Prestaciones sismorresistentes de un edificio sanitario proyectado con la NCSE-02

  1. Pérez Jiménez, Francisco Javier
  2. Morillas Romero, Leandro Moisés
Revista:
Informes de la construcción

ISSN: 0020-0883

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 70

Número: 551

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/IC.16.117 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Informes de la construcción

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

We assess the seismic performance of a hospital building designed following current Spanish codes. The assessment is done with a state-of-the-art probabilistic framework which provides a consistent account for the uncertainties in the evaluation process. A prototype of a health facility serves as a basis to discuss a realistic estimate of the implications of occasional and rare ground motion in essential facilities. To this end, this study comprises nonlinear time history analyses of the building structure, the identification of structural and non-structural performance groups, the probabilistic expression of structural response, and the quantification of damage and repair costs by means of fragility relations. This work reveals that the seismic performance of the analysed facility is inappropriate in terms of damage, loss of functionality and repair costs.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

La guía FEMA E-74 (13) ha aumentado el nivel de conciencia sobre los riesgos no estructurales, las costosas consecuencias de los fallos y las oportunidades para mitigar el daño. Para un edificio típico, con un nivel moderado de sacudida como en España, el papel de los elementos no estructurales es tal que el Apéndice E del FEMA E-74 (13) contempla riesgos entre moderados a altos para la seguridad de la vida, daños en elementos y la pérdida funcional. Para un caso análogo al español, la guía sugiere el refuerzo sísmico para la mayoría de los elementos arquitectónicos, componentes eléctricos, mecánicos, tuberías, conductos, artefactos de iluminación y ascensores. Los muebles, accesorios y equipos también están en riesgo y pueden requerir anclaje y arriostramiento.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (1) NCSE (2002). Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente: Parte General y Edificación. Ministerio de Fomento.
  • (2) Eurocódigo 8 (2012). UNE-EN 1998-3:2012 Proyecto de estructuras sismorresistente. Parte 3: Evaluación y adecuación sísmica de edificios. Asociación Española de Nomalización (AENOR).
  • (3) ASCE 7 (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  • (4) ATC-13 (1985). Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
  • (5) Ho, C., Hadj-Hamou, T., Nilsson, M. (1995, 17 de Octubre). GIS based zonation of infraestructural damage related to seismically triggered landslide risk. En Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Seismic Zonation (pp. 142- 149). Nantes: Ouest Editions.
  • (6) FEMA 577 (2010). Design Guide for Improving Hospital Safety in Earthquakes, Floods, and High Winds. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • (7) Çeleri, M. (1996). Comparison of Northridge earthquake response of a base-isolated and conventional hospital building. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 25. Acapulco. México.
  • (8) Retamales, R., Mosqueda, G., Filiatrault, A., Reinhorn, A. (2011). Testing protocol for experimental seismic qualification of distributed nonstructural systems. Earthquake Spectra, 27(3): 835-856.
  • (9) Whittaker, A.S., Soong, T.T. (2003, 23-24 de Octubre). An overview of nonstructural component research at three U.S. earthquake engineering research centers. En Proceedings of Seminar on Seismic Design, Performance and Retrofit of Nonstructural Components in Critical Facilities. (pp 271-280). Los Ángeles: ATC-29-2.
  • (10) Filiatrault, A., Timothy, S. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building components: The next frontier of earthquake engineering. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 13(1):17-46.
  • (11) FEMA 461 (2007). Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • (12) ICC-ES AC156 (2006). Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Certification by Shake-Table Testing of Nonstructural Components. ICC Evaluation Service.
  • (13) FEMA E-74 (2012). Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • (14) BS ISO 13033:2013 (2013). Bases for design of structures. Loads, forces and other actions. Seismic actions on nonstructural components for building applications. Organización Internacional de Normalización (ISO).
  • (15) BS EN 81-77:2013 (2013). Safety rules for the construction and installations of lifts. Particular applications for passenger and goods passenger lifts. Lifts subject to seismic conditions. British Standards Institution.
  • (16) BS EN 60255-21-1:1996 (1996), IEC 60255-21-1:1988. Electrical relays. Vibration, shock, bump and seismic tests on measuring relays and protection equipment. Vibration tests (sinusoidal). British Standards Institution.
  • (17) BS EN 60255-21-2:1996 (1996), IEC 60255-21-2:1988. Electrical relays. Vibration, shock, bump and seismic tests on measuring relays and protection equipment. Shock and bump tests. British Standards Institution.
  • (18) Maffei, J., Bazzurro, P. (2004). The 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20(S1): S1- S22;.
  • (19) Price, H.J., De Sortis, A., Schotanus, M. (2012). Performance of the San Salvatore Regional Hospital in the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 28(1): 239-256.
  • (20) Masi, A., Santarsiero, M., Gallipoli, M., Mucciarelli, V., Manfredi, A., Dusi, A., Stabile, T.A. (2013) Performance of the health facilities during the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake and analysis of the Mirandola hospital case study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(5):2419-2443.
  • (21) Cosenza, E., Di Sarno, L., Maddaloni, G., Magliulo, G., Petrone, C., Prota, A. (2015). Shake table tests for the seismic fragility evaluation of hospital rooms. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44(1):23-40.
  • (22) Sato, E., Furukawa, S., Kakehi, A., Nakashima, M. (2011). Full-scale shaking table test for examination of safety and functionality of base-isolated medical facilities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2011; 40(13): 1435-
  • (23) Shi, Y., Masahiro, K., Masayoshi, N. (2014). Disorder and damage of base-isolated medical facilities when subjected to near-fault and long-period ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43(11): 1683-1701.
  • (24) Kuo, K.C., Suzuki, Y., Katsuragi, S., Yao, G.C. (2011) Shake table test on clutter levels of typical medicine shelves and contents subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 40(12): 1367-1386.
  • (25) Furukawa, S., Sato, E., Shi, Y., Becker, T., Nakashima, M. (2013). Full-scale shaking table test of a base-isolated medical facility subjected to vertical motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42(13): 1931-1949.
  • (26) Structural Engineers Association of California & Vision 2000 Committee. Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings. California Office of Emergency Services: Sacramento, 1995
  • (27) ASCE/SEI 31-03 (2003). Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  • (28) ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2007). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  • (29) ATC-58-1 (2011). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings - Volume 1 - Methodology. Applied Technology Council. Redwood City, California.
  • (30) Moehle, J., Deierlein, G.G. (2004, 1-6 de Agosto). A framework methodology for performance- based earthquake engineering. En 13th world conference on earthquake engineering: (pp. 3812-3814). Vancouver, Canadá.
  • (31) Abrahamson, N. A. (1992). Non-stationary spectral matching. Seismological research letters, 63(1), 30.
  • (32) Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N. A., Bommer, J. J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E. M. M. A., & Mendis, R. (2006). An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of earthquake engineering, 10(spec01), 67-89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363246906002736.
  • (33) CTE (2006). Código Técnico de la Edificación. Ministerio de Vivienda.
  • (34) EHE-08 (2008). Instrucción del Hormigón Estructural. Secretaría Técnica General. Ministerio de Fomento.
  • (35) CYPE Ingenieros SA (2012). CYPECAD 2012.k [Software]. Disponible en http://descargas.cype.es
  • (36) SeismoSoft (2016) SeismoStruct [Software] A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Disponible en http://www.seismosoft.com.
  • (37) Yao, C., Tu, L.Y. (2012, 1-12 de Marzo). The generation of earthquake damage probability curves for building facilities in Taiwan. En Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo, Japón.
  • (38) ATC-58 (2012). Performance Assessment Calculation Tool. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, California.
  • (39) Benavent-Climent, A., Morillas, L., Escolano-Margarit, D. (2014). Shake-table tests of a reinforced concrete frame designed following modern codes: seismic performance and damage evaluation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43(6):791-810.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet