Hugo Grociola guerra por medio del derecho

  1. Peña Echeverría, Francisco Javier
Journal:
Araucaria: Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales
  1. Espinosa Antón, Francisco Javier (coord.)

ISSN: 2340-2199 1575-6823

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 16

Issue: 32

Pages: 69-92

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12795/ARAUCARIA.2014.I32.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Araucaria: Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales

Abstract

Grotius's position on war is considered in this article as an attempt to mediate between political realism and moralistic pacifism. Although war is an inevitable consequence of the permanent conflict in human relations, it can be adjusted to the principles and rules of common natural law and ius gentium resulting from the consensus among peoples. Consequently, Grotius outlines the conditions for justification of war and proposes rules of conduct in war. However, an insurmountable tension persists between moral and law normative claims, on one hand, and the logic of force essential to war, on the other.

Bibliographic References

  • Bull, Hedley (1990): The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations, en Bull, Kingsbury y Roberts, eds., pp. 64-93.
  • Bull, Hedley (2005): La sociedad anárquica. Madrid, Los Libros de la Catarata.
  • Bull, Hedley, Benedict Kingsbury and Adam Roberts (1990): Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Cavallar, Georg (2002): The Rights of Strangers. Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community and Political Justice since Vitoria. Vermont, Ashgate.
  • Cavallar, Georg (2011): Imperfect Cosmopolis. Studies in the History or International Legal Theory and Cosmopolitan Ideas. Cardiff, University of Wales Press.
  • Donelan, Michael (1983): Grotius and the Image of War. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 12, nº 3, pp. 233-243.
  • Draper, G. I. A. D. (1990): Grotius’ Place in the Development of Legal Ideas about War en Bull, Kingsbury y Roberts, eds., pp. 177-207.
  • Haakonsen, Knud (1985): Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought. Political Theory, vol. 13, nº 2, pp. 239-265.
  • Haggenmacher, Peter(1983): Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. París, Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Kolb, Robert (1997). Sur l’origine du couple terminologique ius ad bellum/ ius in bello. Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge, 827. (Disponible en http://www. icrc.org/fre/resources/documents/misc/5fzh8x.htm).
  • Lauterpacht, H. (1946): The Grotian Tradition in International Law. The British Yearbook of International Law, 23, pp. 1-53.
  • Nabulsi, Karma (1999): An ideology of war, not peace: ius in bello and the Grotian tradition of war. Journal of Political Ideologies, 4 (I), pp. 13-37).
  • Schmitt, Carl (2002): El Nomos de la Tierra en el Derecho de Gentes del “Ius publicum europeum”. Granada, Comares.
  • Straumann, Benjamin (2006): The Right of Punish as Just Cause of War in Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law, 2, www.historyofethics.org, 1-21.
  • Tuck, Richard (1993): Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Tuck, Richard (1999): The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Van Ittersum, Martine Julia (2006): Profit and Principle. Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies (1595-1615). Leiden, Brill.
  • Vincent, R. J. (1990): Grotius, Human Rights and Intervention en Bull, Kingsbury y Roberts, eds., pp. 241-256.
  • Zarka, Yves-Charles (1998): Philosophie et politique à l’âge classique. París, P. U. F.