Guía de recomendaciones para el manejo de brolucizumab

  1. A. Fonollosa 12
  2. R. Gallego-Pinazo 3
  3. L. Sararols 48
  4. A. Adán 910
  5. M. López-Gálvez 567
  6. M.S. Figueroa 711
  1. 1 Hospital de Cruces
    info

    Hospital de Cruces

    Barakaldo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03nzegx43

  2. 2 Instituto Oftalmológico Bilbao, Bilbao, España
  3. 3 Unidad de Mácula y Ensayos Clínicos, Clínica Oftalvist, Valencia, España
  4. 4 Hospital General de Granollers
    info

    Hospital General de Granollers

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0190kj665

  5. 5 Hospital Universitario de Valladolid
    info

    Hospital Universitario de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04fffmj41

  6. 6 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  7. 7 Hospital Ramón y Cajal
    info

    Hospital Ramón y Cajal

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/050eq1942

  8. 8 Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, España
  9. 9 Hospital Clinic Barcelona
    info

    Hospital Clinic Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02a2kzf50

  10. 10 Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer
    info

    Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/054vayn55

  11. 11 Unidad de Retina, Clínica Baviera, Madrid, España
Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 97

Issue: 11

Pages: 626-638

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2022.02.006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Abstract

Purpose Brolucizumab, a new generation anti-VEGF, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in AMD in the pivotal HAWK and HARRIER trials. Post-marketing, previously undetected adverse events related to intraocular inflammation have been reported. An independent post hoc review of the pivotal trials puts the rate of intraocular inflammation (IOI) at 4.6%. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of recommendations for implementing the management of brolucizumab in clinical practice. Method The recommendations made by the authors are based on their clinical experience and critical review of (i) the pivotal trials; (ii) the post-hoc analysis of the Safety Review Committee, and (iii) the published literature. Results In the pivotal trials, brolucizumab showed sustained functional gains, superior anatomical outcomes with potentially longer intervals between injections and a well-tolerated overall safety profile. Adverse events reported post-marketing include retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Based on the available information, experts recommend (i) ruling out non-recommended patient profiles (prior history of ORI); (ii) screening the patient prior to each injection to rule out active IOI; (iii) monitoring the patient for early warning signs, and (iv) treating immediately should any adverse events develop. Conclusions The adverse events reported are rare, but may be associated with severe and irreversible loss of visual acuity. The recommendations made are intended to facilitate the management of brolucizumab in the routine practice of retinologists, to ensure patient safety and, should any adverse events occur, to minimise their impact on vision.