Combining the Knowledge Appropriation Model and epistemic networks to understand co-creation and adoption of learning designs using log data

  1. Rodríguez-Triana, María Jesús 1
  2. Prieto, Luis P. 1
  3. Ley, Tobias 1
  4. Gillet, Denis 2
  5. de Jong, Ton 3
  1. 1 Tallinn University (Estonia)
  2. 2 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Switzerland)
  3. 3 Twente University (Netherlands)
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

ISSN: 1135-9250

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Codiseño de situaciones educativas enriquecidas con TIC

Número: 74

Páginas: 190-205

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.21556/EDUTEC.2020.74.1789 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

Resumen

Propuestas teóricas como el Modelo de Apropiación del Conocimiento (KAM) enfatizan el rol mediador de las prácticas sociales en la adopción de innovaciones educativas. Sin embargo, la falta de evidencia disponible sobre las prácticas diarias en el aula hace difícil comprender cómo los docentes adoptan nuevas pedagogías. En este sentido, los datos de registro de las herramientas de autoría y aprendizaje permiten estudiar el proceso de creación de diseños de aprendizaje que implementan una innovación educativa. Este artículo muestra cómo los modelos estadísticos y el análisis de redes epistémicas (ENA) permiten explorar patrones a gran escala en la co-creación y adopción de innovaciones educativas, utilizando KAM como marco teórico de dicho análisis. En concreto, presentamos un estudio de caso sobre Go-Lab, una iniciativa para promover el aprendizaje basado en la investigación en la escuela. Su herramienta de autoría y aprendizaje -Graasp- nos brinda una oportunidad única para rastrear, no sólo la (co)creación de diseños de aprendizaje, sino también su implementación en el aula. Este estudio de caso utiliza el enfoque metodológico antes mencionado para analizar el papel de las iniciativas de apoyo a gran escala en la co-creación y adopción de diseños de aprendizaje.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Buckingham Shum, S., Echeverria, V., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). The Multimodal Matrix as a quantitative ethnography methodology. International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography, 26–40. 10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_3
  • Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social Learning Analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 3–26.
  • Cai Z., Siebert-Evenstone A., Eagan B., Shaffer D.W., Hu X., Graesser A.C. (2019) nCoder+: A Semantic Tool for Improving Recall of nCoder Coding. In: Eagan B., Misfeldt M., Siebert-Evenstone A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_4
  • Fuentes-Hurtado, M., & Martínez, J. G. (2019). Evaluación inicial del diseño de unidades didácticas STEM gamificadas con TIC. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 70, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.70.1469
  • Gaševic, D., Joksimovic, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003
  • Hernández-Leo, D., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Pardo, A., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., & Rodríguez-Triana, M. J. (2019). Analytics for learning design: A layered framework and tools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12645
  • Karumbaiah, S., Baker, R. S., Barany, A., & Shute, V. (2019). Using epistemic networks with automated codes to understand why players quit levels in a learning game. International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography, (106–116).
  • Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43 (2), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
  • Klamma, R. (2013). Community Learning Analytics – Challenges and Opportunities BT - Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013. In J.-F. Wang & R. Lau (Eds.) (pp. 284–293). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Leoste, J., Tammets, K., & Ley, T. (2019). Co-creating learning designs in professional teacher education: Knowledge appropriation in the teacher’s innovation laboratory. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 42, 131–163. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/42_7.pdf
  • Leung, W.-C. (2002). Why is evidence from ethnographic and discourse research needed in medical education: The case of problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 24 (2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220125268
  • Ley, T., Maier, R., Thalmann, S., Waizenegger, L., Pata, K., & Ruiz-Calleja, A. (2020). A knowledge appropriation model to connect scaffolded learning and knowledge maturation in workplace learning settings. Vocations and Learning, 13 (1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09231-2
  • Michos K, Hernández-Leo D. Understanding collective behavior of learning design communities. In: Verbert K, Sharples M, Klobučar T T. Adaptive and adaptable learning. Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL); 2016 Sept. 13-16; Lyon, France. Springer; 2016. p. 614-7. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9891). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_75
  • Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46 (2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12273
  • Rodríguez-Triana M.J., Holzer A., Vozniuk A., Gillet D. (2015) Orchestrating Inquiry-Based Learning Spaces: An Analysis of Teacher Needs. In: Li F., Klamma R., Laanpere M., Zhang J., Manjón B., Lau R. (Eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning -- ICWL 2015. ICWL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9412. Springer, Cham. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_12
  • Rodríguez-Triana, M.J, Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., De Jong, T., & Gillet, D. (2019). Tracing teacher collaborative learning and innovation adoption: A case study in an inquiry learning platform. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoue, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings - 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2019 - Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 432-439). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://www.cscl2019.com/upload/pdf/CSCL-2019-Volume-1.pdf
  • Ruiz-Calleja, A., Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., & Dennerlein, S. (2017). Learning analytics for professional and workplace learning: A literature review. In Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education - 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2017, Proceedings (Vol. 10474 LNCS, pp. 164-178). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 10474 LNCS). Springer Verlag Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_13
  • Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart press.
  • Shaffer, D. W., & Serlin, R. C. (2004). What good are statistics that don’t generalize? Educational Researcher, 33(9), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033009014
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Vuorikari R. et al. (2011) ICT-Based School Collaboration, Teachers’ Networks and their Opportunities for Teachers’ Professional Development - A Case Study on eTwinning. In: Leung H., Popescu E., Cao Y., Lau R.W.H., Nejdl W. (Eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2011. ICWL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7048. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_12
  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet