Caracterización del discurso de la comunidad de habla LGTBI. Una aproximación a la lingüística «queer» hispánica.

  1. Navarro-Carrascosa, Carles 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Revista de investigación lingüística (RIL)

ISSN: 1139-1146

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: En torno al tecnolecto geopónico

Issue: 23

Pages: 353-375

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RIL.393531 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de investigación lingüística (RIL)

Abstract

Every subculture forms a particular linguistic community in which, although language is shared with the rest of society, speech varies in certain aspects. This is the case of the LGTBI speaking community, which uses a peculiar lexicon, as well as a characteristic phraseology, special grammatical structures and, in short, very striking pragmatic resources which aim is to mitigate certain statements, intensify some others in certain contexts and build affiliate speech acts to express solidarity. In addition, it plays a very important role in the construction of the identity of the speakers. This paper proposes an approximate pragmalinguistic analysis that serves as an introduction to queer linguistic studies within Hispanicism.

Bibliographic References

  • Abe, Hideko (2010): Queer Japanese: Gender and Sexual Identities thought Linguistic Practices, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Barret, R. (1995): «Supermodels of the world unite! Political economy and the language of performance among African-American drag queens», en L. Leap (ed.), Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Languages, Buffalo (NY), Gordon & Breach, pp. 207-226.
  • Barret, R. (2002): «Is Queer Theory important for sociolinguistic theory?», en K. Campbell-Kibler, R.J. Podesva, S.J. Roberts y A. Wong (eds.), Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Standford, CA: CSLI, pp. 25-43.
  • Bengoechea, Mercedes (2015): Lengua y género, Madrid, Síntesis.
  • Borba, Rodrigo (2015): «Linguística queer: uma perspectiva pós-identitária para os estudios do linguagem», Revista Entrelinhas, vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 91-107.
  • Briz, Antonio y Grupo Val.Es.Co (2002): Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales, Madrid, Arco/Libros.
  • Brontsema, Robin (2004): «A queer Revolution: Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation», Colorado Researchs in Linguistics, vol. 17, Issue 1, Boulder, University of Colorado.
  • Bucholtz, Mary y Hall, Kira (2004): «Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research», Language in Society, 33 (4), pp. 469-515.
  • Butler, Judith (1997): Lenguaje, poder e identidad, Madrid, Síntesis. Butler, Judith (2007): El género en disputa, Madrid, Espasa.
  • Cameron, D. y Kulick, D. (2003): Language and Sexuality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Cameron, D. y Kulick, D. (eds.) (2006): The Language and Sexuality Reader, Londres, Routledge.
  • Campbell-Kibler, K., et al. (2002): Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Standford, CA: CSLI.
  • Cuenca, M.ª Josep (2008): «Usos de hombre/home y mujer/dona como marcadores del discurso en la conversación coloquial», Verba, 35, pp. 235-256.
  • De Lauretis, Teresa (1991): «Queer theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities», Differences:A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3, 2, pp. iii.xviii. Indianápolis, Indiana University Press.
  • Jones, L. (2012): Dyke/Girl: Language and Identities in a Lesbian Group, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Leap, W.L. (2008): «Queering gay men’s English», en K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson y J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Basingtoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.283-296.
  • Leap, W.L. y Boellstorf, T. (eds.)(2004): Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, Urbana, IL,University of Illinois Press.
  • Leap, W.L. y Motschenbacher, T. (eds.)(2012): «Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies», Journal of Language and Sexuality, 1 (1), pp. 1-14.
  • Livia, A. y K. Hall (eds.) (1997): Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Morrish, L. y Sauntson, H. (2007): New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko (2010): Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko (2011): «Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research», International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 212, pp. 149-179.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko (2012): «Queere Linguistik: Theoretische und methodologische Überlengungen zu einer heteronormativitätskritischen Sprachwissenschaft», en S.
  • Günthner, D. Hüpper y C. Spiess (eds.), Genderlinguistik_ Sprachliche Konstruktionen von Geschlechtsidentität, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 87-125. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 212, pp. 149-179.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko (2013): «Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia», Critical Discourse Studies, 10, pp. 49-70.
  • Motschenbacher, Heiko y Stegu, Martin (2013): «Queer Linguistics approaches to discourse», Discourse and Society, 24 (5), pp. 519-535.
  • Navarro-Carrascosa, Carles (2019): «Resignificación y reapropiación en el español coloquial: el caso de maricón». En Cabedo Nebot, Adrián e Hidalgo Navarro, Antonio (eds.), Pragmática del español hablado. Hacia nuevos horizontes. València: Universitat de València, pp. 169-183.
  • Pereda, Ferran (2004): El cancaneo. Diccionario petardo de argot gay, lesbi y trans, Barcelona, Laertes.
  • Portolés, José (1998): Los marcadores del discurso, Barcelona, Ariel. Rodríguez, Félix (2008): Diccionario gay-lésbico, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Sáez, Javier (2004): Teoría queer y psicoanálisis, Madrid, Síntesis.
  • Sauntson, H. (2008): «The contributions of Queer Theory to gender and language research», en K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson y J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 271-282.
Data source: Dialnet