Controversies on the Empirical Significance of Auxiliary Assumptions

  1. Caamaño Alegre, María 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Zeitschrift:
Philosophia: anuario de Filosofía

ISSN: 0328-9672,  2313-9528

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Ausgabe: 80

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 9-39

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Philosophia: anuario de Filosofía

Zusammenfassung

Theoretical laws need to be conjoined with auxiliary assumptions in order to be empirically testable, whether in natural or social science. A particularly heated debate has been developing over the nature and role of these assumptions in economic theories. The so called “F(riedman)-Twist” (“the more significant the theory, the more unrealistic the assumptions”, Friedman 1953) as well as some later criticisms by authors like Musgrave, Lawson, Mäki and Cartwright will be examined. I will explore the apparent conflict between the Popperian desideratum to pursue the independent testability of auxiliary assumptions and the idealizational theoretical means needed to isolate causal variables.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Citas Borbone, Giacomo & Brzechczyn, Krzysztof, "The Role of Models in Science: An Introduction", in Idealization XIV: Models in Science, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Volume 108, ed. Giacomo Borbone & Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Boston: Brill/Rodopi, 2016), 1-10.
  • Cartwright, Nancy, "Are RCTs the Gold Standard?" BioSocieties (Special Issue: The Construction and Governance of Randomised Controlled Trials) 2/1, March (2007a): 11-20.
  • Cartwright, Nancy, "The Vanity of Rigour in Economics: Theoretical Models and Galilean Experiments", in Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics, by: Nancy Cartwright (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007b), 217-261.
  • Duhem, Pierre, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1906/1991).
  • Friedman, Milton, "The Methodology of Positive Economics", in Essays in Positive Economics, by Milton Friedman (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953/1966), 3-16, 30-43.
  • Hanzel, Igor, "The Inherent Type of Scientific Law, The Idealized Types of Scientific Law", in Idealization XIV: Models in Science, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Volume 108, ed. Giacomo Borbone & Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Boston: Brill/Rodopi, 2016), 43-62.
  • Heckman, James J. & Singer, Burton, "Abducting Economics", American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 107/5 (2017): 298–302.
  • Lakatos, Imre, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).
  • Lawson, Tony, "Applied Economics, Contrast Explanation and Asymmetric Explanation", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33/4 (2009): 405–19.
  • Lawson, Tony, "Central Fallacies of Modern Economics", in Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics. Virtues and Economics, vol. 3, ed. Peter Róna & László Zsolnai (Cham: Springer, 2018), 51-68.
  • Mäki, Uskali & Piimies, Jukka-Pekka, "Ceteris paribus", in The Handbook of Economic Methodology, ed. Davis, John B., Hands, D. Wades & Mäki, Uskali (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998), 55-59.
  • Mäki, Uskali, "Kinds of Assumptions and Their Truth: Shaking an Untwisted F-Twist", Kyklos, 53/3 (2000): 303-322.
  • Mäki, Uskali, "Ceteris Paribus: Interpretaciones e Implicaciones", Revista Asturiana de Economía, 28 (2003): 7-32.
  • Mäki, Uskali, "Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models", in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, ed. Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 68-98.
  • Musgrave, Alan, "’Unreal Assumptions’ in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted", Kyklos, 34/3 (1981): 377-87.
  • Nagel, Ernest, "Assumptions in Economic Theory", The American Economic Review, 53/2, May (1963): 211-219.
  • Popper, Karl, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Routledge, 1935/2002).
  • Popper, Karl, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (London: Routledge, 1963).
  • Quine, Willard Van Orman, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", in From a Logical Point of View, by Willard Van Orman Quine (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1951/1953), 20-46.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet