Blood donors wantednarrative innovation on TikTok to enable mobilization

  1. Martínez-Sanz, Raquel 1
  2. Arribas-Urrutia, Amaia 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Any de publicació: 2023

Títol de l'exemplar: Network activisms

Volum: 32

Número: 3

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.MAY.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: El profesional de la información

Resum

The explosive success of TikTok is one of a long list of phenomena that are transforming audiovisual relationships, creation, and consumption (Gómez-García; Vicent-Ibáñez, 2022). At the same time, social networks are demonstrating a capacity for outreach, awareness, and activism through innovative narratives that impact the audience. Therefore, we ask if and how, in addition to entertaining and being a place to find the latest trends, TikTok can help promote health activism linked to blood donation –an act of social responsibility– the collection of which has been in sharp decline for years (Carter et al., 2011; Huis-in ‘t-Veld et al., 2019). Through multimodal discourse analysis (Kress, 2012), we determine the characteristics, significance, and communicative resources of the tiktoks that the platform grouped under the hashtag #donasangre [#DonateBlood], ultimately comparing them with the perception and relationship that a large group of young university students expressed in focus groups. Among the results, we highlight how content on TikTok is reinterpreted and appropriated, as well as the false myths perpetuated among young people that keep them from donating and reinforce the importance of health institutions taking an active role in the online conversation and integrating narrative innovation into their content creation dynamics. Qualitative analysis of comments (6,215) revealed that there is an audience that “comes together” (Juris, 2012) and whose members reaffirm their status as donors and whose experience tempers the idea of donating being stressful and scary.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Arjona-Martín, José-Borja; Méndiz-Noguero, Alfonso; Victoria-Mas, Juan-Salvador (2020). “Virality as a paradigm of digital communication. Review of the concept and update of the theoretical framework”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.07
  • Arribas-Urrutia, Amaia; Islas-Carmona, Octavio; Gutiérrez-Cortés, Fernando (2019). “De prosumidores a observadores: una tendencia emergente en Internet y en los jóvenes ecuatorianos. Resultados del estudio del World Internet Project, Ecuador”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 74, pp. 969-996. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2019-1367
  • Azzimonti, Marina; Fernandes, Marcos (2023). “Social media networks, fake news, and polarization”. European journal of political economy, v. 76, 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102256
  • Bandura, Albert (2004). “Health promotion by social cognitive means”. Health education & behavior, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
  • Bomfim-de-Souza, Mariluce-Karla; Santoro-Domingo, Pablo (2020). “Donación de sangre y medicina transfusional en la prensa española”. Revista española de comunicación en salud, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 9-19. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.4717
  • Burgess, Simon; Rogers, Marg; Jefferies, Diana (2022). “Empathy and narrative: a discussion of contemporary stories from childcare and healthcare”. International electronic journal of elementary education, v. 14, n. 5, pp. 631-646. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.268
  • Campos-Freire, Francisco; Rúas-Araújo, José; López-García, Xosé; Martínez-Fernández, Valentín-Alejandro (2016). “Impacto de las redes sociales en el periodismo”. Profesional de la información, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 449-457. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.15
  • Candón-Mena, José; Benítez-Eyzaguirre, Lucía (2016). Activismo digital y nuevos modos de ciudadanía: una mirada global. Institut de la Comunicació (InCom-UAB). ISBN: 978 84 944171 8 4 https://incom.uab.cat/publicacions/20160000_0000_ebook12.cat.html
  • Carter, Moira C.; Wilson, Jeniffer; Redpath, Gordon S.; Hayes, Paul; Mitchell, Carol (2011). “Donor recruitment in the 21st century: challenges and lessons learned in the first decade”. Transfusion and apheresis science, v. 45, pp. 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2011.06.001
  • Creswell, John W.; Plano-Clark, Vicki L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 978 1 4129279 1 8
  • Dubovi, Ilana; Tabak, Iris (2021). “Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube”. Public understanding of science, v. 30, n. 6, pp. 759-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521990848
  • Duboz, Priscilla; Cunéo, Bernard (2010). “How barriers to blood donation differ between lapsed donors and non-donors in France”. Transfusion medicine, v. 20, pp. 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2010.00998.x
  • Durántez-Stolle, Patricia; Martínez-Sanz, Raquel; Rodríguez-de-Dios, Isabel (2022). “Effects of narrative persuasive frames on Twitter regarding blood donation: pride versus empathy and people versus numbers”. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.15
  • Eser, Bülent; Kurnaz, Fatih; Kaynar, Leilagül; Yay, Mehmet; Sivgn, Serdar; Ünal, Ali; Çetin, Mustafa (2010). “Are university students a favorable target group for blood donation campaigns?”. Turkish journal of hematology, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 275-281. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjh.2010.42
  • France, Janis L.; Kowalsky, Jennifer M.; France, Christopher R.; McGlone, Sarah T.; Himawan, Lina K.; Kessler, Debra A.; Shaz, Beth H. (2014). “Development of common metrics for donation attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention for the blood donation context”. Transfusion, v. 54, pp. 839-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12471
  • Francis, Diane B. (2021). “Twitter is really therapeutic at times: examination of black men’s Twitter conversations following hip-hop artist Kid Cudi’s depression disclosure”. Health communication, v. 36, n. 4, pp. 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1700436
  • Garza-Guzmán, María-Rosalía (2009). “Fuentes genealógicas y teorías esenciales de la comunicación interpersonal”. Razón y palabra, v. 67. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1995/199520725003.pdf
  • Gisondi, Michael A.; Barber, Robert; Faust, Jeremy-Samuel; Raja, Ali; Strehlow, Matthew; Westafer, Lauren; Gottlieb, Matthias (2022). “A deadly infodemic: social media and the power of Covid-19 misinformation”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 24, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.35552
  • Gómez-García, Salvador; Vicent-Ibáñez, Mireya (2022). “¿A qué juega Netflix? La convergencia de contenidos a través de los videojuegos en su estrategia multietapa”. Revista de comunicación, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 115-134. https://doi.org/10.26441/rc21.2-2022-a6
  • Greffin, Klara; Schmidt, Silke; Schönborn, Linda; Muehlan, Holger (2021). “‘Blood for blood’? Personal motives and deterrents for blood donation in the German population”. International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 18, n. 8, 4238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084238
  • Grunig, James E.; Hunt, Tood (2003). Dirección de relaciones públicas. Gestión 2000. ISBN: 84 8088 395 2
  • Gutiérrez-Lozano, Juan-Francisco; Cuartero, Antonio (2020). “El auge de Twitch: nuevas ofertas audiovisuales y cambios del consumo televisivo entre la audiencia juvenil”. Ámbitos. Revista internacional de comunicación, v. 50, pp. 159-175. https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2020.i50.11
  • Hautea, Samantha; Parks, Perry; Takahashi, Bruno; Zeng, Jim (2021). “Showing they care (or don’t): affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok”. Social media + society, v. 7, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344
  • Hootsuite; We are Social (2022). Digital report 2022: el informe sobre las tendencias digitales, redes sociales y mobile. https://bit.ly/3zN5VQK
  • Huis-in’t-Veld, Elisabeth M. J.; De-Kort, Wim L. A. M.; Merz, Eva-María (2019). “Determinants of blood donation willingness in the European Union: a cross-country perspective on perceived transfusion safety, concerns, and incentives”. Transfusion, v. 59, n. 4, pp. 1273-1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15209
  • Hupfer, Maureen E.; Taylor, Daniel W.; Letwin, Jim A. (2005). “Understanding Canadian student motivations and beliefs about giving blood”. Transfusion, v. 45, n. 2, pp. 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03374.x
  • IAB (2022). Estudio de redes sociales 2022 de IAB Spain. https://bit.ly/3T37MI0
  • Igartua, Juan-José; Guerrero-Martín, Iñigo (2022). “Personal migrant stories as persuasive devices: effects of audience-character similarity and narrative voice”. Journal of social and political psychology, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8237
  • Juris, Jeffrey S. (2012). “Reflections on #occupy everywhere: social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation”. American ethnologist, v. 39, n. 2, pp. 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
  • Kalargirou, Aikaterini A.; Beloukas, Apostolos I.; Kosma, Alexandra G.; Nanou, Cristina I.; Saridi, Maria I.; Kriebardis, Anastasios G. (2014). “Attitudes and behaviours of Greeks concerning blood donation: recruitment and retention campaigns should be focused on need rather than altruism”. Blood transfusion, n. 12, pp. 320-329. https://doi.org/10.2450/2014.0203-13
  • Kress, Gunther (2012). “Multimodal discourse analysis”. In: Gee, James-Paul; Handford, Michael (eds.). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, pp. 35-50. Routledge. ISBN: 978 0 3674738 3 9
  • Lemmens, Karin P. H.; Abraham, Charles; Hoekstra, Trynke; Ruiter, Robert A. C.; De-Kort, Wim L. A. M.; Brug, Johannes; Schaalma, Herman P. (2005). “Why don’t young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors”. Transfusion, v. 45, n. 6, pp. 945-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04379.x
  • Mannell, Jenevieve; Ahmad, Lida; Ahmad, Ayesha (2018). “Narrative storytelling as mental health support for women experiencing gender-based violence in Afghanistan”. Social science & medicine, v. 214, pp. 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.011
  • Martínez-Beleño, Carlos-Andrés; Sosa-Gómez, María-Silvina (2016). “Aportaciones y diferencias entre comunicación en salud, comunicación para el desarrollo y para el cambio social”. Revista de comunicación y salud, v. 6, pp. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.35669/revistadecomunicacionysalud.2016.6(1).71-82
  • Martínez-Sanz, Raquel; Buitrago, Álex; Martín-García, Alberto (2023). “Comunicación para la salud a través de TikTok. Estudio de influencers de temática farmacéutica y conexión con su audiencia”. Revista mediterránea de comunicación, v. 14, n. 1. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23435
  • Moreno-Barreneche, Sebastián (2022). “Identidades estetizadas, interacciones mediatizadas: un abordaje de Instagram desde la sociosemiótica”. Comunicación y medios, v. 31, n. 45, pp. 129-141. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2022.64515
  • Navarro-Robles, María; Vázquez-Barrio, Tamara (2020). “El consumo audiovisual de la Generación Z. El predominio del vídeo online sobre la televisión tradicional”. Ámbitos. Revista internacional de comunicación, v. 51, pp. 10-30. https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2020.i50.02
  • Olivares-García, Francisco-José; Méndez-Majuelos, Inés (2020). “Análisis de las principales tendencias aparecidas en TikTok durante el periodo de cuarentena por la Covid-19”. Revista española de comunicación en salud, supl. 1, pp. 243-252. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5422
  • OMS (1986). Carta de Ottawa. Primera conferencia mundial de promoción para la salud. https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2013/Carta-de-ottawa-para-la-apromocion-de-la-salud-1986-SP.pdf
  • OMS (2022). Disponibilidad y seguridad de la sangre. Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blood-safety-and-availability
  • Padilla-Garrido, Nuria; Fernández-Herrera, María-Dolores; Aguado-Correa, Francisco; Rabadán-Martín, Inmaculada (2021). “Motivators, barriers and communication channels for blood donation in relation to students at a university in Spain”. Transfusion and apheresis science, v. 60, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2021.103270
  • Porroche-Escudero, Ana (2017). “Problematizando la desinformación en las campañas de concienciación sobre el cáncer de mama”. Gaceta sanitaria, v. 31, n. 3, pp. 250-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.11.003
  • Rael, Christine T.; Pierre, Dominique; Frye, Victoria; Kessler, Debra; Duffy, Louisa; Malos, Nick; Van-Tieu, Hong (2021). “Evaluating blood donor experiences and barriers/facilitators to blood donation in the United States using YouTube video content”. Transfusion, v. 61, n. 9, pp. 2650-2657. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16568
  • Rodríguez-Cano, César-Augusto (2018). “Los usuarios en su laberinto: burbujas de filtros, cámaras de eco y mediación algorítmica en la opinión pública en línea”. Virtualis: revista de cultura digital, v. 8, n. 16, pp. 57-76. https://www.revistavirtualis.mx/index.php/virtualis/article/view/250/218
  • Rodríguez-Ríos, Antonio; Lázaro-Pernias, Patricia (2022). “Nuevas narrativas en publicidad. El storydoing como modelo de comunicación que favorece la cocreación del relato de marca entre los usuarios de Instagram”. AdComunica, n. 24, pp. 57-80. https://doi.org/10.6035/adcomunica.6554
  • Rojas-Rajs, Soledad; Jarillo-Soto, Edgar (2013). “Comunicación para la salud y estilos de vida saludables: aportes para la reflexión desde la salud colectiva”. Interface. Comunicação, saúde, educação, v. 17, n. 46, pp. 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-32832013000300008
  • Salaverría, Ramón (2021). Entender y combatir la desinformación sobre ciencia y salud. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/60223
  • Seminario-Córdova, Renzo (2021). “Noticias falsas y su impacto en la sociedad en épocas de pandemia”. Social innova sciences, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 6-17. https://socialinnovasciences.org/ojs/index.php/sis/article/view/49
  • Sheldon, Pavica; Newman, Megan (2019). “Instagram and American teens: understanding motives for its use and relationship to excessive reassurance-seeking and interpersonal rejection”. The journal of social media in society, v. 8, n. 1. https://www.thejsms.org/index.php/JSMS/article/view/423/209
  • Sobowale, Kunmi; Hilliard, Heather; Ignaszewski, Martha J.; Chokroverty, Linda (2020). “Real-time communication: creating a path to covid-19 public health activism in adolescents using social media”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 22, n. 12. https://doi.org/10.2196/21886
  • Sola-Morales, Salomé; Zurbano-Berenguer, Belén (2020). “Activismo digital y feminismo: un análisis comparado de cibercampañas contra el acoso callejero en España, Marruecos y Chile”. Comunicación. Revista internacional de comunicación audiovisual, publicidad y estudios culturales, v. 1, n. 18. https://doi.org/10.12795/comunicacion.2020.i18.01
  • Strauck-Franco, María-Antonia; Guillén-Arruda, Claudia-Alexandra (2017). “Twitter como herramienta para la comunicación en salud en el contexto del fomento de la donación de órganos en el Perú”. ZER: Revista de estudios de comunicación, v. 22, n. 42, pp. 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.17841
  • Syrdal, Holly A.; Briggs, Elten (2018). “Engagement with social media content: a qualitative exploration”. Journal of marketing theory and practice, v. 26, n. 1-2, pp. 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2017.1389243
  • Trauth-Taylor, Kathryn (2021). “Innovators must be powerful storytellers”. Research-technology management, v. 64, n. 3, pp. 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1893057
  • Vandenbosch, Laura; Eggermont, Steven (2016). “The interrelated roles of mass media and social media in adolescents’ development of an objectified self-concept: a longitudinal study”. Communication research, v. 43, n. 8, pp. 1116-1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600488
  • Verón, Eliseo (1996). La semiósis social. Fragmentos de una teoría de la discursividad. Gedisa. ISBN: 978 84 743250 2 7
  • Waheed, Usman; Wazeer, Akhlaaq; Saba, Noore; Qasim, Zahida (2020). “Effectiveness of WhatsApp for blood donor mobilization campaigns during Covid‐19 pandemic”. ISBT science series, v. 15, n 4, pp. 378-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/voxs.12572
  • Weidmann, Christian; Derstroff, Marie; Klüter, Harald; Oesterer, Martin; Müller-Steinhardt, Michael (2022). “Motivation, blood donor satisfaction and intention to return during the Covid-19 pandemic”. Vox sanguinis, v. 117, n. 4, pp. 488-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13212
  • Yuan, Shan; Chang, Shelley; Uyeno, Kasie; Almquist, Gay; Wang, Shirong (2016). “Blood donation mobile applications: are donors ready?”. Transfusion, n. 56, v. 3, pp. 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13387
  • Zabala-Cia, Oroitz; Lorenzo-Sola, Francisco; González-Pacanowski, Toni (2022). “Interactividad en redes sociales para crear relaciones de confianza: ayuntamientos de Navarra en tránsito”. Revista de ciencias de la comunicación e información, v. 27, pp. 25-44. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2022.27.e246
  • Zulli, Diana; Zulli, David-James (2020). “Extending the Internet meme: conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform”. New media & society, v. 24, n. 8, pp. 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet