Reusing IMS-LD Formalized Best Practices in Collaborative Learning Structuring
- Hernández-Leo, D. 1
- Aseniso-Pérez, J.I. 1
- Dimitriadis, Y. 1
- Bote-Lorenzo, M.L. 1
- Jorrín-Abellán, I.M. 1
- Villasclaras-Fernández, E.D. 1
-
1
Universidad de Valladolid
info
ISSN: 1710-2251
Año de publicación: 2005
Volumen: 2
Número: 4
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Advanced Technology for Learning
Resumen
Designs of CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning)/nactivities should be flexible, effective and customizable to/nparticular learning situations. On the other hand, structured/ndesigns aim to create favourable conditions for learning. Thus,/nthis paper proposes the collection of representative and broadly/naccepted (best practices) structuring techniques in collaborative learning. With the aim of establishing a conceptual common ground among collaborative learning practitioners and software/ndevelopers, and reusing the expertise that best practices/nrepresent, the paper also proposes the formulation of these techniques as patterns: the so-called CLFPs (Collaborative/nLearning Flow Patterns). To formalize these patterns, we have/nchosen the educational modelling language IMS Learning Design (IMS-LD). IMS-LD has the capability to specify many of the collaborative characteristics of the CLFPs. Nevertheless, the language bears limited capability for describing the services that mediate interactions within a learning activity and the specification of temporal or rotated roles. This analysis is/ndiscussed in the paper, as well as our approaches towards the/ndevelopment of a system capable of integrating tools using IMSLD/nscripts and a CLFP-based Learning Design authoring tool.
Referencias bibliográficas
- [1] A. Dimitracopoulou & A. Petrou, Advanced collaborativedistance learning systems for young students: Design issuesand current trends on new cognitive and metacognitive tools,THEMES in Education International Journal, 2005, (in press).
- Dillenbourg, (1999), UK: Elsevier Science
- 10.1145/153571.255960
- Dimitriadis, (2003), A. Martínez-Monés
- Dillenbourg, (2002), in P.A. Kirschner(Ed.)
- 10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_6
- [7] IMS learning design v1.0 final specification, available at http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign, last visited: 2004.
- 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357434
- Dalziel, (2003), 2003
- [10] RELOAD, Reusable elearning object authoring & deliveryproject website, available at http://www.reload.ac.uk/, lastvisited: 2004.
- [11] P. Karampiperis & D. Sampson, Designing learning servicesfor open learning systems utilizing learning design, Proc.4th IASTED Int. Conf. Web-based Education, Grindelwald,Switzerland, 2005, 279–284.
- [12] CopperAuthor project website, available at http://www.copperauthor.org/, last visited: 2005.
- [13] Coppercore project website, available at http://www.coppercore.org /, last visited: 2004.
- [14] T. Vantroys & Y. Peter, COW, a flexible platform for theenactment of learning scenarios, Proc. 9th Int. Workshop onGroupware, Grenoble, France, 2003, 168–182. (Lecture Notesin Computer Science, 2806)
- Bote-Lorenzo, (2004), G. Vega-Gorgojo
- 10.1145/192844.192878
- [17] Doing CL website, available at http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/CL1/CL/doingcl/DCL1.asp, last visited: 2004.
- [18] IMS content packaging v1.1.4 final specification, availableat http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging, last visited:2004.
- 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357478
- Miao, (2005), CSCLscripts: Modelling features and potential use
- [21] J.A. Marcos-García, A. Martínez-Monés, & Y. Dimitriadis,The role of roles in the analysis of interactions in collaborativeenvironments, Proc. 16th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, workshop: Artificial Intelligence in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Valencia, Spain, 2004, 23–35.
- 10.1109/MC.2002.1009167
- 10.1145/944217.944233
- [23] M.P. Papazoglou & D. Georgakopoulos, Service-oriented computing, Communications of the ACM, 46 (10), 2003, 25–28.
- [24] TELL project website, available at http://cosy.ted.unipi.gr/tell/, last visited: 2005.