), Brexit, Trump and the Media, Bury St Edmunds: Abramis Academic Publishing, pp. 31–35.
  • Hernández-Santaolalla, V. and Mármol, I. (2017), ‘Online shaming y redes sociales: Twitter como espacio de ajusticiamiento social’, in A. Chaves- Montero (ed.), Comunicación política y redes sociales, Sevilla: Egregius, pp. 57–74.
  • Hernández-Santaolalla, V. and Sola-Morales, S. (2019), ‘Post-truth and intimi- dation on Twitter during Catalan referendum 1-O’, Observatorio (OBS*), 13:1, pp. 102–21.
  • Jensen, M. J. (2016), ‘Social media and political campaigning: Changing terms of engagement?’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22:1, pp. 23–42.
  • Jungherr, A. (2016), ‘Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13:1, pp. 72–91.
  • Khatua, A. and Khatua, A. (2016), ‘Leave or remain? Deciphering Brexit deli- berations on Twitter’, IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW '16), Barcelona, 12–15 September.
  • Lachlan, K. and Levy, D. (2016), ‘BIRGing, CORFing, and Twitter activity following a political referendum: Examining social media activity concer- ning the 2014 Scottish independence vote’, Communication Research Reports, 33:3, pp. 217–22.
  • Lejarza, A., Oteo, M., Zaballa, J. and León, J. M. (2015), ‘Análisis de marcos interpretativos del proceso de independencia de Cataluña’, Inguruak, Revista vasca de Sociología y Ciencia Política, May, http://www.inguruak. eus/index.php/inguruak/article/view/9/6. Accessed December 2015.
  • Llewellyn, C. and Cram, L. (2016), ‘Brexit? Analyzing opinion on the UK-UE referendum within Twitter’, Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Cologne, 17–20 May.
  • López-López, P. C., Romero-Ortega, A. B. and Ramos-Gil, Y. T. (2018), ‘La construcción del relato político a través de la narrativa transmedia: el caso del presidente Puigdemont en el proceso independentista catalán’, Razón y Palabra, June, https://www.revistarazonypalabra.org/index.php/ryp/arti- cle/view/1194. Accessed 17 June 2018.
  • López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S. and Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017), ‘What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016’, El profesional de la información, 26:5, pp. 795–804.
  • Mancera, A. and Helfrich, U. (2014), ‘La crisis en 140 caracteres: el discurso propagandístico en la red social Twitter’, Cultura, lenguaje y representación, 12, pp. 59–86.
  • Mancera, A. and Pano, A. (2013), El discurso político en Twitter: Análisis de mensajes que trinan, Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Moragas, C. M. (2016), ‘Claiming independence in 140 characters: Uses of metaphor in the construction of Scottish and Catalan political discourses on Twitter’, Ph.D. thesis, Tarragona: Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
  • Munir, S. (2018), ‘Social media and shaping voting behavior of youth: The Scottish referendum 2014 case’, The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7:1, pp. 253–79.
  • Pedersen, S., Baxter, G., Burnett, S., Goker, A., Corney, D. and Martin, C. (2014), ‘Backchannel chat: Peaks and troughs in a Twitter response to three televised debates during the Scottish Independence Referendum campaign 2014’, Conference for Edemocracy and Open Government 2015 (CeDEM15), Krems, 21–23 May.
  • Puig, E. (2016), ‘Unmasking trolls: Political discussion on Twitter during the Parliamentary election in Catalonia’, Trípodos, 39, pp. 53–69, http://www. tripodos.com/index.php/Facultat_Comunicacio_Blanquerna/article/ view/380/556. Accessed 21 January 2018.
  • Quevedo, R., Portalés-Oliva, M. and Berrocal, S. (2016), ‘The image use on Twitter during the 2015 municipal election campaign in Spain’, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71:1, pp. 85–107.
  • Selva, D. and Caro, L. (2017), ‘The use of Instagram as a political communica- tion channel by Spanish deputies: The humanization strategy in the “old” and the “new” politics’, El profesional de la información, 26:5, pp. 903–15.
  • Sloam, J. (2018), ‘#Votebecause: Youth mobilisation for the referendum on British membership of the European Union’, New Media & Society, 20:11, pp. 4017–34.
  • Strömbäck, J. (2008), ‘Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediati- zation of politics’, The International Journal of Press
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet