Aprendizaje expandido: Gestión de una comunidad de práctica online para educadores físicos

  1. Alfonso García Monge 1
  2. Nicolás Julio Bores Calle 1
  3. Lucio Martínez Álvarez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

ISSN: 1577-0354

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 22

Número: 88

Páginas: 765-786

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15366/RIMCAFD2022.88.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

Resumen

A través de un estudio de caso, se indaga en las tensiones detectadas en el diseño y gestión de una comunidad de práctica online de profesorado de Educación Física. El marco conceptual usado en la discusión es el “Aprendizaje Expandido” (Engreström). Se constata un modelo de cinco fases. En la fase 1, las tensiones se dan entre las ideas de los propios diseñadores; en la fase 2, entre las ideas y las posibilidades tecnológicas; en la fase 3, las tensiones surgen entre las ideas de los desarrolladores, las prácticas y las necesidades de los participantes; en la fase 4, continúa la tensión entre desarrolladores y prácticas, mediatizadas por la incorporación de nuevos gestores que provienen de la comunidad de práctica; y, finalmente, en la fase 5, los diseñadores y gestores van retirándose del primer plano de la plataforma y su ideas iniciales acaban disolviéndose entre las de la comunidad

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anand, N., Gardner, H. & Morris, T. (2007). Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2), 406–428.
  • Barab, S. A.; MaKinster, J. G. & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing System Dualities. Characterizing an Online Professional Development Community. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp.53-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.007
  • Bock, G.W.; Zmud, R.W.; Kim, Y.G. & Lee, J.N., (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed Leadership in Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100301
  • Bonneau, C. (2013). Contradictions and their concrete manifestations: and activitytheoretical analysis of the intra-organizational co-configuration of open source software. In Proceedings from 29th EGOS Colloquium, Sub-theme, volume 50.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0643/ca66954cd179a498e3c4773502565cc39196.pdf
  • Bores Calle, N. (ed.) (2005). La lección de Educación Física en el Tratamiento Pedagógico de lo Corporal. Barcelona: INDE.
  • Bores-García, D.; González-Calvo, G. y García-Monge, A. (2018). Barreras y motivaciones para la participación en una CdP de docentes de EF. Ágora para la Educación Física y el Deporte, 20 (3), 368-391.
  • Blumer, H. (1982 [1954]), El interaccionismo simbólico perspectiva y método. Barcelona: Hora S.A.
  • Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12 (2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
  • Bruckman, A. & Jensen, C. (2004). The Mystery of the Death of MediaMOO: Seven Years of Evolution o an Online Community. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (eds.), Building Virtual Communities. Learning and Change in Cyberspace (pp. 21-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chua, C.E.H. (2009). Why Do Virtual Communities Regulate Speech?. Communication Monographs, 76 (2), 234-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828420
  • Contu, A. & Willmott, H. (2000). Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in practice: A delicate flower in the organizacional learning field. Organization 7 (2), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072004
  • Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.
  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/347634.348775
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Making expansive decisions: An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In C. M. Allwood, & M. Selart (Eds.), Decision making: Social and creative dimensions (281- 301). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_14
  • Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410521477
  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5 (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2016). Expansive learning on the move: insights from ongoing research. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39 (3), 401-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2016.1189119
  • Elster, J. (2003). Tuercas y Tornillos. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Flick, U., 2010. An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Fombrun, C. J. (2003). Atribuciones de poder a través de una red social. En F. Requena Santos (ed.), Análisis de redes sociales. Orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones (pp.399-416). Madrid: CIS.
  • Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37 (6), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 6486.00207
  • García-Monge, A., Bores-Calle, N.J., Martínez-Álvarez, L., & del Val-Martín, P. (2014). Developing an on-line Profesional Network of Physical Education Practice Analysis. A Case of 'MultiScopic'. Paper presented at the ECER Portugal 2014, Oporto.
  • García-Monge, A.; González-Calvo, G. & Bores-García, D. (2018). ‘I like the idea but…’: the gap in participation in a virtual community of practice for analysing physical education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 34(3), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1505486
  • Glasser, B. and Strauss, A., 2006. The discovery of grounded theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
  • Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidos.
  • Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2002). What makes learning networks effective? Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.505273
  • Iaquinto, B.; Ison, R. & Faggian, R. (2011). Creating communities of practice: scoping purposeful design. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111108666
  • Kaulback, B. & Bergtholdt, D. (2008). Holding the virtual space. In C. Kimble & P. Hildreth (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (pp. 25-43). Greenwich: Information Age.
  • Koch, M. & Fusco, J. (2008). Designing for growth: Enabling communities of practice to develop and extend their work online. In C. Kimble & P. Hildreth (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (pp.1- 23). Greenwich: Information Age.
  • Lai, K.W. (2013): Knowledge construction in online learning communities: a case study of a doctoral course, Studies in Higher Education. Published online, retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.831402
  • Lai, K.W.; Pratt, L.; Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006). Literature review and synthesis: Online communities of practice. Research Division, Ministry of Education, New Zealand. Recuperado de http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/curriculum/5795
  • Lantz-Andersson, A.; Lundin, M. & Selwyn, N. (2018): Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informallydeveloped professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  • Lewellen, T. C. (2009). Introducción a la antropología política. Barcelona: Ediciones Bellaterra.
  • Miles, A. M. & Huberman, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Mak, B. & Pun, S.H. (2015). Cultivating a teacher community of practice for sustainable professional development: beyond planned efforts. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 21(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928120
  • Martínez Álvarez, L.; Bores Calle, N.; García Monge, A.; Barbero González, J.I.; Vaca Escribano, M.; Abardía Colás, F.; Hernández Martín, A.; Miguel Aguado, A.; & Rodríguez Campazas, H. (2009). Una perspectiva escolar sobre la Educación Física: buscando procesos y entornos educadores. En L. Martínez Álvarez & R. Gómez (coord.), La Educación Física y el deporte en Edad escolar: el giro reflexivo en la enseñanza (pp.137-167). Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
  • Martínez-Álvarez, L., & Vaca Escribano, M. (1997). Tratamiento pedagógico de lo corporal: historia de un grupo con vocación de compartir y crear una cultura profesional que dé respuesta a la dimensión motriz y corporal de la educación. Comunicación presentada en el III Simposium internacional sobre investigación-acción y prácticas educativas críticas, Valladolid.
  • Merton, R. K. (1980[1949]). Sobre las teorías sociológicas de alcance intermedio. En Teoría y estructura sociales (pp.471-504). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
  • Ngulube, P. (2015). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation: systematic search for meaning. In E.R. Mathipa & M.T. Gumbo (eds). Addressing research challenges: making headway for developing researchers. Mosala-MASEDI Publishers & Booksellers cc: Noordywk, pp. 131-156.
  • Pallof, R.M. y Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Wiley.
  • Pearce, C. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, E. A. (2007). Shared leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 281-288.
  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds.2000.100.9.459.3
  • Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability: Twenty years of chatting online. Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20, 5, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683
  • Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette, Empathy and Trust in Communities of Practice: Steppingstones to Social Capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10 (3), 294-302.
  • Probst, G. & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
  • Purvis, R.L.; Sambamurthy, V. & Zmud, R.W. (2001). The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Study, Organization Science, 12 (2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.117.10115
  • Raelin, J. (2003). Creating leaderful organizations: How to bring out leadership in everyone. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Rhoades, J.L. & Woods, A. (2013). Self-Organized Communities of Practice in Physical Education, Quest, 65 (1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.727371
  • Riverin, S. & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study. Journal of Distance Education, Revue de L’Éducation à Distance, 22 (2), 43-58.
  • Schlager, M.S.; Fusco, J. & Schank, P. (2004). Evolution of an Online Education Community of Practice. En K.A. Renninger & W.Shumar (Eds.). Building Virtual Communities (pp. 129-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606373.010
  • Schön, D. (1998). El profesional reflexivo. Cómo piensan los profesores cuando actúan. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Shkedi, A., 2004. Second-order theoretical analysis: a method for constructing theoretical Explanation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17 (5), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839042000253630
  • Stake, R.E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata.
  • Stake, R.E. (2010). Qualitative Research. Studying How Things Work. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Trust, T. & Horrocks, B. (2017). ‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher profesional growth within a blended community of practice. Professional Development in Education, 43 (4), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1233507
  • Victor, B. & Boynton, A.C. (1998). Invented Here: Maximizing Your Organization’s Internal Growth and Profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Wegener, R. & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Virtual Learning Communities: Success Factors and Challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL), 5/6 (4), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051814
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932