Evaluación final y calificación de los Trabajos Fin de Estudios en la Formación del Profesorado de Educación Físicapercepciones de los estudiantes

  1. Miriam Sonlleva Velasco 1
  2. Suyapa Martínez Scott 1
  3. Asún Dieste, Sonia 2
  4. Víctor Manuel López Pastor 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726,  1988-2041

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 51

Pages: 791-799

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Assessment is one of the most controversial elements throughout the Physical Education Teacher Education and is especially important in the Final Project of Studies, given the peculiarity of the subject in the different degrees. The aim of this study is to know the perceptions of students of Physical Education Teacher Education on the final assessment and grading processes of the Final Project of Studies. For this purpose, a qualitative study has been carried out with a sample of 22 students from 4 Spanish universities identified as "diana-centers", who attended their training in the academic year 2020-2021. The participants are students of the Degree in Primary Education and the Master's Degree in Teacher Education, in both cases of the Physical Education mentions. Using the focus group technique, we tried to know the opinion of the students in relation to the assessment and grading system of the Final Project of Studies. After data collection, a content analysis of the four focus groups was carried out using the "Nvivo" software (Release Version). The results reveal that the assessment of the Final Project of Studies of the Physical Education degrees is mostly summative and finalistic. This assessment model does not help future teachers to develop their assessment literacy or to understand the value of the subject for their professional education.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purpos-es and processes of master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572017
  • Arreman, I., & Erixon, P.O. (2015). The degree project in Swedish early childhood education and care: What is at stake? Education Inquiry, 6(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27779
  • Battaner, E., González, C., & Sánchez, J. L. (2016). El Trabajo Fin de Grado (TFG) en las Universidades Españolas. Análisis y discusión desde las Defensorías. Universitarias. Revista Universidad, Ética y Derechos, 1, 43-79. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rueda.2016.i1.08
  • Calvert, B., & Casey, B. (2004). Supporting and assessing dissertations and practical projects in media studies degrees: towards collaborative learning. Art Design & Communication in Higher Education, 3 (1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.3.1.47/0
  • Colmenero, M.J., Molina, M.D., & Rodríguez, J. (2020). Percepciones del alumnado universitario sobre los trabajos fin de grado (trabajos de fin de carrera). Formación universitaria, 13 (6), 283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000600283
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Feather, D., Anchor, J.R., & Cowton, C.J. (2014). Supervisors’ perceptions of the value of the undergraduate disserta-tion. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.06.002
  • Fernández, C., Fuentes, T., López, V.M., Pascual, C., & Molina, M. (2021). Evaluación Formativa en Trabajos de Fin de Grado: Proyecto de Innovación Docente. Journal of Sport Pedagogy and Research, 7(3), 45-47.
  • Fernández, C., López, V. M., Fuentes, T., & Hortigüela, D. (2023a). Formative and shared-assessment and Final De-gree Projects in Physical Education Pre-service Teacher Education. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 18(55), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i55.1922
  • Fernández, C., López, V. M., Fuentes, T., & Hortigüela, D. (2023b). La evaluación de los Trabajos Fin de Grado en la Formación Inicial del Profesorado de Educación Física: de una evaluación presencial a una evaluación online. Retos, 49, 1018-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.99146
  • Fuentes, B.P., Valenzuela P., & Caniuqueo, A. (2022). Impacto objetivo y percibido del tipo de evaluación sobre el rendimiento académico de estudiantes de Educación Física bajo un modelo curricular por competencias. Retos, 46, 739-744. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.92042
  • Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Morata y Paideia Galiza Fundación.
  • Gallardo, F., Carter, B., López, V. M., Ojeda, R., & Fuentes, T. (2022). Sistemas de evaluación en la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Física. Retos, 43, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.88570
  • Greenbank, P., Penketh, C., Schofield, M., & Turjansky, T. (2008). The undergraduate Dissertation: “most likely you go your way and I’ll go mine”. The International Journal for Quality and Standards, 3(22), 1-24.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N.K. Dezin., & Y. S. Lincoln (ed). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 213-263). Sage Publications.
  • Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Lea, J. (2014). Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. Higher Education Academy.
  • Herrero, D., Manrique, J. C., & López, V. M. (2021). Incidencia de la Formación Inicial y Permanente del Profesora-do en la aplicación de la Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en Educación Física, Retos, 41, 533-543. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.86090
  • Henríquez, L. (2023). Tutorización en la práctica pedagógica en Educación Física, entre la vigilancia y el acompaña-miento: análisis desde las experiencias de los estudiantes practicantes. Retos, 47, 955-961. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.95215
  • Hortigüela, D. González, S., & Hernández, A. (2021) ¿Evaluamos realmente el aprendizaje en educación física? Per-cepción de los profesores en diferentes etapas educativas, Retos, 42, 643-654. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.88686
  • Kleijn, R.A.M. (de), Mainhard, M.T., Meijer, P.C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Master’s thesis supervision: Relations between perceptions of the supervisor–Student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribu-tion to learning and student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.556717
  • Kleijn, R.A. (de), Meijer, P.C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The Relation between Feedback Perceptions and the Supervisor-Student relationship in Master & Thesis Projects, Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860109
  • Kowalczuk, M., Lopes, A., Underwood, J., Daniela, L., & Clipa, O. (2019). Meaningful time for professional growth or a waste of time? A study in five countries on teachers’ experiences within master’s dissertation/thesis work. Teaching Education, 31(4), 459-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2019.1649649
  • Jansson, A., Brun, G., Lundvall, S., Bjärsholm, D., & Norberg, J. (2020). Students´ perceived learning in physical education: variations across students´ gender and migration background in Sweden. Sport, Education and Society, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1878129
  • Lorente, E., & Kirk, D. (2015). Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Journal PE (EJPE), 22(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15590352
  • Mordal, K., & Green, K. (2012). Physical education teacher education in Norway: the perceptions of student teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 806-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.719867
  • Moura, A., Graça, A., MacPhail, A., & Batista, P. (2021) Aligning the principles of assessment for learning to learning in physical education: A review of literature, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(4), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1834528
  • Moura, A., MacPhail, A., Graça, A., & Batista, P. (2022). Providing physical education preservice teachers with op-portunities to interrogate their conceptions and practices of assessment. 2022 European Journal PE (EJPE), 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221129057.
  • Patton. M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Philpot, R. A. (2017). In search of a critical PETE programme. European Journal PE (EJPE), 25(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X17703770
  • Råde, A. (2014). Final thesis models in European teacher education and their orientation towards the academy and the teaching profession. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.858692
  • Råde, A. (2019). Professional formation and the final thesis in European teacher education: a fusion of academic and professional orientation. Education Inquiry, 10(3), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1514910
  • Rekalde, I., Ruiz, P., & Bilbao, B. (2018). Acción tutorial y evaluación formativa en los Trabajos Fin de Grado. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 16(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2018.10185
  • Reyes, C. I., & Díaz, A. (2020). ¿Quiénes deben ser los agentes evaluadores del TFG? Educación XXI, 23(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.2384
  • Rodríguez, J., Molina, Mª. D., & Colmenero, Mª. (2019). La voz de los estudiantes de la titulación de Educación Pri-maria sobre el Trabajo Fin de Grado. Educação e Pesquisa, 45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201945200829
  • Sotos, M.A. (2020). Análisis cualitativo del proceso de tutorización de los Trabajos Fin de Grado. El caso de la Facul-tad de Educación de Albacete. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.61746
  • Styles, I., & Radloff, A. (2001). The synergistic thesis: student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098770020030533
  • Stylianou, M., Enright, E., & Hogan, A. (2016). Learning to be researchers in physical education and sport pedagogy: the perspectives of doctoral students and early career researchers. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 122-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1244665
  • Trigueros, C., Rivera, E., & Rivera, I. (2020) Investigación cualitativa con ayuda de NVivo (Versión Release 1.1). [Materi-al docente]. Granada.
  • Vagle, M. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research. (2th ed.). Routledge.
  • Valderrama, E., Rullán, M., Sánchez, F., Pons, J., Mans, C., Giné, F., Seco, G., Jiménez, L., Peig, E., Carrera, J., Moreno, A., García, J., Pérez, J., Vilanova, R., Cores, F., Renau, J.M., Tejero, J., & Bisbal, J. (2010). La evalua-ción de competencias en los Trabajos Fin de Estudios, IEEE-RITA, 5 (3), 107-114.
  • Valdés, M., & López, J. (2019). Precursores de la satisfacción con el Trabajo de Fin de Grado (TFG) en estudiantes de Psicología de la Universidad de Sevilla. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 17(2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2019.11153
  • Vera, J., & Briones, E. (2015). Perspectiva del alumnado de los procesos de tutorización y evaluación de los trabajos de fin de grado. Cultura y Educación, 27(4),742-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2015.1089391
  • Webster, F., Pepper, D., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Assessing the undergraduate dissertation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025042
Data source: Dialnet