Combining the Knowledge Appropriation Model and epistemic networks to understand co-creation and adoption of learning designs using log data

  1. Rodríguez-Triana, María Jesús 1
  2. Prieto, Luis P. 1
  3. Ley, Tobias 1
  4. Gillet, Denis 2
  5. de Jong, Ton 3
  1. 1 Tallinn University (Estonia)
  2. 2 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Switzerland)
  3. 3 Twente University (Netherlands)
Revista:
Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

ISSN: 1135-9250

Ano de publicación: 2020

Título do exemplar: Codiseño de situaciones educativas enriquecidas con TIC

Número: 74

Páxinas: 190-205

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.21556/EDUTEC.2020.74.1789 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

Resumo

Social practices are well-known mediators in the adoption of educational innovations during professional learning, as postulated by the Knowledge Appropriation Model (KAM). However, understanding how teachers adopt new pedagogical approaches at scale is often difficult due to the lack of evidence available about their daily practices. In that sense, log data from online authoring and learning tools offer the possibility of better understanding the creation process of a learning design that reifies an educational innovation.  This paper explores how statistical models and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) can help us understand large-scale patterns in the co-creation and adoption of educational innovations, using KAM as a theoretical framework to analyse log data. More concretely, this paper presents a case study on Go-Lab, an initiative to promote inquiry-based learning at school. Its authoring and learning tool -Graasp- gives us a unique opportunity to track, not only the (co)creation of learning designs, but also their potential implementation in the classroom. The case study uses the aforementioned methodological approach to analyse the role of large-scale support initiatives in the co-creation and adoption of learning designs.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Buckingham Shum, S., Echeverria, V., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). The Multimodal Matrix as a quantitative ethnography methodology. International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography, 26–40. 10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_3
  • Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social Learning Analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 3–26.
  • Cai Z., Siebert-Evenstone A., Eagan B., Shaffer D.W., Hu X., Graesser A.C. (2019) nCoder+: A Semantic Tool for Improving Recall of nCoder Coding. In: Eagan B., Misfeldt M., Siebert-Evenstone A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_4
  • Fuentes-Hurtado, M., & Martínez, J. G. (2019). Evaluación inicial del diseño de unidades didácticas STEM gamificadas con TIC. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 70, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.70.1469
  • Gaševic, D., Joksimovic, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003
  • Hernández-Leo, D., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Pardo, A., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., & Rodríguez-Triana, M. J. (2019). Analytics for learning design: A layered framework and tools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12645
  • Karumbaiah, S., Baker, R. S., Barany, A., & Shute, V. (2019). Using epistemic networks with automated codes to understand why players quit levels in a learning game. International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography, (106–116).
  • Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43 (2), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
  • Klamma, R. (2013). Community Learning Analytics – Challenges and Opportunities BT - Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013. In J.-F. Wang & R. Lau (Eds.) (pp. 284–293). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Leoste, J., Tammets, K., & Ley, T. (2019). Co-creating learning designs in professional teacher education: Knowledge appropriation in the teacher’s innovation laboratory. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 42, 131–163. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/42_7.pdf
  • Leung, W.-C. (2002). Why is evidence from ethnographic and discourse research needed in medical education: The case of problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 24 (2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220125268
  • Ley, T., Maier, R., Thalmann, S., Waizenegger, L., Pata, K., & Ruiz-Calleja, A. (2020). A knowledge appropriation model to connect scaffolded learning and knowledge maturation in workplace learning settings. Vocations and Learning, 13 (1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09231-2
  • Michos K, Hernández-Leo D. Understanding collective behavior of learning design communities. In: Verbert K, Sharples M, Klobučar T T. Adaptive and adaptable learning. Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL); 2016 Sept. 13-16; Lyon, France. Springer; 2016. p. 614-7. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9891). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_75
  • Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46 (2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12273
  • Rodríguez-Triana M.J., Holzer A., Vozniuk A., Gillet D. (2015) Orchestrating Inquiry-Based Learning Spaces: An Analysis of Teacher Needs. In: Li F., Klamma R., Laanpere M., Zhang J., Manjón B., Lau R. (Eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning -- ICWL 2015. ICWL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9412. Springer, Cham. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_12
  • Rodríguez-Triana, M.J, Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., De Jong, T., & Gillet, D. (2019). Tracing teacher collaborative learning and innovation adoption: A case study in an inquiry learning platform. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoue, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings - 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2019 - Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 432-439). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://www.cscl2019.com/upload/pdf/CSCL-2019-Volume-1.pdf
  • Ruiz-Calleja, A., Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., & Dennerlein, S. (2017). Learning analytics for professional and workplace learning: A literature review. In Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education - 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2017, Proceedings (Vol. 10474 LNCS, pp. 164-178). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 10474 LNCS). Springer Verlag Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_13
  • Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart press.
  • Shaffer, D. W., & Serlin, R. C. (2004). What good are statistics that don’t generalize? Educational Researcher, 33(9), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033009014
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Vuorikari R. et al. (2011) ICT-Based School Collaboration, Teachers’ Networks and their Opportunities for Teachers’ Professional Development - A Case Study on eTwinning. In: Leung H., Popescu E., Cao Y., Lau R.W.H., Nejdl W. (Eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2011. ICWL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7048. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_12
  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.