Cómo responder a entornos turbulentosopciones y efectos de la capacidad dinámica de desarrollo de nuevos productos

  1. Ortega Álvarez, Ana
  2. García Merino, María Teresa
  3. Santos Álvarez, María del Valle
Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2013

Título del ejemplar: PYME y emprendimiento innovador

Número: 388

Páginas: 103-110

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

Partiendo de la consideración del desarrollo de nuevos productos como capacidad dinámica, el presente trabajo identifica las diversas opciones que dicho proceso puede presentar y analiza sus posibles efectos, integrando aportaciones dispersas y a veces contradictorias, observadas en la literatura reciente. Como principales conclusiones, se recomienda a las empresas y, en particular a las Pymes, que, considerando el proceso de desarrollo de nuevos productos como vía de aprendizaje y renovación para enfrentarse a entornos dinámicos, seleccionen la opción más apropiada a las condiciones del entorno. En último término se destacan los beneficios de combinar nuevo conocimiento con aquello que ya se conoce y posee.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANDRIOPOULOS, C. y LEWIS, M.W. (2009): Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20 (4), pp. 696-717.
  • ATUAHENE-GIMA, K. y MURRAY, J. (2007): Exploratory and exploi- tative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of Internatio nal Marketing, 15 (2), pp. 1-29.
  • BARRETO, I. (2010): Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, vol. 36 (1), pp. 256-280.
  • BROWN, S.L. Y EISENHARDT, K. (1995): Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, vol. 20 (2), pp. 343-378.
  • CALANTONE, R.; GARCIA, R. y DRÖGE, C. (2003): The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, nº 20, pp. 90-103.
  • COLLIS, D.J. (1994): How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, nº 15 (Winter Special Issue), pp. 143-152.
  • DANNEELS, E. (2008): Organizational antecedents of secondorder competences. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29 (5), pp. 519-543.
  • DANNEELS, E. (2002): The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, nº 12, pp. 1095-1121.
  • DANNEELS, E. y KLEINSCHMIDT, E.J. (2001): Product innovativeness from the firm´s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product In novation Management, vol. 18 (6), pp. 357-373.
  • DOUGHERTY, D. (1992): A practice centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, nº 13, pp. 77-92.
  • EISENHARDT, K.M. y MARTIN, J.A. (2000): Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic management Journal, October November Special Issue 21, pp. 1105-1121.
  • ELLONEN, H.K, WIKSTRÖM, P. y JANTUNEN, A. (2009): Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes. Tech novation, nº 29, pp. 753-762.
  • GARCIA, R. y CALANTONE, R. (2002): A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 19 (2), pp. 110-132.
  • GUPTA, A.K; SMITH, K.G. y SHALLEY, C.E. (2006): The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49 (4), pp. 693-706.
  • HAMEL, G. y PRAHALAD, C.K. (1994): Competing for the future. Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
  • HELFAT, C.E. y PETERAF, M.A. (2003): The dynamic resourcebased view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, October Special Issue 24, pp. 997-1010.
  • HELFAT, C.E. y WINTER, S.G. (2011): Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, nº 32, pp. 1243-1250.
  • HELFAT, C.E., FINKELSTEIN, S., MITCHELL, W., PETERAF, M., SINGH, H., TEECE, D. y WINTER, S.G. (2007): Dynamic capabilities: Un derstanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • HOLMQVIST, M. (2004): Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, vol. 15 (1), pp. 70-81.
  • KAHNEMAN D. y TVERSKY, A. (1979): Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, nº 47, pp. 263-291.
  • KATILA, R. y AHUJA, G. (2002): Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45 (6), pp. 1183-1194.
  • KIM, N. y ATUAHENE-GIMA, K. (2010): Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, nº 27, pp. 519-536.
  • LAVIE, D. (2006): Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, vol. 31 (1), pp. 153-174.
  • LEONARDBARTON, D. (1992): Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, nº 13, pp. 111-125.
  • LEVINTHAL, D.A. y MARCH, J.G. (1993): The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14, pp. 95- 112.
  • MAKADOK, R. (2001): Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22 (5), pp.387-401.
  • MARCH, J.G. (1991): Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, vol. 2 (1), pp. 71-87.
  • MOLINA F. J., JIMENEZ, D. y MUNUERA, J.L. (2011): Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, nº 40, pp. 1172-1182.
  • NERKAR, A. (2003): Old Is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, vol. 49 (2), pp. 211-29.
  • PENROSE, E.T. (1959): The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
  • PERKS, H. (2004): Exploring processes of resource exchange and co-creation in strategic partnering for new product development. International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 8 (1), pp. 37-61.
  • PRIEM, R.L. y BUTLER, J.E. (2001): Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?’ Academy of Management Review, vol. 26 (1), pp. 22-40.
  • STAW, B. M., SANDELANDS, L. E. y DUTTON, J. E. (1981): Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 26, pp. 501-524.
  • TEECE, D.J. (2007): Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28 (13), pp. 1319-1350.
  • TEECE, D.J., PISANO, G. y SHUEN, A. (1997): Dynamic Ca pabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18 (7), pp. 509-533.
  • THOMAS, L. y WEIGELT, K. (2000): Product location choice and firm capabilities: Evidence from the US automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, nº 21, pp. 897-909.
  • UOTILA, J., MAULA, M., KEIL, T y ZAHRA, S.A. (2009): Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30 (2), pp. 221-231.
  • VOSS, G.B., SIRDESHMUKH, D. y VOSS, Z.G. (2008): The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 51 (1), pp.147-164.
  • WEZEL, F.C. y VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, A. (2006): From Scooters to Choppers: Product portfolio change and organizational failure. Evidence in the UK Motorcycle Industry 1895 to 1993. Long Range Planning, nº 2, pp. 1-18.
  • WINTER, S.G. (2003): Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, October Special Issue 24, pp. 991- 995.
  • YANG, T.T. y Li, C.R. (2011): Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: The moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness. Management Decision, vol. 49 (9), pp. 1444-1470.
  • YANG Y., WANG, Q., ZHU, H. y WU, G. (2012): What are the effective strategic orientations for new product success under different environments? An empirical study of chinese businesses. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 29 (2), pp.166-179.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., SAPIENZA, H.J. y DAVIDSSON, P. (2006): Entre preneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43 (4), pp. 917- 955.
  • ZOLLO, M. y WINTER, S.G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, vol. 13, (3), pp. 339-351.
  • ZOTT, C. (2003): Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2), pp. 97-125.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet