Lifestyle and clinical factors affecting the quality of life related to health

  1. de Cuevillas García, Begoña 1
  2. Navas-Carretero, Santiago 1
  3. Fernández- Montero, Alejandro 2
  4. Cuervo, Marta 1
  5. Martínez, J. Alfredo 1
  1. 1 Department of Nutrition, Food Science, Physiology and Toxicology, Centro de Investigación en Nutrición, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra
  2. 2 Área de Medicina del Trabajo del Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales. Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra
Revista:
Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

ISSN: 2529-850X

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 4

Número: 2

Páginas: 159-171

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.19230/JONNPR.2887 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

Resumen

Background. Few studies have examined the influence of personal, phenotypical and lifestyle habits on quality of life related to health.Methods. Cross-sectional study, which was conducted on 106 patients (63 women). Quality of life was measured by the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire while lifestyle factors were evaluated with a  general questionnaire developed by the authors of the study, with the Mediterranean Diet Adherence  Screener (MEDAS) and with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Participants were divided  into two groups (lower and higher global health) attended to their punctuation on the SF-36.Results. The 8 domains of the SF-36, quantifying the quality of life, were influenced by sex and age. A total of 51 out 106 were qualified as lower global health (score lower than 84.8 points). No  significant differences were found how lifestyle factors, body composition and blood biomarkers affect the  quality of life between groups. The three dimensions of the SF-36 and the transition of health question  were not  significantly influenced by any of the items analyzed.Conclusion. This research enabled us to obtain a pilot vision of the lifestyle of the population and the planning of future research despite that the outcomes were not sufficient satisfactory. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Martínez González MA, Alonso Á, Bes-Rastrollo M, Alegre Garrido F. Conceptos de salud pública y estrategias preventivas : un manual para ciencias de la salud. Barcelona : Elsevier España, S.L.; 2013
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud. Constitución de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Doc básicos [Internet]. 2006;Suplemento:20. Available from: http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_sp.pdf
  • Gisbert JP, Calvet X, Ferrándiz J et al. Manejo del paciente con dispepsia. Guía de práctica clínica. Atención Primaria. 2012;44(12):728– 33.
  • World HEalth Organization. Helath Education Unit. Life-styles and health. Soc. Sci. Med. (Great Bretain). 1986; 22 (2):117-24.
  • Comission of Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation. World Health Organization [Internet]. 2008;246. Available from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/final_report/csdh_finalreport_2 008.pdf
  • Gavidia Catalán V, Talavera M. La construcción del concepto de salud. Didáctica las Ciencias Exp y Soc [Internet]. 2012;0(26):161–75. Available from: http://ojs.uv.es/index.php/dces/article/view/1935
  • Alonso J. La Medida de la Calidad de Vida Relacionada con la Salud en la Investigación y la Práctica Clínica. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2000;14(2):163–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911100714506? via%3Dihub
  • Ruiz M, Pardo A. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud: definición y utilización en la práctica médica. PharmacoEconomics Spanish Res Artic [Internet]. 2014;2(1):31–43. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03320897
  • Badía X, Alonso J. La medida de la salud. Guía de escalas de medición en español. 4a edición. Unión Editorial, editor. Barcelona; 2007.
  • Vilagut G, Valderas JM, Montserrat F. Interpretación de los cuestionarios de salud SF 36 y SF 12 en España: Componentes físico y mental. Med Clin. 2008;130(19):726–35.
  • Obidoa C, Reisine S, Cherniack M. How Does the SF 36 Perform in Healthy Populations? A Structured Review of Longitudinal Studies. J Soc Behav Heal Sci [Internet]. 2010;4(1):30–48. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228706259_How_Does_the_S F-36_Perform_in_Healthy_Populations_A_Structured_Review_of_Longitudi nal_St udies
  • WHO. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire [Internet]. 2014;1-22. Available from:http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/resources/GPAQ_Analy sis_Gui de.pdf
  • Hebestreit K, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Engel C, Vetter W, Siniatchkin M, Erickson N, et al. Validation of the German version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):1–10.
  • Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of canadians. Minist Natl Heal Welf. 1981;76.
  • García H, Vera C, Lugo L. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en Medellín y área metropolitana, con aplicación del SF-36. Rev Fac Nac Salud. 2014;32(1):26–39.
  • Han TS, Tijhuis MAR, Lean MEJ, et al. Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(12):1814–20.
  • Sanchez-Villegas A, Ara I, Martínez-González MA, et al. Physical activity during leisure time and quality of life in a Spanish cohort: SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) Project. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(6):443–8.
  • De La Cruz-Sánchez E, Moreno-Contreras MI, Pino-Ortega J, et al. Actividad física durante el tiempo libre y su relación con algunos indicadores de salud mental Actividad física durante el tiempo libre y su relación con algunos indicadores de salud mental en España. Salud Mental. 2011;4534(1):45–52.
  • Guitérrez-Bedmar M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Martínez-Gonzalez MA. et al. Smoking status, Changes in smoking status and health-related quality of life: Findings from the SUN (“Seguimiento universidad de Navarra”) cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(1):310–20.
  • Herrold AA, Pape TL-B, Li X, et al. Association Between Alcohol Craving and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Veterans With Co- occurring Conditions. Mil Med [Internet]. 2017;182(7):e1712–7. Available from: http://militarymedicine.amsus.org/doi/10.7205/MILMED- D-16-00360
  • Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE. Using the SF-36 with older adults: A cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001;30(4):337–43.
  • Muller-Nordhorn J. Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart [Internet]. 2004;90(5):523–7. Available from: http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/hrt.2003.013995
  • Päivärinne V, Kautiainen H, Heinonen A, Kiviranta I. Relations between subdomains of physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, and quality of life in young adult men. Scand J Med Sci Sports [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1 [cited 2018 Aug 6];28(4):1389–96. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/sms.13003
  • Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health- related quality of life in the general adult population: A systematic review. Prev Med (Baltim). 2007;45(6):401–15.
  • Barcones-Molero MF, Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González MA, et al. The influence of obesity and weight gain on quality of life according to the SF-36 for individuals of the dynamic follow-up cohort of the University of Navarra. Rev Clin Esp. 2018;218 (8):408-416.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet