Perfiles de autoeficacia docente y conocimiento especializado para la enseñanza de las matemáticas

  1. Avilés-Canché, Karen
  2. Marbán Prieto, José María 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado: REIFOP

ISSN: 1575-0965

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Laboratorios de investigación en el aula: principios y modelos educativos basados en la evidencia

Volumen: 26

Número: 2

Páginas: 57-85

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/REIFOP.559321 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado: REIFOP

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Initial teacher training is a decisive process in the purpose of moving towards fully inclusive schools through, in particular, training processes that facilitate the removal of barriers to learning, including those that originate in the teacher him/herself. In this sense, this study focuses on the perceived self-efficacy of primary school teachers in initial training from the perspective of the MTSK model of Mathematics Teacher Specialized Knowledge. Based on affective scales together with two self-efficacy scales designed ad hoc, and duly validated, and through a hierarchical cluster analysis, we proceeded to identify different profiles of teachers in initial training on a sample of 161 first year students of the Degree in Primary Education at the University of Valladolid. The results show three profiles with well-defined characteristics that can be useful as a diagnosis of the situation but, above all, as a starting point for the design of teaching-learning processes that adequately address the three profiles allowing their evolution throughout the initial training towards states that do not pose an obstacle to the full development of the teacher as a professional trained for a full inclusive mathematics education.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alshehri, K. A., & Youssef, N. H. (2022). The influence of mathematical knowledge for teaching towards elementary teachers’ mathematical self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12086
  • Ambussaidi, I,. & Yang, Y. F. (2019). The impact of mathematics teacher quality on student achievement in Oman and Taiwan. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i2.39
  • Asamblea General de la ONU (1948). Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos, 10 diciembre 1948, 217 A (III). Recuperada el 20 de junio de 2022 de https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/47a080e32.html
  • Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., & Dahl, S. (2006). Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 27-46.
  • Avilés-Canché, K. I., & Marbán, J. M. (2022, en preparación). Autoeficacia docente y conocimiento especializado del profesor de matemáticas: diseño y validación de escalas apoyadas en el modelo MTSK.
  • Baka, L. (2017). Norwegian teacher self-efficacy scale psychometric properties of the polish versión of the scale. Medycyna Pracy, 68(6), 743-755. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00569
  • Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14-46.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
  • Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 39(1), 146-170.
  • Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791-807.
  • Carnoy, M., Chisholm, L., & Chilisa, B. (2012). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. HSRC Press.
  • Carrillo, J., Climent., N., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Montes, M. A., Contreras, L. C., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar, A., Ribeiro, M., y Muñoz-Catalán. C. (2018). The mathematics teacher's specialised knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981.
  • Carvalho, N. B., Minim, V. P. R., Nascimento, M., Vidigal, M. C. T. R., Ferreira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, A. C. A., & Minim, L. A. (2015). A discriminant function for validation of the cluster analysis and behavioral prediction of the coffee market. Food Research International, 77, 400-407.
  • Constitución Española. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 29 de diciembre de 1978, núm. 311, pp. 29313 a 29424.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109 – 132.
  • Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Estadística Multivariada (〖2.〗^a ed.). Lavras: Ed. UFLA.
  • Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. Alberta Ministry of Education.
  • Fuente-Fernández, S. (2011). Análisis conglomerados. UAM, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. M. (2003). La tarea intelectual en matemáticas afecto, meta-afecto y los sistemas de creencias. Boletín de la Asociación Matemática Venezolana, 10(2), 225-247.
  • Green, T. (1971). The activities of teaching. McGraw-Hill.
  • Grootenboer, P., & Marshman, M. (2016). Mathematics, Affect and Learning. Middle School Students’ Beliefs and Attitudes About Mathematics Education. Springer.
  • Hernández-Sampieri, R. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill México.
  • Hwang, M. H., Choi, H. C., Lee, A., Culver, J. D., & Hutchison, B. (2016). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement: A 5-year panel analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 89-98.
  • Isnawan, M. G., & Wicaksono, A. B. (2020). Students’ mathematics learning achievement from mathematics teacher performance and principal managerial competencies point of view. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 76-86.
  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 805.
  • Kutaka, T. S., Smith, W. M., Albano, A. D., Edwards, C. P., Ren, L., Beattie, H. L., Lewis, W. J., Heaton, R. M., & Stroup, W. W. (2017). Connecting Teacher Professional Development and Student Mathematics Achievement: A 4-Year Study of an Elementary Mathematics Specialist Program. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116687551
  • Leiva-Valdebenito, S. A., & Torres-Avilés, F. J. (2010). Una revisión de los algoritmos de partición más comunes en el análisis de conglomerados: un estudio comparativo. Revista Colombiana de Estadística, 33(2), 321-339.
  • Ley Orgánica de Educación. (2020). Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Diario oficial Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2020-17264
  • Marbán, J. M., & Mulenga, E. M. (2019). Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 253-263.
  • Marbán, J. M., Palacios, A., & Maroto, A. (2021). Enjoyment of teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 613-629.
  • Matas, A. (2018). Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 20(1), 38-47.
  • McLeod, D. B. (1989). The role of affect in mathematical problem solving. En D. B. MacLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.) Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. Springer.
  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 575-596.
  • Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The Impact of Teacher Self-efficacy on the Students' Motivation and Achievement. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(3).
  • Montes, M.A. (2016). Las creencias en MTSK. En J. Carrillo, L.C. Contreras y M. Montes (Eds.), Reflexionando sobre el conocimiento del profesor. Actas de las II Jornadas del Seminario de Investigación de Didáctica de la Matemática de la Universidad de Huelva (pp. 55-59). SGSE.
  • Muñoz-Catalán, M. C., Contreras, L. C., Carrillo, J., Rojas, N., Montes, M. Á., y Climent, N. (2015). Conocimiento especializado del profesor de matemáticas (MTSK): un modelo analítico para el estudio del conocimiento del profesor de matemáticas. La Gaceta de la Real Sociedad Matemática Española, 18(3), 1801-1817.
  • ONU (2015). Resolución adoptada por la Asamblea General el 25 de septiembre 2015:70/1: Transformando nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. Recuperada el 25 de junio de 2022 de https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ares70d1_es.pdf
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
  • Pillen, M. T., Den Brok, P. J., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Profiles and change in beginning teachers' professional identity tensions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 86-97.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. The Free Press.
  • Segarra, J., Bueno, A., Barrazueta, J., & Juliá, C. (2021). Estudio de la autoeficacia de las enseñanzas de matemáticas de los estudiantes de cuarto año de la Universidad del Azuay y la Universitat Rovira i Virgili. PNA, 16(1), 78-97.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., ... & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological science, 23(7), 691-697.
  • Taylor, N., & Taylor, S. (2013). Teacher knowledge and professional habitus. In N. Taylor, S. van der Berg y T. Mabogoane (Eds.), Creating effective schools (pp. 204-233). Pearson.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  • UNESCO. (2000). World Education Report 2000: The Right to Education. Unesco.
  • Verdugo, M., Asún, R., & Martínez, S. (2017). Validación de la escala de creencias de eficacia en la enseñanza de la matemática (ECEEM) y caracterización de las creencias de estudiantes de pedagogía básica. Calidad en la Educación, (47), 145-178
  • Watson, J. M. (2001). Profiling teachers' competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 305-337.
  • White, A. L., Way, J., Perry, B., & Southwell, B. (2005). Mathematical attitudes, beliefs and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics teacher education and development, 7(33-52).
  • Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Stegall, J., Losinki, M., & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). The construction and initial validation of the student teachers’ efficacy scale for teaching students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516686059
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet