Deliberative, Republican, and Egalitarian Institutional Alternatives for Popular Constitutionalism

  1. Bello Hutt, Donald 1
  1. 1 KU Leuven
    info

    KU Leuven

    Lovaina, Bélgica

    ROR https://ror.org/05f950310

Revista:
Revista Derecho del Estado

ISSN: 0122-9893,  2346-2051

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 48

Páginas: 183-214

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18601/01229893.N48.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Derecho del Estado

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este artículo examina y propone alternativas institucionales para el constitucionalismo popular. La propuesta es una combinación progresiva de instituciones que buscan dotar a la ciudadanía con el poder final para determinar qué significa una constitución, contribuyendo a asegurar su libertad republicana, implementando mecanismos de deliberación, al tiempo que es respetuoso de una forma particular de comprender la igualdad política. El artículo comienza con una descripción del constitucionalismo popular y de los principios que considero que deberían fundamentar la teoría. Luego, procede a examinar críticamente diversas propuestas institucionales presentes en la literatura. Después de mostrar las áreas en las que dichas propuestas se quedan cortas en el esfuerzo de encarnar los principios aquí defendidos, el artículo aboga por la implementación de cuatro mecanismos que, según sostendré, sí se acercan más a dichos objetivos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ackerman, Bruce y James S. Fishk in. Deliberation Day, yup, New Haven & London, 2004.
  • Alexy, Robert. Constitutional Rights, Balancing and Rationality. Ratio Juris, 16: 2, 2003a: 131-140.
  • Alexy, Robert. On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison. Ratio Juris 16: 4, 2003b: 433-449.
  • Alterio, Ana Micaela & Niembro, Roberto. Constitucionalismo popular en Latinoamérica, México DF: Porrúa, 2013.
  • Atria, Fernando. Revisión judicial: el síndrome de la víctima insatisfecha. Estudios Públicos, 2000: 347-402.
  • Bächtiger, André, Maija Setäla & Gröndlund. Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 225-245.
  • Barak, Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, cup, Cambridge, 2012.
  • Beatty, David M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. OUP, Oxford, 2005.
  • Beaumont, Elizabeth. The Civic Constitution: Civic Visions and Struggles in the Path Toward Constitutional Democracy, OUP, Oxford, 2014.
  • Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, cup, Cambridge, 2007.
  • Bello, Donald E. Against Judicial Supremacy in Constitutional Interpretation 31 (2017a): 7-28.
  • Bello, Donald E. Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 152 (64), 2017b: 77-103
  • Bello, Donald E. Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation, Theoria (Wiley) 84 (1), 2018: 83-111.
  • Bohman, James. Epistemic Value and Deliberative Democracy. The Good Society 18 (2) (2009): 28-34.
  • Bohman, James. Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, 1996.
  • Bohman, James. Representation in the deliberative system. In John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 72-94.
  • Bohman, James. Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4) (1998): 400-425.
  • Bonneau, Chris W. & Gann Hall, Melinda. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Routledge, New York, 2009.
  • Boswell, John, Carolyn M. Hendriks & Selen A. Ercan. Message received? Examining transmission in Deliberative Systems. Critical Policy Studies 10 (3), 2016: 263-283.
  • Button, Mark & David Michael Ryfe. What can we Learn from the Practice of Deliberative Democracy?. In John Gastil & Petter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: 2005: 20-33.
  • Calvert, Aubin & Mark E. Warren. Deliberative Democracy and Framing Effects: Why Frames are a Problem and How Deiberative MIni-Publics MIight Overcome Them. In Grönlund, Kimmo, André Bächtiger & Setälä, Maija (eds.). Deliberative Mini-Publics. Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014: 203-223.
  • Chambers, Simone. Deliberation and Mass Democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.), Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, cup, Cambridge, 2012: 53-71.
  • Chambers, Simone. Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6, 2003: 307-326.
  • Cohen, Joshua. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusets & London.1998, 67-92.
  • Couso, Javier A. The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Domestic Transition, 1990-2002. In Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella & Elin Skaar (eds.). Democratization and the Judiciary. The Accoountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Frank Cass, New York, 2005, 70-91.
  • Dahl, Robert. Democracy and its Critics. yup, New Haven & London, 1989.
  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook & R. Lawrence Jakobs . Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1), 2004: 315-344.
  • Donnelly, Tom. Making Popular Constitutionalism Work. Wisconsin Law Review 2012: 159-194.
  • Elster, Jon. Introduction. In Jon Elster, (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. CUP, Cambridge, 1998, 1-18.
  • Fishk in, James S. The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. YUP, New Haven, 1997.
  • Fishk in, James S. & Robert C. Luskin. The Quest for Deliberative Democracy. In Michael Saward (ed.). Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association Routledge, London, 2000, 17-28.
  • Fishk in, James & Cynthia Farrar. Deliberative Polling. From Experiment to Community Resource. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook.
  • Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey - Bass, San Francisco, 2005, 68-79.
  • Friedman, Barry. Mediated Popular Constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review 101 (8), 2003: 2596-2636.
  • Fung, Archon. Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3), 203: 338-367.
  • Gardbaum, Stephen. Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism. Icon 8, 2010: 167-206.
  • Gardbaum, Stephen. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Theory and Practice. cup, Cambridge, 2013.
  • Gargarella, Roberto. El nuevo constitutionalismo dialógico, frente al sistema de pesos y contrapesos. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 356-362.
  • Gargarella, Roberto. La justicia frente al gobierno. Sobre el carácter contramayoritario del poder judicial. Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.
  • Goodin, Robert E. & John S. Dryzek. Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society 34 2, 2006: 219-244.
  • Gosh, Eric. Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries. ojls 30 (2), 2010: 327-359.
  • Gutmann, Amy & Dennis Thompson. Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of HUP, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London ,1996.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. The mit Press, Massachussets & London, 1993.
  • Hanssen, Andrew F. The Political Economy of Judicial Selection: Theory and Evidence. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 9 (3), 1999: 413-424.
  • Hendriks, Carolyn M. Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells. Lay Citizen Deliberations. In John Gastil & Peter Levine (eds.). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2005: 80-110
  • Hiebert L., Janet. Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model?. The Modern Law Review 69 (1), 2006: 7-28.
  • Hogg , Peter W. & Allison A. Bushell. El Diálogo de la Carta Entre Tribunales y las Legislaturas. Revista Argentina de Teoría Juridica 14 (2), (2013).
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Hacket Publishing, Indianapolis & Cambridge, 1996.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Toward Perpetual Peace. In Pauline Kleingeld ed.). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. yup, New Haven & London 2006, 67-109.
  • Knowles, Helen J. & Julianne A. Toia. Defining ‘Popular Constitutionalism: The Kramer versus Kramer Problem. Southern University Law Review 42 (1), 2014: 31-59.
  • Kramer, Larry. “The Interest of the Man”: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” Valparaiso Law Review 41 (2), 2007: 697-754.
  • Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. OUP, Oxford, 2004a.
  • Larmore, Charles. A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 2001: 229-243.
  • Lorenzetti, Ricardo. Las Audiencias Públicas y la Corte Suprema. Revista Argentina de Teoría Política 14 (2), 2013.
  • Lovett, Frank. “Republicanism.” Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 10 11 2014, http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-in/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=republicanism.
  • Madison, James. Who Are the Best Keepers of the People’s Liberties?. In Ralph Ketcham (ed.), Selected Writings of James Madison. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2006, 227-229.
  • Manin, Bernard. On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory 15 (3), 1987: 338-368.
  • Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. cup, Cambridge, 1997.
  • Mansbridge, Jane et al. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In John Parkinson & Jane Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative systems: deliberative democracy at the large scale. Theories of Institutional Design, cup, Cambridge, 2012, 1-26.
  • Mansbridge, Jane et al. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1), 2010: 64-100.
  • Marcilla, Gema. Balancing as a Guide to Legislative Reasoning. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 93-104.
  • Marmor, Andrei. The Language of Law. oup, Oxford, 2014.
  • Martí, José Luis. La república deliberativa. Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2006.
  • McCormick, John. Machiavellian Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2011.
  • Miller, David. Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice. Political Studies 40 (1), 1992: 54-67.
  • Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. ¿Le importa a alguien que los legisladores razonen? Sobre el análisis y el control del debate parlamentario de las leyes. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa 57 (2), 2016: 5-37.
  • Oliver-Lalana, Daniel. Foreword: Towards a Theory of Legislative Argument. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 3-12.
  • Ovejero Lucas, Félix. La libertad inhóspita. Modelos humanos y democracia liberal. Paidós, Barcelona, 2002.
  • Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World. oup, Oxford, 2006.
  • Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A reply to five critiques. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (crispp) 18 (6), 2015: 687-696.
  • Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. cup, Cambridge, 2012.
  • Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997.
  • Pintore, Anna. Democrazia e diritti. Sette studi analitici. Edizioni ets, Pisa, 2010.
  • Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967.
  • Post, Robert & Reva Siegel. Democratic Constitutionalism. In Jack Balkin & Reva Siegel (eds.). The Constitution in 2020. oup, Oxford, 2009, 25-34.
  • Pozen, David. Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism. Columbia Law Review 110, 2010 2047-2134.
  • Rehg , William. Translator’s Introduction. In Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, The mit Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996, ix-xliii
  • Rodríguez Garavito, César. El Activismo Dialógico y el Impacto de los Fallos Sobre Derechos Sociales. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013: 211-244.
  • Ryan, Matthew & Graham Smith. “Defining Mini-publics”. In Kimmo Grönlund, André Bächtiger & Maija Setälä (eds.). Deliberative mini-publics. Involving citizens in the democratic process, ecpr Press, Colchester, 2014, 9-26
  • Sanders, Lynn. Poll Envy: An Assessment of Deliberative Polling. The Good Society 9, (1), 1999: 9-14.
  • Schäfer, Andreas. Deliberation in representative institutions: an analytical framework for a systemic approach. Australian Journal of Political Science, 2017: 1-17.
  • Schk ade, David, Cass R. Sunstein & Reid Hastie. When Deliberation Produces Extremism. Critical Review 2010: 227-252.
  • Schlink, Bernhard. Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why everywhere but here. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 22 (2012): 291-302.
  • Schmidt, Christopher. The Tea Party and the Constitution. 2011. The Tea Party and the Constitution. Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/546
  • Schwartzberg, Melissa. Should Progressive Constitutionalism Embrace Popular Constitutionalism?, Ohio State Law Journal 72 (6), 2011, 1295-1316.
  • Sebastián, Linares. Justicia dialógica interinstitucional: de lege ferenda y de lege lata. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica 14 (2), 2013.
  • Sieckmann, Jan. Legislative Argumentation and Democratic Legitimation. Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 69-91.
  • Skinner, Quentin. A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 2002: 237-268.
  • Skinner, Quentin. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. cup, Cambridge, 2008.
  • Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. cup, Cambridge, 1998.
  • Sunstein, Cass. The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2), 2002: 175-195.
  • Sydney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Edited by Thomas G. West, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1698.
  • Tschentscher, Axel, André Bächtiger, Jürg Steiner & Marco Steenbergen. Deliberation in Parliaments. Research Objectives and Prelminary Results of the Bern Center for Interdisciplinary Deliberation Studies (bids). Legisprudence 4 (1), 2010: 13-34.
  • Tushnet, Mark. Non-Judicial Review. Harvard Journal on Legislation 40 (2003): 453- 92.
  • Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. pup, Princeton, 1999.
  • Urbinati, Nadia. Representation as Advocacy. Political Theory 28 (6), 2000: 758-786.
  • Waldron, Jeremy. Political Political Theory. hup, Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2016.
  • Waldron, Jeremy. Representative Lawmaking. Boston University Law Review 89 (2009): 335-355.
  • Waldron, Jeremy. The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115 (2006): 1346-1406.
  • Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. cup, Cambridge, 1999.
  • Wintgens, Luc J. Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation. Ratio Juris 19 (1), 2006: 1-25.
  • Zietlow, Rebecca E. Popular Originalism? The Tea Party Movement and Constitutional Theory. Florida Law Review 64 (2), 2012: 483-512.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet