A propósito de Frankenstein y el autómata de san Alberto Magno… o de por qué la belleza humana no es asunto de robots

  1. Pradier Sebastián, Adrián 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Journal:
Cuadernos de pensamiento

ISSN: 0214-0284 2660-6070

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Humanismo y técnica, volumen 1

Issue: 35

Pages: 139-166

Type: Article

DOI: 10.51743/CPE.338 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de pensamiento

Abstract

The field of anthropomorphic social robotics is one of the most interesting territories for contemporary philosophical reflection, since it brings together anthropological, ethical and aesthetic issues. Taking as a starting point the medieval legend of the automaton of St. Albert the Great, this paper points out the risks associated with the robotic mimicry of human being when theoretical assumptions about it are deflationary of its complexity. I first present a summary of the “uncanny valley” phenomenon as an aesthetic response of rejection to those robotic designs that devalue human complexity, formally and behaviorally; then we study the most accepted solutions from an engineering point of view, based on designs of appearance according to an abstract rather than an imitative principle; finally, thinking about an artistic example of robotic performativity, we argue the irreducible character of human beauty and creativity against their attempts at robotic imitation.

Bibliographic References

  • Anzulewicz, H. (2011). Magie im Verstândnis Alberts des Grossen. En I. Atucha, D. Calma, C. König-Pralong & I. Zavattero (eds.). Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach (pp. 419-431). Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales.
  • Bartneck, Ch., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. y Hagita, N. (2009). My robotic Doppelgänger. A critical look at the Uncanny Valley. En RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 269-276). I.E.E.E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326351
  • Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C., and Lee, D. (2006). Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human-robot interaction design. En RO-MAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 469-474). I.E.E.E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314372
  • Borgnet, A. (ed.) (1890). B. Alberti Magni Ratisbonensis Episcopi, Ordinis Praedicatorum, Opera Omnia, ex editione Lugdunensi religiose castigata, etc. (5 vols). Ludovicum Vivès, Bibliolam Editorem.
  • Budd, M. (2014). La apreciación estética de la naturaleza. Antonio Machado Libros. Publicación original de 2002.
  • Burgar C, Lum P, Shor P, van der Loos, H. (2002). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Standford Experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 6(37): 663-673.
  • Compagni, V.P. (ed.) (1992). Cornelius Agrippa. De Occulta Philosophia Libri Tres. E.J. Brill.
  • Diel, A., Weigelt, S. y MacDorman, K. F. (2022). A meta-analysis of the uncanny valley’s independent and dependent variables. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11(1), 1-33.
  • Diehl, J.J., Schmitt, L.M., Villano, M. y Crowell, Ch. (2012). The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 249-262.
  • Ishiguro, H. y Nishio, Shuichi (2018). Building artificial humans to understand humans. En Geminoid Studies. Science and Technologies for Humanlike Teleoperated Androids (pp. 21-38). Springer.
  • Jochum, E. y Goldberg, K. (2016). Cultivating the uncanny: The Telegarden and other oddities. En Herath, D., Kroos, Ch. y Stelarc (eds.). Robots and Art. Exploring an Unlikely Simbiosis (pp. 149-176). Springer.
  • Kang, M. & Halliburton, B. (2020). The Android of Albertus Magnus: a legend of artificial neing. En Cave, S., Dihal, K. y Dillon, S. (eds.). AI Narratives. A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines (pp. 72-94). Oxford University Press.
  • Kant, I. (2003). Crítica del discernimiento. A. Machado Libros. Original de 1790.
  • MacDorman, K. F. (2019). La Vallée de l’Étrange de Masahiro Mori. e-Phaïstos [En línea], 7(2): consultado el 27 de julio de 2022. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ephaistos/5333; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ephaistos.5333
  • Mahoney, R.M., Machiel van der Loos, H.F., Lum, P.S. y Burgar, C. (2003). Robotic stroke therapy assistant. Robotica, 21(1), 33-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574702004617
  • Marcos, A. La inteligencia artificial y el efecto Toy Story. Proyecto SCIO Red de investigaciones filosóficas José Sanmartín Esplugues. https://proyectoscio.ucv.es/actualidad/la-inteligencia-artificial-y-el-efecto-toy-story-por-a-marcos/
  • Matarić, M.J., Eriksson, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J. y Winstein, C.J. (2007). Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-5
  • Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley (K.F. MacDorman & Norri Kageki, trans.). IEEE Robotics and Automation, 19(2), 98–100. Publicación original de 1970.
  • Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F. & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19: 98–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
  • Paré, Z. (2012). Le Bouddha dans le robot. Rencontre avec le professeur Masahiro Mori. Gradhiva 15: 162-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/gradhiva.2393
  • Parsons, G. y Carlson, A. (2008). Functional beauty. Clarendon Press.
  • Penny Cyclopaedia (1835). Charles Knight.
  • Platt, I. (1822). The book of curiosities;, or, Wonders of the great world: Containing an account of whatever is most remarkable in nature & art, science & literature. Caxton Press.
  • Pradier, A. (2021). Arte, estética y robots: para una filosofía de la interacción. Humanidades: revista de la Universidad de Montevideo, 10: 173-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25185/10.7
  • Pradier, A. (2019). Robótica, estética y antropología: problematizando el diseño antropomórfico. En Chillón, J.M., Martínez, Á. y Frontela, P. (eds.). Hombre y logos. Antropología y comunicación (pp. 305-320). Fragua.
  • Quintanilla, M.Á. (2017). Tecnología: un enfoque filosófico y otros ensayos de filosofía de la tecnología. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Original de 2005.
  • Reilly, K. (2011). Automata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre History. Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Resnick, I.M. (2013). A Companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences. Brill.
  • Richardson, K. (2015). An Anthropology of robots and AI. Annihilation anxiety and machines. Routledge.
  • Saleh, M.A., Hashim, H., Mohamed, N.N., Almisreb, A.A. y Durakovic, B. (2020). Robots and autistic children: a review. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 8(3), 1247-1262.
  • Shelley, M.W. (1818). Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus (3 vols.) Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavoy, & Jones.
  • Sone, Y. (2017). Japanese robot culture. Performance, imagination, and Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sturlese, L. (1980). Saints et magiciens: Albert le Grand en face d’Hermès Trismégiste. Archives de Philosophie, 43(4), 615-634. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43034376
  • Tostado, A. (1728). Commentaria in secundam partem Numerorum, cum indicibus copiosissimis (2 vols.). Venetiis ex typographya Belloniana.
  • Trías, E. (2001). Lo bello y lo siniestro. Ariel. Original de 1982.
  • Vaughn, R.B.W. (1871). The Life & Labours of S. Thomas of Aquin (2 vols.). Longmans & Co.
  • Weinryb, I. (2016). The Bronze Objetc in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
  • Złotowski, J.A., Sumioka, H., Nishio, S., Glas, D.F., Bartneck, C. and Ishiguro, H. (2015) Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 883, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00883