Las definiciones estéticas de arte y sus supuestos

  1. Castro, Sixto 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Ideas y valores: Revista Colombiana de Filosofía

ISSN: 0120-0062

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 72

Número: 183

Páginas: 51-71

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15446/IDEASYVALORES.V73N184.94752 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ideas y valores: Revista Colombiana de Filosofía

Resumen

En este texto se presenta una lectura crítica de las definiciones de arte que lo vinculan de modo necesario con las propiedades estéticas. Se analizan los elementos centrales de los que dependen estas definiciones y se muestra su carácter problemático. Asimismo, se hace patente su vinculación con algunos intentos de ofrecer un enfoque intercultural y universalista de las artes y se concluye que, si bien las propiedades estéticas tienen una gran importancia en la teorización sobre las artes, es necesario tomarlas no tanto como elementos esenciales cuanto como propiedades en sentido aristotélico.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, James. “Aesthetic Concepts of Art.” Theories of Art Today. Edited by Noël Carroll. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2000. 65-92.
  • Bach, Johann Sebastian, Sämtliche Orgelwerke. Band 7: Orgelbüchlein, 18 grosse Choralarbeitungen. Wiesbaden: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1991.
  • Beardsley, Monroe C. “An Aesthetic Definition of Art.” Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. The Analytic Tradition. An Anthology. Edited by Peter Lamarque and Stein Haugom Wiley Blackwell. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2019. 22-29.
  • Beardsley, Monroe. C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1958.
  • Beardsley, Monroe C. “The Aesthetic Point of View.” Metaphilosophy, 1.1 (1970): 39-58. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1970.tb00784.x]
  • Bullough, Edward. “Psychical Distance as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle.” British Journal of Psychology, 5 (1912): 87-117. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1912.tb00057.x]
  • Carroll, Noël. “Art and the Domain of Aesthetic.” British Journal of Aesthetics, 40.2 (2000): 191-208. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.2.191]
  • Carroll, Nöel. “Beauty and the Genealogy of Art Theory.” Beyond Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001a. 20-41. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605970.004]
  • Carroll, Nöel. “Enjoyment, Indifference and Aesthetic Experience: comments for Robert Stecker.” British Journal of Aesthetics, 41.1 (2001b): 81-83. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.1.81]
  • Carroll, Nöel. “Four Concepts of Aesthetic Experience.” Beyond Aesthetics. Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001c. 41-62. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605970.005]
  • Carroll, Nöel. “Aesthetic Experience Revisited”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 42.2 (2002): 145-168. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.2.145]
  • Castro, Sixto J. Vituperio de orbanejas. México: Herder, 2005.
  • Castro, Sixto J. “El arte ya (no) es bello.” Sociedades en crisis, perspectivas estéticas para Europa. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, 2011. 136-145.
  • Castro, Sixto J., “¿Qué significa apreciar la ‘naturaleza’ como naturaleza?”. Revista de Filosofía, 40.2 (2015):127-141. [https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RESF.2015.v40.n2.50059]
  • Castro, Sixto J. Filosofía del arte. El arte pensado. México: Herder, 2017.
  • Danto, Arthur C. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • Danto, Arthur C. La transfiguración del lugar común. Traducido por Ángel Molla y Aurora Molla. Barcelona: Paidós, 2002.
  • Danto, Arthur C. Más allá de la Caja Brillo. Las artes visuales en perspectiva post-histórica. Traducido por Alfredo Brotons. Madrid: Akal, 2003.
  • Danto, Arthur C., Después del fin del arte. El arte contemporáneo y el linde de la historia. Traducido por Elena Neerman. Barcelona: Paidós, 2010.
  • Danto, Arthur C. El abuso de la belleza. Traducido por Carles Roche. Barcelona: Paidós, 2011.
  • Davies, Stephen. “Non-Western Art and Art’s Definition.” Theories of Art Today. Edited by Noël Carroll. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2000. 199-216.
  • Dhillon, Pradeep A. “A Kantian Approach to Writing a Global Art History.” The Many Faces of Beauty. Edited by Vittorio Hösle. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013. 302-326.
  • Dickie, George. “The Myth of Aesthetic Attitude”. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1964): 56-65.
  • Dickie, George. “Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience.” Journal of Philosophy, 62 (1965): 129-136. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2023490]
  • Dickie, George. “Physical Distance: In a Fog at Sea.” British Journal of Aesthetics, 13 (1973): 17-29. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/13.1.17]
  • Dickie, George. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1974.
  • Dickie, George. El círculo del arte. Una teoría del arte. Traducido por Sixto J. Castro. Barcelona: Paidós, 2005.
  • Dickie, George. “Altamira y la invención de la representación visual.” Estudios Filosóficos, 161 (2007): 5-16.
  • Dutton, Denis. “Tribal Art and Artifact.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51 (1993): 13-21. [https://doi.org/10.2307/431966]
  • Dutton, Denis. “Art, Behavior and the Anthropologists.” Current Anthropology, 18 (1997): 387-394. [https://doi.org/10.1086/201921]
  • Dutton, D. El instinto del arte. Belleza, placer y evolución humana. Traducido por Carme Font. Barcelona: Paidós, 2010.
  • Eaton, Marcia. M. “A Sustainable Definition of Art.” Theories of Art Today. Edited by Noël Carroll. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2000. 141-159.
  • Friday, Jonathan. Aesthetics and Photography. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.
  • Ground, Ian. ¿Arte o chorrada? Traducido por Salvador Rubio. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, 2008.
  • Iseminger, Gary. “The Aesthetic State of Mind.” Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Edited by M. Kieran. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. 98-112.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Crítica del juicio. Traducido por Manuel García Morente. Madrid: Espasa, 1995.
  • Kristeller, Paul O. “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics Part I”. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12. 4 (1951): 496-527. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2707484]
  • Kristeller, Paul O. “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics (II).” Journal of the History of Ideas, 13.1 (1952): 17-46. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2707724]
  • Lamarque, Peter. “Aesthetic Essentialism.” Aesthetic concepts: Essays after Sibley. Edited by E. Brady and J. Levinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. 100-122.
  • Lessing, Gotthold E., Laocoonte. Traducido por Sixto J. Castro. México: Herder, 2014.
  • Lind, Richard. “The Aesthetic Essence of Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50 (1992): 117-129. [https://doi.org/10.2307/430951] .
  • Margolis, Joseph. “Works of Art as Physically Embodied and Culturally Emergent Entities.” British Journal of Aesthetics, 14. 3 (1974): 187-196. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/14.3.187]
  • Margolis, Joseph. On Aesthetics. An Unforgiving introduction.Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth, 2009.
  • Matravers, Derek. “The Aesthetic Experience.” The Continuum Companion to Aesthetics. Edited by Anna C. Ribeiro. London-New York: Continuum, 2012.
  • Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Beyond Speculation. Art and Speculation without Myths. Translate by Dafydd Roberts. Chicago: Seagull Book, 2015.
  • Scharfstein, Ben Ami. Art without Borders. A Philosophical Exploration of Art and Humanity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009. [https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226736112.001.0001]
  • Schlesinger, George. “Aesthetic Experience and the Definition of Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (1979): 167-176. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/19.2.167]
  • Scruton, Roger. Beauty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. [https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199229758.001.0001]
  • Sibley, Frank. “Aesthetic Concepts.” Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 1-23. [https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238991.003.0001]
  • Tomás de Aquino, In librum beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositio. Turín: Marietti, 1950. [https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/cdn04.html]
  • Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art.” The Philosophical Review, 79.3 (1970): 334-376. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2183933]
  • Walton, Kendall. “How Marvelous! Toward a Theory of Aesthetic Value.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art criticism, 51 (1993): 499-510. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac51.3.0499]
  • Wollheim, Richard. El arte y sus objetos. Traducido por Carlos Trías. Barcelona: Seix Barral, 1972.
  • Zangwill, Nick. “The Creative Theory of Art.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 32 (1995): 307-323.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet