Podemos in the Regional Elections 2015Online Campaign Strategies in Castile and León

  1. Dafne Calvo 1
  2. Cristina Renedo Farpón 1
  3. María Díez-Garrido 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

ISSN: 1577-239X

Any de publicació: 2017

Volum: 16

Número: 2

Pàgines: 143-160

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.15304/RIPS.16.2.3897 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

Resum

Internet has revolutionized many aspects in the way that political parties communicate. The Network has induced a complete transformation of the political strategies used during election campaigns to spread their message to the electorate. Politicians use social networks and digital platforms to promote their messages and to communicate with citizens during these periods of time. Facebook has proven to be one of the most effective networks in this regard. The party Podemos was born in 2014 in Spain, surrounded by a deep economic, institutional and political crisis. This political party promises to be a real hope to the negative situation of the country. In the recent years, Podemos has aroused the interest of social scientists because of the innovative way they use social networks. This paper explores the cybercampaign strategies that Podemos used during the 2015 Castile and León regional elections, a region where the population is very different from the party’s average voter. To this end, a quantitative analysis of their activity on Facebook and their website was made during the regional election campaign. The results of this study allow us to observe an ordinary use of the digital tools by Podemos that highlights the engagement achieved with users in Facebook.

Informació de finançament

This article is the result of research conducted within the project “Online campaign strategies of the Spanish political parties: 2015-2016”, with reference CSO2013-44446-R, funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competi- tiveness, within the State Program R & D.

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • ABELLÁN GARCÍA, A. y PUJOL RODRÍGUEZ, R. (2015). El estado de la población mayor en España, 2015. Indicadores estadísticos básicos. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Retrieved from: http://envejecimiento.csic. es/documentos/documentos/enred-indicadoresbasicos15.pdf. Accessed: 18 October 2016.
  • CASTELLS, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Barcelona, Alianza.
  • DADER, J. L. (2009). “Ciberpolítica en los websites de partidos politicos”. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 17(34), pp. 4562.
  • DADER, J. L. (2015). “Fascinados por Podemos. Un fenómeno natural de la Democracia Sentimental”. H-ermes. Journal of Communication, 4, pp. 13-45.
  • DADER, J. L., CHENG, L., CAMPOS, E., QUINTANA, N., & VIZCAÍNO-LAORGA, R. (2014). “Las webs de los partidos españoles en campaña electoral. Continuismo entre 2008 y 2011”. Trípodos. Facultat de Comunicació i Relacions Internacionals Blanquerna, 34, pp. 115-152.
  • DELANY, C. (2012). How campaigns can use the internet to win in 2012. E‐Politics. Retrieved from: http://www.epolitics.com/winning-in-2012/. Accessed: 18 October 2016.
  • FENOLL, V., y CASTILLO, S. S. (2016). “Discurso y participación política en Plaza Podemos”. Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 3(5), pp. 24-33.
  • FERNANDES, J., GIURCANU, M., Bowers, K. W., & Neely, J. C. (2010). “The writing on the wall: A content analysis of college students’ Facebook groups for the 2008 presidential election”. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), pp. 653–675.
  • GALINDO, J. (2015) “Movilización social y representación política en España: de los indignados a Podemos.” In: Minnaert A. & Endara, G. (Coord.) Democracia participativa e izquierdas. Logros Contraducciones y Desafíos, pp. 437-467 Quito: Fiedrich Ebert Stiftung Ecuador.
  • GIBSON, R. K. (2015). “Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning”. Party politics, 21(2), pp. 183-197.
  • GIGLIETTO, F., y SELVA, D. (2014). “Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets”. Journal of Communication, 64(2), pp. 260–277. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12085. 21 September 2016.
  • HUGHES, D. J., ROWE, M., BATEY, M., & Lee, A. (2012). “A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage”. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), pp. 561-569.
  • INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA. (2016). Indicadores de Estructura de la Población. Edad Media de la Población por provincia, según sexo. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=3199. Accessed: 21 September 2016.
  • JARAIZ GULIAS, E. y BARREIRO RIVAS, X. (2015). “El perfil de los votantes y los componentes del voto en las Elecciones al Parlamento Europeo 2014”. Paper presented at: ‘XII Congreso de AECPA’, Universidad del País Vasco, 15 July 2015.
  • JENSEN, T. B., y DYRBY, S. (2013). “Exploring Affordances Of Facebook As A Social Media Platform In Political Campaigning”. Paper presented at: ‘21st European Conference of Information Systems’, Utrecht, Netherlands, 7 January 2013.
  • JEREZ, A., MACEIRAS, S., y MAESTU, E. (2015). “Esferas públicas, crisis política e internet: el surgimiento electoral de Podemos”. Hist. ciênc. saúde-Manguinhos, 22, pp. 1573-1596.
  • JUNTA DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN (2016). Resultados | Procesos Electorales a las Cortes de Castilla y León. Retrieved from: http://www.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/Elecciones/es/ Plantilla100/1265096415792/_/_/_. Accessed: 21 September 2016.
  • LEE, E., y OH, S. Y. (2012). “To personalize or depersonalize? When and how politicians’ personalized tweets affect the public’s reactions”. Journal of Communication, 62(6), pp. 932–949.
  • LÓPEZ GARCÍA, G. (2015) “Economic crisis, new media and new political structures. The case of “Podemos”: a Spanish ‘Yes, we can!’ against the two-party system in Spain”. Paper presented at: ‘IPSA Conference Communication, Democracy and Digital Technology’, Rovinj, Croatia, 2-3 October 2015.
  • LÓPEZ GARCÍA, G., CANO ORÓN, L., & ARGILÉS MARTÍNEZ, L. (2017). Circulación de los mensajes y establecimiento de la agenda en Twitter: el caso de las elecciones autonómicas de 2015 en la Comunidad Valenciana. Trípodos, (39), pp. 163-183.
  • MASSUCHIN, M. (2015). Campanha eleitoral e internet no Brasil: uma análise comparada do conteúdo informativo dos websites nas disputas majoritárias de 2012 e 2014. Thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos.
  • NIELSEN, R. K., y VACCARI, C. (2013). Do people “like” politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-scale direct candidate-to-voter online communication as an outlier phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7, 24.
  • PALOP, A. B., y GARCÍA, G. L. (2014). “El significado de las Elecciones Europeas de 2014 en España: giro a la izquierda y hundimiento del bipartidismo”. Unión Europea Aranzadi, 7, pp. 69-93.
  • RUEDA LAFFOND, J. (2015). “Hijos de la Transición. Podemos: relato, representación nacional y estrategias de divulgación política”. Paper presented at: ‘XVI Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Pécs’, Universidad de Pécs, 4-8 May 2015.
  • SAMPEDRO, V. (2015). “Podemos, de la invisibilidad a la sobre-exposición”. Teknokultura, 12(1), pp. 137-145.
  • SAMPIETRO, A., y ORDAZ, L. V. (2015). “Emotional politics on Facebook. An exploratory study of Podemos’ discourse during the European election campaign 2014”. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament y Anàlisi, 17, pp. 61-83.
  • SLIMOVICH, A. (2012). “Apuntes sobre las discursividades políticas en el Facebook de Mauricio Macri”. Tram [p] as de la comunicación y la cultura. 72, pp. 71-78.
  • WASKO, M. M. y FARAJ, S. (2005) “Why should I share? Examining knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice”. MIS Quarterly 29(1), pp. 35-57.
  • XUE, D. (2014). “Online media use during 2013 Japanese upper-house election: a content analysis of comments on candidates’ Facebook pages”. Keio Communication Review, 36, pp. 53–69.