The effect of transaction costs in CO2 marketsan Agent-based model approach

  1. Posada Calvo, Marta
  2. Hernández Iglesias, Cesáreo
Revista:
Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

ISSN: 1132-175X

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 42

Páginas: 83-89

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37610/DYO.V0I42.352 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

Referencias bibliográficas

  • FARMER J.D.and FOLEY, D. (2009). «The Economy needs Agent-Based Modelling». Nature, 460, pp. 685-686.
  • GJERSTAD, S.; DICKHAUT, J. (1998) «Price Formation in Double Auctions». Games and Economic Behaviour, 22, pp 1-29.
  • GJERSTAD, S. (2007). «The Competitive Market Paradox». Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, pp. 1753-1780.
  • GODE, D. and SUNDER S. (1993). «Allocative Efficiency of Market with Zero-Intelligent Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality». Journal of Political Economy, 101, pp 119-137.
  • LICALZI, M. and PELLIZZARI, P. (2008a). «Simple Market Protocols for Efficient Risk Sharing». Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, pp 3568-3590.
  • LICALZI, M. and PELLIZZARI, P. (2008b). «Zero-Intelligence Trading without Resampling». Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 614, pp. 3-14.
  • MILL, J.S. (1848). «The Principles of Political Economy with some of their applications to social philosophy».
  • POSADA, M.; HERNÁNDEZ, C. and LÓPEZ-PAREDES, A. (2006). «Learning in a Continuous Double Auction Market». Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 564, pp. 41-51.
  • POSADA, M.; HERNÁNDEZ, C. and LÓPEZ-PAREDES, A. (2008) «Emissions Permits Auctions: An Agent Based Model Analysis». In Edmonds, Hernández and Troitzsch (eds.) Social Simulation: Technologies, Advances and New Discoveries.
  • POSADA, M. and HERNÁNDEZ, C. (2010). «The Effect of Transaction Costs on Ar tificial Continuous Double Auction Markets». Lecture notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 645, pp 65-74.
  • POSADA, M. and LOPEZ-PAREDES, A. (2008). «How to Choose the Bidding Strategy in Continuous Double Auctions: Imitation versus Take-The-Best Heuristics». Journal of Ar tificial Societies and Social Simulation 11 (1) 6 http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/6.html.
  • RUST, J.; MILLER, J. and PALMER, R. (1993). «Behaviour of Trading Automata in Computerized Double Auctions». In Friedman and Rust (eds.), The Double Auction Markets: Institutions, Theories And Evidence. Addison-Wesley.
  • SMITH, V.L. (1962). «An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior» in Journal of Political Economy, 70, pp. 111-137.
  • SMITH, V.L. (1982). «Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science». American Economic Review, 72, pp. 923–955.
  • SMITH, V.L. and WILLIAMS, A. (1990). «The Boundaries of Competitive Price Theory: Convergence, Expectation and Transaction Costs». In Green and Kagel eds. Advances in behavioral economics, 2, pp. 3-35.
  • STAVINS, R. (1995). «Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, pp. 133-148.