A combination of transformative and authentic assessment through ICT in Physical Education

  1. Teresa Fuentes-Nieto
  2. Víctor Manuel López Pastor
  3. Andrés Palacios-Picos
Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726 1988-2041

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 44

Pages: 728-738

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V44I0.91459 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Abstract

This work analyses the results of an authentic assessment (AA) and transformative assessment (TA) experience and use of information and communication technology (ICT) in Physical Education (PE) classes in high school. The experience involves the use of the Plickers application, and the participation of the students in the evaluation (self-evaluation and peer evaluation processes). This study was carried out in a high school from Spain, as part of a didactic dance unit, with 38 students (15th years old). The AA and TA task was for small groups of students to create a video tutorial of salsa steps as a final product of a dance teaching unit; were self-assessed and peer-assessed using Plickers. Experience was also evaluated. Results: the use of AA and TA processes in PE in high school based on the use of ICT has been a very positive experience. For the students the video tutorial is a good method of learning and assessment and they value positively the peer-assessment and self-assessment processes they carried out, as well as the use of the Plickers. This study can be interesting to PE teachers interested in using AA, TA and ICT. Further research about this topic may be need.

Bibliographic References

  • AIESEP (2020). Position Statement on Physical Education Assessment. https://aiesep.org/scientific-meetings/position-statements/
  • Álvarez, I. (2005). Evaluación como situación de aprendizaje o evaluación auténtica. Revista perspectiva educacional 45, 45-68. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3333/333329100004.pdf
  • Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). Análisis de la motivación del alumnado hacia la expresión corporal a través del uso de la evaluación formativa y compartida (Analysis of student motivation towards body expression through the use of formative and share assessment). Retos, 40, 198-208. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.83025
  • Butler, S. A., & Hodge, S. R. (2001). Enhacing student trust through peer-assessment in Physical Education. The Physical Educator, 58(1), 30-39. https://search.proquest.com/openview/5a21b75fa6231e8ab741f6ccc61d47c1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=35035
  • Calatayud, M. A. (2019). Una oportunidad para avanzar hacia la evaluación auténtica en Educación Física (An opportunity to advance towards authentic assessment in Physical Education). Retos, 36, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v36i36.67540
  • Cassady, H., Clarke, G., & Latham, A. M. (2004). Experiencing evaluation: a case study of girls’ dance. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 9(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000208106
  • Chng, L., & Gurvitch, R. (2018). Using Plickers as an Assessment Tool in Health and Physical Education Settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(2), 19-25, DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2017.1404510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1404510
  • Collins, O. (2011). The use of ict in teaching and learning of physical education. Continental J. Education Research, 4(2), 29-32. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.367.9633&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Desrosiers, P., Genet-Volet, Y. & Godbout, P. (1997). Teachers’ Assessment Practices Viewed Through the Instruments Used in Physical Education Classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.16.2.211
  • Díaz Barahona, J., Molina-García, J., & Monfort-Pañego, M. (2020). El conocimiento y la intencionalidad didáctica en el uso de TIC del profesorado de educación física (Physical education teachers’ knowledge and educational intentionality in the use of ICT). Retos, 38, 497-504. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.74370
  • Erixon, P. (2010). School subject paradigms and teaching practice in lower secondary Swedish schools influenced by ICT and media. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1212-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.007
  • Fernández-Balboa, J. M. (2006). Dignity and democracy in the college classroom: The practice of self- evaluation. In R. A. Goldstein (ed.), Useful theory: Making critical education practical (pp. 105–28). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Marshall, J. P. (1994). Dialogical pedagogy in teacher education: Toward an education for democracy. Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (3), 172–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487194045003003
  • Fraile, J., Ruiz-Bravo, P., Zamorano-Sande, D., & Orgaz-Rincón, D. (2021). Evaluación formativa, autorregulación, feedback y herramientas digitales: uso de Socrative en educación superior (Formative assessment, self-regulation, feedback and digital tools: use of Socrative in higher education). Retos, 42, 724-734. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87067
  • Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17(2), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/sxbs-0829.
  • Georgakis, S., Wilson, R., & Evans, J. (2015). Authentic Assessment in Physical Education: A case Study of Game Sense Pedagogy. The Physical Educator, 72, 67-86. http://js.sagamorepub.com/pe/article/view/3720
  • Grigore, V., Stănescu, M., Bota, A., Mitrache, G., & Popescu, M. (2007). Role of FISTE in Defining New Perspectives of ICT Application to Physical Education and Sports Area. Revista EducaŃia, 21. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.517.623&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Guillén Gámez, F., & Perrino Peña, M. (2019). Análisis Univariante de la Competencia Digital en Educación Física: un estudio empírico (Univariate Analysis of Digital Competence in Physical Education: an empirical study). Retos, 37, 326-332. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.72052
  • Sancho, M. H., & Pastor, V. M. L. (2014). ¿Es viable llevar a cabo procesos de autoevaluación y evaluación compartida en Educación Física en la etapa de Educación Primaria? un estudio de caso longitudinal (1ª parte). Revista de educación física: Renovar la teoría y práctica, 133, 11-18. https://revistadeeducacionfisica.com/
  • Hitchcock, C. H., Dowrick, P. W., & Prater, M. A. (2003). Video Self-Modeling Intervention in School-Based Settings. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1), 36-45. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4675498.
  • Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 769-781. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10639-014-9353-5
  • Leijen, Ä., Admiraal, W. F., Wildschut, L., & Robert-Jan Simons, P. (2008). Pedagogy before technology: what should an ICT intervention facilitate in practical dance classes?. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923351
  • López-García, N. J. (2016). Evaluación y TIC en Primaria: el uso de Plickers para evaluar habilidades musicales. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 31(2), 81-90. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6535465.
  • López-Pastor, V. M. (2006). Evaluación formativa en Educación Física. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
  • López-Pastor, V. M., Fernández-Balboa, J. M., Santos, M. L., & Fraile, A. (2012). Students’Self-Grading, Professor´s Grading and Negotiated Final Grading at Three University Programmes: Analysis of Reliability and Grade Difference Ranges and Tendencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.545868
  • López-Pastor, V. M., Monjas, R., & Manrique, J. C. (2011). Fifteen years of action-research as professional development. Searching more collaborative, useful and democratic systems for teachers. Educational Action-Research,19(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.569190
  • López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative Assessment in Physical Education: A Review of International Literature. Sport, Education & Society, 18(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
  • Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2014). Making the case for democratic assessment practices within a critical pedagogy of physical education teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13496004
  • Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2015). Student teachers´understanding and application of assessement for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15590352
  • Lund, J. (2012). Assessment and Accountability in Secondary Physical Education. Quest, 44(3), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1992.10484061
  • Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2012). Performance-based Assessment for Middle and High School Physical Education, Champaign, United States: Human Kinetics.
  • MacPhail, A., & Halbert, J. (2010). We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE’: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education. Assessment in Education, 17(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565412
  • Melograno, V. J. (1997). Integrating assessment into Physical Education teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68(7), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1997.10604981
  • Mintah, J. K. (2003). Authentic Assessment in Physical Education: Prevalence of Use and Perceived Impact on Students’ Self-Concept, Motivation, and Skill Achievement. Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 7(3), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0703_03
  • Mintah, J. K. (2017). A cross sectional study of authentic assessment usesamong public school physical education teachers in Ghana. Journal of Physical Education Research, 4(3), 61-70. https://www.joper.org/archives-detail.php?period=12
  • Mohnsen, B. (1997). Authentic Assessment in Physical Education. Learning & Leading with Technology, 24(7), 30-33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ544737.
  • Palao, J. M., Hastie, P. A., Guerrero-Cruz, P., & Ortega, E. (2015). The impact of video technology on student performance in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 51-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.813404
  • Ramos, J. F. (2019). Producción científica sobre integración de TIC a la Educación Física. Estudio bibliométrico en el periodo 1995-2017 (Scientific production on the integration of ICT to Physical Education. Bibliometric study in the period 1995-2017). Retos, 37, 748-754. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.67348
  • Richard, J. F., & Godbout, P. (2000). Formative Assessment as an integral part of the teaching-learning process. Physical and Health Education Journal, 66(3), 4-9. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/article/view/32078.
  • Slingerland, M., Borghouts, L., Jans, L., Weeldenburg, G., Van Dokkum, G., Vos, S., & Haerens, L. (2017). Development and optimisation of an in-service teacher training programme on motivational assessment in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 23(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16639212
  • Sicilia, A., (ed.). (2011). La evaluación y calificación en la Universidad. Relatos autobiográficos durante la búsqueda de alternativas. Barcelona: Hipatia.
  • Sospedra Harding, A. I., Escamilla Fajardo, P., & Aguado Berenguer, S. (2021). Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en Educación Física: un análisis bibliométrico (Information and Communication Technologies in Physical Education: bibliometric analysis). Retos, 42, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87761
  • Tolgfors, B. (2018). Transformative Assessment in Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 25-4, 1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18814863
  • Torrance, H. (2011). Using assessment to drive the reform of schooling: Time to stop pursuing the chimera? British Journal of Educational Studies 59(4), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.620944
  • Torrance, H. (2017). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854
  • Vallejo, M., & Molina, J. (2014). La evaluación auténtica de los procesos educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de educación, 64, 11-25. https://www.academia.edu/download/55900509/rie64a01.pdf.
  • Ward, P., & Lee, M. A. (2005). Peer-Assisted Learning in Physical Education: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 24, 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.24.3.205
  • Weir, T., & Connor, S. (2009). The use of digital video in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18, 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390902992642
  • Zhu, W. (2007) Assessing Kinesiology Students´ Learning in Higher Education. Quest, 59(1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483542