Incidencia en los dobles estándares sexualesmovilizaciones a favor de la mujer y factores religiosos

  1. González Marugán, Emma M. 1
  2. Marugán de Miguelsanz, Montserrat 1
  1. 1 Psicóloga clínica Servicio de Salud Mental
Revista:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: El mundo al Encuentro. Una reflexión sobre la Educación

Volumen: 1

Número: 1

Páginas: 65-74

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2022.N1.V1.2310 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Throughout history there have been differences regarding the sexual behavior of men and women. This has led to a sexual double standard (SDS) with more restricted sexual standards for women. On March 8, 2018, the largest social mobilization in favor of women in recent decades took place in Spain. The present study provides results on SDS before and after these mobilizations. Data were taken from a total sample of 531 university students along the years 2015-2019. Results are analyzed in two periods: from a previous sample corresponding to 2015-2017, before mobilizations, and from a second sample for the years 2018-2019, after mobilizations. Results of the first period indicate important differences in SDS between genders. Thus, the score of men is significantly higher and therefore much more restrictive with regards to female sexual behavior. After the mobilizations, inter-gender differences are significantly reduced: the 21.6% of the total sample of students believe that mobilizations have had a strong or very strong influence on their evaluation of sexuality on the SDSS scale (the Sexual Double Standard Scale), while the 16% and the 42% of the sample consider, respectively, that mobilizations have had a medium influence or have not had any influence on them. We show that the students who attend religious practices more frequently (1 to 7 times per week) obtain the highest mean in SDS. Thus, this variable is a possible influencing factor in the permanence of differential and restrictive attitudes regarding SDS. Our study also shows that it is necessary to create a deep reflection among young people about SDS and the influencing factors such as people’s characteristics and social factors, and that it is also needed to incorporate virtual networks and the relationships that derive from them in the field of sexuality

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Axinn, W.G, Young-De Marco, L. y Ro, M.C. (2011). Gender double standards in parenting actitudes. Social Sci. Research, 40, 417-432. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.010
  • Berrocal, M.D.G., Vallejo-Medina, P., Moyano, N. y Sierra, J.C. (2019). Sexual Double Standard: a psychometric study from a macropsichological perspective among the Spanish heterosexual population. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1869. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01869
  • Caro, C., y Monreal, M. C. (2017). Creencias del amor romántico y violencia de género. Revista INFAD De Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 2(1), 47–56. doi:10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v2.917.
  • Delegación del Gobierno para la violencia de género (2018). Percepción social de la violencia sexual. Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes e Igualdad. 25 Colección contra la violencia de género. Documentos.
  • Diéguez KL, Sueiro E y López F (2003). The Sexual Double Standard y variables relacionadas. Cuadernos de Medicina Psicosomática y Psiquiatría de Enlace, 67/68, 79-88.
  • González-Marugán, E., Felipe, M.E, Marugán, M. y Martín, L.J. (2021). Are women still judged by their sexual behaviour? Prevalenceand problemslinked to sexual doubléstandard amongst universitystudents. Sexuality & Culture, 25 (6), 1927-1945. doi:10.1007/s12119-021-09857-2
  • Legido-Marín, S. y Sierra, J.C. (2010); Evaluación de conductas sexuales agresivas en estudiantes universitarios españoles. Propiedades psicométricas del Agressive Sexual Behavior Inventory, Boletín de Psicología, 98, 23-40.
  • Marks, M.J., Young, T.M. y Zaikman, Y. (2019). The sexual Double Standar in the Real word. Social psychology, 50, 67-79. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000362
  • Muehlenhard, C.L. y Quackenbush, D. M. (1988). Sexual Double Standard Scale. En C.M. Davis, W.L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Scherer y S.L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 186-188). London: Sage.
  • Paynter, A. y Leaper, C. (2016). Heterosexual Dating Double Standars in Undergraduate Women and Men. Sex Roles, 75, 393-406. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0628-8
  • Pereira Alvesi, M., Amancio, L., y Rodríguez Alferes, V. (2008). Género e representaôes sociais: Duplo-padrâo sexual em funcâo da religiâo e da posiçiâo política. Psicología, vol. XXII (2), 139-160. ISSN 0874-2049
  • Seabrook, R.C., Ward, L.M. Cortina, L.M., et al. (2017). Girl Power or Powerless Girl? Televisión, Sexual Scripts, and Sexual Agency in Sexually Active Young Women. Psichologý of Women Quarterly, 41, 240-253. doi:10.1177/0361684316677028
  • Sierra, J., Ortega, V. y Gutiérrez-Quintanilla, J. (2008). Encuesta de opinión sexual: fiabilidad, validez y datos normativos de una versión reducida en muestras salvadoreñas. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25 (1), 139-150.
  • Soller, B. y Haynie, D.L. (2017). Variation in Sexual Double Standards: How Do They Matter for Adolescent Sexual Behavior?. Sociological Perspectives, 60, 702-721. doi:10.1177%2F0731121416668865
  • Tapia, S. I. (2015). Violencia de género en las universidades o la necesidad de una intervención educativa. Revista INFAD de Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 1(1), 531–544. doi:10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n1.v1.46
  • Torres, N. del M., y Díaz-López, M. P. (2017). Género en el discurso: discriminación. Maltrato a la mujer. Revista INFAD De Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 4(1), 267–276. doi:10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v4.1056
  • Zaikman, Y., y Marks, M.J. (2014). Ambivalent Sexism and the Sexual Double Standard. Sex Roles, 71, 333-344. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0417-1
  • Zaikman, Y., Marks, M.J. y Zeiber, J. (2016). Gender roles violations and the Sexual Double Standard. J. Homosex, 63, 1608-1629. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1158007
  • Zaikman, Y. y Mark, J.M. (2017). Promoting Theory-Based Perspectives in Sexual Double Standard Research. Sex Roles, 76, 407-420. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016- 0677-z
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet