Análisis de la Elección de Itinerarios Educativos en los Universitarios Españoles. El Caso del Campus de Palencia de la Universidad de Valladolid

Referencias bibliográficas

• Referencias bibliográficas
• Barnes, B. (1988) The Nature of power. Cambridge: Polity.
• Beck, U. (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
• Beijaard, D. Meijier, P.C. y Verloop. N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107 – 128.
• Carnevale, A.P y Ban Cheach. (2013). Hard Times. Colleges Majors, Unemploymenty and Earnings. Washington DC: Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
• Chace, J. F. (2014). Collaborative Projects Increase Student Learning Outcome performance in Nonmajors Environmental Science Course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43, 58-63.
• Chinn, C.A, y. Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
• Coll, R. K y Earnes. C. (2008). Developing and understanding of Higer education science and enginnering learning communities. Research in Science and Technological education, 26(3), 245-257.
• Dickson, L. (2010). “Race and Gender Differences in College Major Choice”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 627: 108-124
• Duncan, L.L. Duncan, B. R. Burkhardt, B. L.. Benneyworth, L. M. y Tasich, C. M. (2015). Getting the Most Out of Dual-Listed Courses: Involving Undergraduate Students in Discussion Through Active Learning Techniques. Journal College Science Teaching, 45(1), 24-31.
• ENCIENDE. (2011). Informe: Enseñanza de las Ciencias en la Didáctica escolar para edades tempranas en España. Madrid: COSCE.
• Fensham, P.J. (1988). Developmentand dilemas in science education. London: Folder Press.
• Fensham, P.J. (2002). Time to Change Drivers for Scientific Literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24.
• Freeman, S. Eddya, S. McDonougha, M. Smithb, M. Okoroafora, N. Jordta, H. y Wenderotha, P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS,111, 8410-8415.
• Fleer, M. (2013). Affective imagination in science education: determining the emotional nature of scientific and technological learning of young children. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2085-2106.
• García-Carmona, A. Criado, A. M. y Cañal, P. (2014). ¿Qué educación científica se promueve para la etapa de Primaria en España? Un análisis de las prescripciones sociales del currículo vigente. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(1), 139-157.
• Geppert, L. (1995). Educating the renaissance engineer. IEEE Spectrum, 32(9), 39–43.
• Gil, D. y Vilches, A. (2006). Educación ciudadana y alfabetización científica: mitos y realidades. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 42, 31-53.
• Goyette, K.A y Mullen, A. (2006). “Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choise and Consequences of Undergraduate Field of Study”. The Journal of Higher Education. 77:497-538.
• Harlow, D. B. (2012). The excitement and wonder of teaching science: What preservice teachers learn from facilitating family science night centers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2),199 – 220.
• Jackson, P. y Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 826 – 857.
• Johnson Cartright, T. (2012). Science talk: Preservice teachers facilitating science learning in diverse after school environments. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 384 – 391.
• Jones, M.G. y Edmonds. J. (2013). Models of elementary Science. Instructions role of science Specialist teachers. En K. Appleton (Ed.) Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Lindahl. R. (2008). “Shared Leadership: Can It Work in Schools?” in The Educational Forum. 72, (4): 298-307. dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720802361894
• Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822 – 839.
• Lloyd. G.M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. Mathematics Education, 41, 763–775
• Mastropieri, M. A. Scruggs, T.E. Boon, R. y Carter. K.B. (2001). Correlates of inquiry learning in science: Constructing concepts of density and buoyancy. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 130–138.
• National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
• McNeill, K. L. y Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. En M. Lovett, y Shah, P (Eds.) Thinking with data. New York: Taylor y Francis.
• Pearson, Ch. (2009). Writing games. Cultural case studies of Academic Literary practices in High Education. New Jersey: Taylor y Francis.
• Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G. Daley, S.G. Scott, S. Robinson, K. H. y Johnson, M. (2013). Universal design for learning and elementary school science: Exploring the efficacy, use, and perceptions of a web-based science notebook. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1210- 1225.
• Rebelo, D., Marques, L., & Costa, N. (2011). Actividades en ambientes exteriores al aula en la Educación en Ciencias: contribuciones para suoperatividad. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 19(1), 15-25.
• Rose, D. H. y Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in Universal Design for Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
• Rossi Cordero, A. y Barajas Frutos, M. (2015). Elección de estudios CTIM y desequilibrios de género. En Enseñanza de las ciencias, 33.3: 59-76.
• Sáinz, M. y Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of Computer and Math Ability: Gender Implications across Time and within ICT Studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80 (2), pp. 486-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005.
• Sjøberg, S. (2004). Science Education: The voice of the learners. Contribution to the Conference on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. Bruselas: Unión Europea. En http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/conferences/2004/sciprof/pdf/sjoberg.pdf
• Sjøberg. S. y Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE Project. An overview and key findings [Online]. Consultado el 17 de noviembre de 2016. Disponoble en: http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
• Spektor-L. O. Kesner Baruch, Y. y Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and Scientific Curiosity in Pre-School. The Teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35 (13), 2226-2253.
• Splitt, F. G. (2002). Environmentally smart engineering education: A brief on a paradigm in progress. Journal of Engineering Education, 91: 447–450.
• Valero Matas, J.A. (2006). Responsabilidad social de la actividad científica. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 64(43), 219-242.
• Varela, M. House, R. y Wenzel. S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89(3), 492 – 516.
• Vázquez–Alonso, Á. y Manassero–Mas, M.A. (2008). El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: un indicador inquietante para la educación cientiífica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 5(3), 274-292
• Wallace. C. y Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to Teach Elementary Science in an Experiential,
• Informal Context: Culture, Learning, and Identity. Science Education, 99(1), 174–198.
• Wallace, C. S. y Eick. C. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers in service learning settings: Developing ideas about teaching, learning and science identity. The Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis: IN
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.