Capital budgeting practices in Spain

  1. Andrés Alonso, Pablo de
  2. Fuente Herrero, Gabriel de la
  3. San Martín, Pablo
Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444,  2340-9436

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 18

Número: 1

Páxinas: 37-56

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2014.08.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Business Research Quarterly

Resumo

This paper seeks to shed further light on the capital budgeting techniques used by Spanish companies. Our paper posits that the gap between theory and practice might be related to the nature of sources of value and to the efficiency of mechanisms aligning managerial and shareholder incentives, rather than to resource restrictions or model misinterpretation. We analyze data from a survey conducted in 2011, the final sample comprising 140 non-financial Spanish firms. Our findings show a behaviour pattern similar to that reported in prior research for firms in other countries. Particularly noteworthy is that payback appears to be the most widely used tool, while real options are used relatively little. Our results confirm that size and industry are related to the frequency of use of certain capital budgeting techniques. Further, we find that the relevance of growth opportunities and flexibility is an important factor explaining the use of real options.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alessandri T.M., Lander D.M., Bettis R.A. Strategic implications of valuation: evidence from valuing growth options. Real Options Theory, Advances in Strategic Management 2007, vol. 24:459-484. Emerald, Greenwich, Connecticut.
  • Alkaraan F., Northcott D. Strategic capital investment decision-making: a role for emergent analysis tools? A study of practice in large UK manufacturing companies. Br. Account. Rev. 2006, 38(2):149-173.
  • Andrés P., Azofra V., Rodríguez J.A. Endeudamiento, oportunidades de crecimiento y estructura contractual: un contraste empírico para el caso español. Investig. Econ. 2000, 24(3):385-417.
  • Ann W.K., Farragher E.J., Leung R.K.C. Capital investment practices: a survey of large corporations in Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 1987, 4(2):112-123.
  • Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Market. Res. 1977, 14(3):396-402.
  • Arnold G.C., Hatzopoulos P.D. The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: evidence from the United Kingdom. J. Bus. Finance Account. 2000, 27(5/6):603-626.
  • Ayala J.C., Rodríguez J.E. Gestión financiera en empresas industriales: análisis empírico de la realidad riojana. Bol. Estud. Econ. 2000, 55(171):543-570.
  • Baker H.K., Dutta S., Saadi S. Corporate finance practices in Canada: where do we stand?. Multinatl. Finance J. 2011, 15(3/4):157-192.
  • Baker H.K., Dutta S., Saadi S. Management views on real options in capital budgeting. J. Appl. Finance 2011, 21(1):18-29.
  • Bennouna K., Meredith G.G., Marchant T. Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada. Manage. Decis. 2010, 28(2):225-247.
  • Bierman H.J. Capital budgeting in 1992: a survey. Financ. Manage. 1993, 22(3):24.
  • Block S. Capital budgeting techniques used by small business firms in the 1990. Eng. Econ. 1997, 42(4):289-302.
  • Block S. Are there differences in capital budgeting procedures between industries? An empirical study. Eng. Econ. 2005, 50(1):55-67.
  • Block S. Are real options actually used in the real world?. Eng. Econ. 2007, 52(3):255-267.
  • Brealey R.A., Myers S.C., Allen F. Principios de Finanzas Corporativas 2010, McGraw-Hill, México.
  • Brennan M.J. Corporate finance over the past 25 years. Financ. Manage. 1995, 24(2):9-22.
  • Brounen D., de Jong A., Koedijk K. Corporate finance in Europe: confronting theory with practice. Financ. Manage. 2004, 33(4):71-101.
  • Burns R., Walker J. Capital budgeting techniques among the Fortune 500: a rationale approach. Manag. Finance 1997, 23(9):3-15.
  • Busby J.S., Pitts C.G.C. Real options in practice: an exploratory survey of how finance officers deal with flexibility in capital appraisal. Manag. Accounting Res. 1997, 8(2):169-186.
  • Chazi A., Terra P.R.S., Zanella F.C. Theory versus practice: perspectives of Middle Eastern financial managers. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2010, 22(2):195-221.
  • Chen S. DCF techniques and nonfinancial measures in capital budgeting: a contingency approach analysis. Behav. Res. Account. 2008, 20(1):13-29.
  • Cohen G., Yagil J. A multinational survey of corporate financial policies. J. Appl. Finance 2007, 17(1):57-69.
  • Connelly B.L., Hoskisson R.E., Tihanyi L., Certo S.T. Ownership as a form of corporate governance. J. Manage. Stud. 2010, 47(8):1561-1589.
  • Copeland T.E. New developments in valuation. Strategic Finance in the 21st Century: 15 Expert Opinions 2000, Royal NIVRA, Amsterdam. W. Verhoog, L. Keuleneer, D. Swagerman (Eds.).
  • Danielson M.G., Scott J.A. The capital budgeting decisions of small businesses. J. Appl. Finance 2006, 16(2):45-56.
  • Drury C., Tayles M. UK capital budgeting practices: some additional survey evidence. Eur. J. Finance 1996, 2(4):371-388.
  • Evans D.A., Forbes S.M. Decision making and display methods: the case of prescription and practice in capital budgeting. Eng. Econ. 1993, 39(1):87-92.
  • Graham J.R., Harvey C.R. The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J. Financ. Econ. 2001, 60(2/3):187-243.
  • Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2012, Pearson Higher Education, Essex.
  • Hall J., Millard S. Capital budgeting practices used by selected listed South African firms. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manage. Sci. 2010, 13(1):85-97.
  • Harris M., Raviv A. The theory of capital structure. J. Finance 1991, 46(1):297-355.
  • Hermes N., Smid P., Yao L. Capital budgeting practices: a comparative study of the Netherlands and China. Int. Bus. Rev. 2007, 16(5):630-654.
  • Holmen M., Pramborg B. Capital budgeting and political risk: empirical evidence. J. Int. Financ. Manage. Account. 2009, 20(2):105-134.
  • Istvan D.F. The economic evaluation of capital expenditures. J. Bus. 1961, 36(1):3-53.
  • Iturralde T., Maseda A. Tamaño de la Empresa y Gestión Financiera. Rev. Eur. Dir. Econ. Empresa 2004, 13(3):183-198.
  • Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 1976, 3:305-360.
  • Jensen M.C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 1986, 76(2):323-329.
  • Jensen M.C. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 1993, 48(3):831-880.
  • Kester W.C. Today's options for tomorrow's Growth. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1984, 62(2):153-160.
  • Kester G., Chang R.P., Echanis E.S., Haikal S., Isa M., Skully M.T., Tsui K., Wang C.J. Capital budgeting practices in the Asia Pacific Region: Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore. Financ. Pract. Educ. 1999, 9(1):25-33.
  • Kim S.H., Crick T., Kim S.H. Do executives practice what academics preach?. Manage. Account. 1986, 68(5):49-52.
  • Klamer T. Empirical evidence of the adoption of sophisticated capital budgeting techniques. J. Bus. 1972, 45(3):387-397.
  • Kulatilaka N. The value of flexibility: the case of a dual-fuel industrial steam boiler. Financ. Manage. 1993, 22(3):271-280.
  • Lander D.M., Pinches G.E. Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 1998, 38(3):537-567.
  • Leon F., Isa M., Kester G. Capital budgeting practices of listed Indonesian companies. Asian J. Bus. Account. 2008, 1(2):175-192.
  • Mao J.C.T. Survey of capital budgeting: theory and practice. J. Finance 1970, 25(2):349-360.
  • Maquieira C.P., Preve L.A., Sarria-Allende V. Theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence and distinctive features in Latin America. Emerg. Markets Rev. 2012, 13(2):118-148.
  • Mathews S., Datar V., Johnson B. A practical method for valuing real options: the boeing approach. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 2007, 19(2):95-104.
  • McConnell J.J., Servaes H. Equity ownership and the two faces of debt. J. Financ. Econ. 1995, 39(1):131-157.
  • McDonald R., Siegel D. The value of waiting to invest. Q. J. Econ. 1986, 101(4):707-727.
  • McDonald R.L. Real options and rules of thumb in capital budgeting. Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition 2000, Oxford University Press, New York. M.J. Brennan, L. Trigeorgis (Eds.).
  • Miguel A., Pindado J., de la Torre C. Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strateg. Manage. J. 2004, 25(12):1119-1207.
  • Miller J.H. A glimpse at practice in calculating and using return on investment. NAA Bull. 1960, 41(10):65-76.
  • Moore J.S., Reichert A.K. An analysis of the financial management techniques currently employed by large U.S. corporations. J. Bus. Finance Account. 1983, 10(4):623-645.
  • Myers S.C. Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financ. Econ. 1977, 5:147-175.
  • Myers S.C. Finance theory and financial strategy. Interfaces 1984, 14(1):126-137.
  • Myers S.C. Fischer Black's contributions to corporate finance. Financ. Manage. 1996, 25(4):95-103.
  • Newton D.P., Pearson A.W. Application of option pricing theory to R&D. R&D Manage. 1994, 24(1):83-89.
  • Palacios F., Rayo S., Herrerías R., Cortés A.M. Las opciones reales en el análisis de proyectos de inversión, Valoración de la flexibilidad estratégica y operativa. Anál. Financ. 2002, 86:38-47.
  • Payne J., Heath W.C., Gale L.R. Comparative financial practice in the US and Canada: capital budgeting and risk assessment techniques. Financ. Pract. Educ. 1999, 9(1):16-24.
  • Pereiro L.E. The practice of investment valuation in emerging markets: evidence from Argentina. J. Multinatl. Financ. Manage. 2006, 16(2):160-183.
  • Pike R. A longitudinal survey on capital budgeting practices. J. Bus. Finance Account. 1996, 23(1):79-92.
  • Pindyck R. Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. Am. Econ. Rev. 1988, 78(5):969-985.
  • Rappaport A. Creating Shareholder Value: A Guide for Managers and Investors 1997, Free Press, New York.
  • Rayo S., Cortés A.M. Valoración de Proyectos de Inversión con Opciones Reales. Fundamentos Matemáticos, Financieros y Evidencia Empírica 2007, Editorial Universidad de Granada, Granada.
  • Rayo S., Cortés A.M., Sáez J.L. Valoración empírica de las Opciones de Crecimiento. El caso de la Gran Empresa Española. Rev. Eur. Dir. Econ. Empresa 2007, 16(2):147-166.
  • Ryan P., Ryan G. Capital budgeting practices of the Fortune 1000: how have things changed?. J. Bus. Manage. 2002, 8(4):355-364.
  • Sandahl G., Sjögren S. Capital budgeting methods among Sweden's largest groups of companies. The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2003, 84(1):51-69.
  • Schall L.D., Sundem G.L. Capital budgeting methods and risk: a further analysis. Financ. Manage. 1980, 9(1):7-13.
  • Schall L.D., Sundem G.L., Geijsbeek W.J. Survey and analysis of capital budgeting methods. J. Finance 1978, 33(1):281-287.
  • Shinoda T. Capital budgeting management practices in Japan: a focus on the use of capital budgeting methods. Econ. J. Hokkaido Univ. 2010, 39:39-50.
  • Sridharan U.V., Schuele U. Budget size and risk perception in capital budgeting decisions of German managers. Int. Rev. Bus. Res. Pap. 2008, 4(3):213-221.
  • Stanley M.T., Block S. A survey of multinational capital budgeting. Financ. Rev. 1984, 19(1):36-54.
  • Trahan E.A., Gitman L.J. Bridging the theory-practice gap in corporate finance: a survey of chief financial officers. Q Rev Econ Finance 1995, 35(1):73-84.
  • Triantis A. Realizing the potential of real options: does theory meet practice?. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 2005, 17(2):8-16.
  • Truong G., Partington G., Peat M. Cost-of-capital estimation and capital-budgeting practice in Australia. Aust. J. Manage. 2008, 33(1):95-122.
  • Velez I., Nieto G. Investment decision-making practices in Colombia: a survey. Interfaces 1986, 16(4):60-65.
  • Verbeeten F.H.M. Do organizations adopt sophisticated capital budgeting practices to deal with uncertainty in the investment decision? A research note. Manage. Account. Res. 2006, 17(1):106-120.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet