Análisis teórico de un posible futuro en la sociedad ciborgrobotización, estrés y epigenética

  1. Juan Coca 2
  2. Isabel Castro Piedras 3
  3. Jesús Alberto Valero-Matas 2
  4. Rui Pedro Lopes 1
  1. 1 Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
    info
    Instituto Politécnico de Bragança

    Bragança, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/00prsav78

    Geographic location of the organization Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info
    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de Valladolid
  3. 3 Texas Tech University
    info
    Texas Tech University

    Lubbock, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/0405mnx93

    Geographic location of the organization Texas Tech University
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

ISSN: 1699-6003

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 56

Pages: 271-288

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/CUID.2020.56.19 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

Sustainable development goals

info

SDG classification obtained using Aurora SDG artificial intelligence model.

Abstract

Robotics has generated, over time, an enormous number of social imaginaries presents in plentiful cultural expressions. In the present work a preliminary analysis of these one is done to better understand the new social reality to which we can be subjected. Through a theoretical social analysis, we seek to investigate credible elements that we can find in a relatively close future. Specifically, we will focus on data offered by epigenetics and analyze possible future realities (consequences) based on this information.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso, A., Arzoz, I. (2003). Carta al homo ciberneticus. Madrid: Edaf
  • Aaltonen, M. (1997). The return to Multi-Causality. Journal of Futures Studies, 12(1): 81-86.
  • Ayyagari, R., Grover, V. y Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
  • Bannister, A.J. y Kouzarides, T. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research, 21(3), 381-395. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22
  • Bauman, Z. (2004). Modernidad líquida. Buenos Aires: FCE.
  • Beriain, J. (2005). Modernidades en disputa. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Bury, J. (2009). La idea del progreso. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Cao-Lei, L., de Rooij, S.R., King, S., Matthews, S.G., Metz, G.A.S., Roseboom, T.J. y Szyf, M. (2017). Prenatal stress and epigenetics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, (In Press). Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.016.
  • Chung, E., Cromby, J., Papadopoulos, D. y Tufarelli, C. (2016). Social Epigenetics: A Science of Social Science?. The Sociological Review, 64(1), suppl, 168–185. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/2059-7932.12019
  • Coca, J.R. (2011). Comprensión social de la biotecnología. Análisis de los imaginarios sociales desde una perspectiva de análisis integracionista. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española.
  • Coca, J.R. y Barrientos-Rastrojo, J. (2014). Aplicación de la verosimilitud analógica al progreso científico. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 19(65), 65-74.
  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology. Technology in Society, 52, 4-9. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.002.
  • Decker, M. (2017). Too Early or Too Late? The Assessment of Emerging Technology. In: Heil, R.; Seitz, S.B.; König, H. & Robienski, J. (Eds.) Epigenetics. Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (pp. 31-40). Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer VS.
  • Domínguez-Alcon, C. 2017. Ética del cuidado y robots. Cultura de los cuidados, año XXI, nº 47, pp. 9-13. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2017.47.01
  • Dreher, A; Gaston, N y Martens, P (2010). Measuring Globalisation. Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.
  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
  • Endreß, M. (2016). On the Very Idea of Social Construction: Deconstructing Searle’s and Hacking’s Critical Reflections. Human Studies, 39, 127-146.
  • Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P. Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S.H., Halpern, M.E., Ukomadu, C., Sadler, K.C., Pradhan, S., Pellegrini, M. y Jacobsen, S. E. (2010). Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 107(19), 8689-8694. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002720107
  • Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D., & Bernstein, E. (2007). Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell, 128(4), 635-638. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006
  • Goll, M. G. y Bestor, T. H. (2005). Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 74, 481-514. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.010904.153721
  • Hubbard, R. y Wald, E. (1999). El mito del gen. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Lee, R.S. (1970). Social attitudes and computer revolution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 53-59.
  • Malaska, P (2001). A futures research outline of a post-modern idea of progress. Futures, 33, 225-243. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00069-0
  • Meloni, M. (2014). How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, 62, 593-614. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12151
  • Navajas, S. (2016). El hombre tecnológico y el síndrome Blade Runner. En la era del biorobot. Córdoba, Benerice.
  • Niiniluoto, I (1984). Is Science Progressive?. Dordrecht: Riedel.
  • Nimrod, G. (2018). Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging & Mental Health, 22(8), 1080-1087. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037
  • Norma, D.A. (2010). El diseño de los objetos del futuro. La interacción entre el hombre y la máquina. Madrid: Paidós.
  • Peschansky, V. J. y Wahlestedt, C. (2014). Non-coding RNAs as direct and indirect modulators of epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics, 9(1), 3-12. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.27473
  • Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research?. Futures, 43, 618-626. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001
  • Rescher, N. (1999). Razón y valores en la Era científico-tecnológica. Barcelona: Paidós-ICE/UAB.
  • Salanova, M. (2003). Trabajando con tecnologías y afrontando el tecnoestrés: el rol de las creencias de eficacia. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 19(3), 225-246.
  • Sardar, Z. y Sweeny, J.A. (2016). The Three Tomorrows of Postnormal Times. Futures, 75, 1-13. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.004
  • Smith, R. J., Arnaud, P. y Kelsey, G. (2004). Identification and properties of imprinted genes and their control elements. Cytogenetics and Genome Research, 105(2-4), 335-345. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1159/000078206
  • Stankiewicz, A.M.; Swiergiel, A.H. y Lisowski, P. (2013). Epigenetics of stress adaptations in the brain. Brain Research Bulletin, 98, 76-92. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.07.003.
  • Strait, D., Grine FE. y Fleagle, JG. (2015). Analyzing hominin phylogeny: Cladistic approach. In: Enke, W. & Tattersall, I. (Eds.) Handbook of Paleoanthropology (pp. 1989-2014). Verlag/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B.S., y Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  • Tarafdar, M., Pullins E.B. y Ragu-Nathan. T. S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25, 103–132. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
  • Verona, R. I., Mann, M. R. y Bartolomei, M. S. (2003). Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 19, 237-259. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.092717
  • Walter, J. y Hümpel, A. (2017). Introduction to Epigenetics. In: Heil, R.; Seitz, S.B.; König, H. y Robienski, J. (Eds.) Epigenetics. Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (pp. 11-30). Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer.
  • Weinberger, N.; Decker, M.; Fleischer, T. y Schippl, J. (2013). A new monitoring process of future topics for innovation and technological analysis: informing Germanys' innovation policy. European Journal of Futures Research 1: 15-23. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0023-4
  • Weiss, A.; Igelsböck, J.; Wurhofer, D. y Tscheligi, M. (2011). Looking Forward to a “Robotic Society”?. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3 (2), 111-123. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0076-5
  • Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P. y Zilberman, D. (2010). Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science, 328(5980), 916-919. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186366
Data source: Dialnet