Lecciones aprendidas sobre la interdisciplinariedad en educación

  1. Fco. Javier Gómez González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Cuadernos de pedagogía

ISSN: 0210-0630,  2386-6322

Ano de publicación: 2022

Número: 527

Páxinas: 78-84

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Cuadernos de pedagogía

Resumo

The article makes a study of the concept of interdisciplinarity, describing its evolution since the first proposals made by Jean Piaget in the 70s. The different interpretations that this term has had in each historical moment are briefly pointed out. After this historical analysis, the article consolidates the main lessons learned over the years of promoting interdisciplinarity.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Apostel, L. et. al. (1983). Interdisciplinariedad y ciencias humanas, Madrid: UNESCO Técnos.
  • Biancani,S., Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A. and Smith, S. (2018) Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers. Research Policy, Volume 47, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 543-557
  • Cohen, W. M.; Fjeld, J. (2016). The three legs of a stool: Comment on Richard Nelson, «The sciences are different and the differences matter». Research Policy, 45 (2016) Pages 1708-1712
  • Dogan, M. (1996). The Hybridization of Social Science Knowledge. Library Trends vol. 45, N.o 2, pp. 296-314.
  • European Advisory Board (2004). Interdisciplinarity in Research, Eurab 04. 009 Final.
  • Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T. & Mitcham, K. (Eds) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gélineau, L. (2002). L´Interdisciplinarité et la recherche sociale appliquée. Réflexions sur des expériences en cours, Montreal: Université de Montreal y Université Laval.
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Thousand Oaks, Nueva Delhi, Londres: SAGE.
  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  • Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Martin, B. R. (2016). Introduction to discussion paper on The sciences are different and the differences are important, Research Policy, 45 (2016) 1691
  • Morin, E. (1981). El Método 1. La Naturaleza de la Naturaleza, Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Nelson, R. R. (2016). The sciences are different and the differences matter, Research Policy, 45 (2016) Pages 1692-1701
  • Piaget, J. (1972). «L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires» , en OCDE, L’interdisciplinarité problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les universités, París: OCDE.
  • Weingart, P., Stehr, N. ed. (2000). Practising Interdisciplinarity, pp. 3-24. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Whitley, R. (2016). Varieties of scientific knowledge and their contributions to dealing with policy problems: A response to Richard Nelson’s «The sciences are different and the differences matter», Research Policy, 45 (2016), Pages 1702-1707.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet