El obstruccionismo climático en redes socialesdesinformación y ataques contra las voces de la ciencia

Referencias bibliográficas

• A.P. (21 de abril de 2023). La AEMET pide "respeto" tras enfrentarse a una turba de conspiracionistas: "Nos estáis fumigando". El Periódico de España. https://www.epe.es/es/actualidad/20230421/aemet-conspiracion-clima-86310221
• Abbar, S., Zanouda, T., Berti‐Equille, L. y Borge‐Holthoefer, J. (2016). Using Twitter to understand public interest in climate change: The case of Qatar. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04010
• Abellán López, M. Á. (2021). El cambio climático: negacionismo, escepticismo y desinformación. Tabula Rasa, 37, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n37.13.
• Anderson, A.A., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Corley, E.A. (2012). The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
• Andrino, B., Pérez, J. y Rodríguez, R. (12 diciembre, 2019). Histérica, marioneta y majareta: los insultos que hombres dedican a Greta Thunberg en Twitter. El País. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2019/12/12/actualidad/1576106658_165755.html
• Arce García, S., Díaz Campo, J., y Cambronero Saiz, B. (2023). Online hate speech and emotions on Twitter: a case study of Greta Thunberg at the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in 2019. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01052-5
• Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G. y Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one, 10(2). https://doi.org/e0118093
• Boykoff, M. T. (2009). El caso del cambio climático: los medios y la comunicación científica. Infoamérica: Iberoamerican Communication Review, 1, 117-127.
• Capstick, S.B. & Pidgeon, N.F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012
• Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P. & Yang, D. (2022). How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Advance online publication, 28(2), 384-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. & Ecker, U.K. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PloS one, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
• Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S. & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
• Darius, P. y Stephany, F. (2019). “Hashjacking” the Debate: Polarisation Strategies of Germany’s Political Far-Right on Twitter. En Social Informatics: 11th International Conference, Doha, Qatar, November 18–21, 2019, Proceedings 11 (pp. 298-308). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21
• Di Placido, D. (29 de diciembre de 2022). Esta es la respuesta viral de Greta Thunberg al ataque de Andrew Tate en Twitter. Forbes. https://forbes.es/actualidad/213906/esta-es-la-respuesta-viral-de-greta-thunberg-al-ataque-de-andrew-tate-en-twitter/
• Dias, N. and Sippitt, A. (2020), Researching Fact Checking: Present Limitations and Future Opportunities. Political Quarterly, 91(3), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12892
• Diethelm, P. and McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientist respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ ckn139
• Ekberg, K., Forchtner, B., Hultman, M. y Jylhä, K.M. (2022). Climate Obstruction: How Denial, Delay and Inaction Are Heating the Planet. Routledge.
• Elgesem D., Steskal L. y Diakopoulos N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
• Frances Bloomfield, E. y Tillery, D. (2019). The Circulation of Climate Change Denial Online: Rhetorical and Networking Strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378
• Gandolfo, V. J. (2017). Falta de derechos humanos y violencia: La crisis ambiental en América Latina [Tesis de grado]. Universidad Trinity College
• García Avilés, J.A., Navarro Maillo, F. y Arias Robles, F. (2014). La credibilidad de los contenidos informativos en internet para los nativos digitales: estudio de caso. Palabra clave, 17(3), 875-894. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.13
• García Jiménez, A., Tur Viñes, V. y Pastor Ruiz, Y. (2018). Consumo mediático de adolescentes y jóvenes. Noticias, contenidos audiovisuales y medición de audiencias. Icono 14, 16(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1101
• García Hernández, J., y López Gallegos, M. (2018). Mujeres mártires ambientales en América Latina. Una visibilización de los ecofeminicidios por la defensa del territorio en México. HistoriAgenda, 3(33), 21–33
• Hameleers, M. (2020). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media—Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14, 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12463
• Hameleers, M. y van der Meer, T. (2020). Misinformation and Polarization in a High-Choice Media Environment: How Effective Are Political Fact-Checkers? Communication Research, 47(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671
• Harvey, J.A., Van den Berg, D., Ellers, J., Kampen, R., Crowther, T.W., Roessingh, P., Verheggen, B., Nuijten, R., Post, E., Lewandowsky, S., Stirling, I., Balgopal, M., Amstrup, S.C. y Mann, M.E. (2018). Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate-Change Denial by Proxy. BioScience, 68(4), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix133
• Heras, F. (2013). La negación del cambio climático en España: percepciones sociales y nuevos tratamientos mediáticos. En R. Mancinas Chávez (coord.) y R. Fernández Reyes (dir.) Medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 155-170). Facultad de Comunicación de la Universidad de Sevilla.
• Heras, F. (2018). Respuestas ante el negacionismo climático de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global. Revista PAPELES, 140, 119-130.
• Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D, y Logan, D. (2012). Share, Like, Recommend. Decoding the Social Media News Consumer. Journalism Studies, 13 (5-6): 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
• Herrero, E. & Herrero Damas, S. (2021). El fact-checker en español alrededor del mundo: Perfil, similitudes y diferencias entre verificadores hispanohablantes. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 54, 49–77, https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e725
• Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison Wesley
• Howell, E.L., Wirz, C.D., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Xenos, M.A. (2020). Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism’. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 800–818, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0963662520962741
• IPCC (2022). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycl
• Jang, S. M., y Hart P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
• Kirilenko, A. P. y Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
• Lamb, W.F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J.T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J.C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., y Steinberger, J.K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
• Lampis, A. (2013). La adaptación al cambio climático: el reto de las dobles agendas. En J.C. Postigo (ed.) Cambio climático, movimientos sociales y políticas públicas: una vinculación necesaria. Clacso.
• León, B. y Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating Science and Technology through Online Video. Routledge
• León, B. y Erviti, M.C. (2013). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183–199, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196
• Martín Sánchez, A. (2020). Respuestas a la crisis climática: negacionismo populista y nacionalismo verde. Ecología Política, 59, 24-28. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ descarga/articulo/7528856.pdf
• Martín Sosa, S. (2021). Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos. Communication & Methods, 3(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.35951/v3i1.111
• McKie, R., Holder, F., Sanober, M., Carbone, J. & Ngo-Lee N. (2022). Climate Obstruction and Facebook Advertising: How a Sample of Climate Obstruction Organizations Use social media to Disseminate Discourses of Delay. Climatic Change, 176, 16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1760493/
• Meyer, H., Peach, A.K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H.E. y Brüggemann, M. (2023). Between Calls for Action and Narratives of Denial: Climate Change Attention Structures on Twitter. Media and Communication 11, (1), 278–292. https://doi.org/ 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111
• Mohan, L. (25 de Agosto de 2021). Perspective: Tackling misinformation on YouTube. Inside YouTube. https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/tackling-misinfo/
• Molina Cañabate, J.P. y Magallón Rosa, R. (2020). Desinformación y periodismo científico: el caso de Maldita Ciencia. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 11(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4 10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4
• Moreno Olmeda, T. (2022). Del negacionismo climático al obstruccionismo: el argumentario de la inacción y su amplificación en YouTube. Dilemata, 38, 119-134. https://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/412000489
• Nguyen, A. & Catalan, D. (2020). Digital mis/disinformation and public engagment with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from Covid-19. Media and Communication, 8(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
• Norgaard, K.M. (2006). “People want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3): 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00160.x
• Painter, J., Erviti, M.C., Fletcher, R., Howarth, C., Kristiansen, S., León, B., Ouakrat, A., Russell, A. y Schäfer, M.S. (2016). Something old, something new: digital media and the coverage of climate change. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F.G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quiantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Rodrigo Cano, D. y Del Río Álvarez, M. J. (2021). La desinformación sobre salud y cambio climático en redes sociales. En J.C. Figuereo-Benítez y R. Mancinas-Chávez (coords.) Las redes de la comunicación: estudios multidisciplinares actuales (pp. 833-846). Dykinson.
• Schäfer, M.S. (2015). Climate change and the media. En J.D. Wright (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 853-859). Elsevier
• Shapiro, M.A. y Park, H.W. (2015). More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Social Science Information, 54(1), 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018414554730
• Siwakoti, S., Yadav, K., Bariletto, N., Zanotti, L., Erdogdu, U. & Shapiro, J.N. (2021). How COVID drove the evolution of fact-checking. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-69
• Stencel, M., Ryan, E. & Luther, J. (21 de junio de 2023), Misinformation spreads, but fact-checking has leveled off. Duke Reporters’ Lab. https://reporterslab.org/ misinformation-spreads-but-fact-checking-has-leveled-off/
• Tran, D. y Hanaček, K. (2023). A global analysis of violence against women defenders in environmental conflicts. Nature sustainability, 6, 1045-1053. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41893-023-01126-4
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. y Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
• Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods, applied social research methods series. Sage