La (jurídica) igualdad de trato (de origen norteamericano) y la (política) igualdad de oportunidades (de origen europeo)conexiones, confusiones y malentendidos

  1. Fernando Rey Martínez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Zeitschrift:
IgualdadES

ISSN: 2695-6403

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Jahr: 5

Nummer: 9

Seiten: 13-43

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: IgualdadES

Zusammenfassung

The Bill 15/2022 for equal treatment is a paradoxical regulation. On the one hand, it refers to equal treatment, a North American approach in origin that is received in Spain through the European Union. On the other hand, it contains numerous equal opportunity measures or positive actions, although not too many are original or especially interesting. In a context in which two concepts of constitutional equality can be distinguished, the American one, of a legal nature, and the European one, of a rather political and principal nature, the Law does not clearly opt for either of them. In addition, the option of the legislator for a new, autonomous Authority, fits within the European framework, but it seems wrong to me, as well as the referral to third parties of the sanctioning power.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Agencia Europea de Derechos Fundamentales y Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. (2018). Manual de legislación europea contra la discriminación. Luxemburgo: Agencia Europea de Derechos Fundamentales y Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos.
  • Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S. y West, M. (2013). Promoting equity in education. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 11, 32-48.
  • Bamforth, N., Malik, M. y O’Cinneide, C. (2008). Discrimination Law: Theory and Context. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
  • Connolly, M. (2011). Discrimination Law. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
  • Ely, J. H. (1977). Equal Citizenship under the XIV Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 91, 69-96.
  • Fiss, O. (1976). Groups and the Equal Protection Clause. Philosophical and Public Affairs, 5 (107), 53-80.
  • Fraser, N. y Honneth, A. (2006). ¿Redistribución o Reconocimiento? Madrid: Morata y Fundación Paideia Galiza.
  • Hepple, B. (2014). Equality. The legal framework. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Joubert, J. (2009). Pensamientos. Barcelona: Península.
  • Karst, K. L. (1977). Equal Citizenship under the Fourtheenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 91, 1-68. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340515.
  • Rey, F. (2021). El organismo español para la igualdad: claves para su convergencia con el modelo europeo. Revista Galega de Administración Pública, 61, 311-342.
  • Rey, F. (2023). Derecho antidiscriminatorio. Pamplona: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
  • Tussman, J. y Tenbroek, J. (1949). The equal protection of the laws. California Law Review, 3, 341-381. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/3477801.
  • Xenidis, R. y Masse-Dessem, H. (2018). Positive action in practice in the field of EU gender equality law. European Equality Law Review, 2, 36-62. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yey005.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet