Justicia y confianza claves para el intercambio de conocimiento en los grupos de investigación en la universidad

  1. Roberto Hernández-Soto 1
  2. Mónica Gutiérrez-Ortega 2
  3. Bartolomé Rubia-Avi 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de investigación y docencia creativa

ISSN: 2254-5883

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 12

Páginas: 271-281

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.82320 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de investigación y docencia creativa

Resumen

El propósito de este estudio es analizar la influencia de la justicia y la confianza en el intercambio de conocimiento entre los miembros de un equipo de investigación de una universidad española. Se ha realizado un estudio cualitativo basado en entrevistas semiestructuradas (n=19) destinadas a conocer el efecto de la confianza y la justicia en el intercambio de conocimiento y la participación en un grupo de investigación de una universidad pública española. Se codificaron datos cualitativos en categorías. Se identificaron 5 categorías: (1) Confianza en los miembros del equipo, (2) Confianza en la dirección, (3) Justicia informacional, (4) Justicia procedimental e (5) Intención. Los resultados sugieren que cuando los miembros confían en la dirección y en los miembros del equipo y están informados sobre los asuntos de su interés, sobre las decisiones y sobre cómo se han tomado, se crea un ambiente que promueve el intercambio de conocimiento. Las universidades pueden mejorar la participación del profesorado en los grupos de investigación promoviendo acciones que favorezcan la confianza tanto entre sus miembros como con los investigadores principales que los lideran y fomentando procesos tanto de gestión como de distribución de la información en los que destaque la transparencia.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akosile, A, & Olatokun, W (2020). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among academics in Bowen University, Nigeria. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2), 410-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618820926
  • Al-Alawi, AI, Al-Marzooqi, NY, & Mohammed, YF (2007). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: Critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738898
  • Al-Kurdi, OF, El-Haddadeh, R, & Eldabi, T (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018
  • Al-Kurdi, O, El-Haddadeh, R, & Eldabi, T (2018). Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(2), 226-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2017-0129
  • Ardichvili, A (2008). Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308319536
  • Argote, L (2013). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  • Asrar-ul-Haq, M, & Anwar, S (2016). A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1127744. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744
  • Charband, Y, & Navimipour, NJ (2018). Knowledge sharing mechanisms in the education: A systematic review of the state-ofthe-art literature and recommendations for future research. Kybernetes, 47(7), 1456-1490. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2017-0227
  • Chiu, CM, Hsu, MH, & Wang, ETG (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  • Cropanzano, R, Bowen, DE, & Gilliland, SW (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34-48.
  • D’Eredita, MA, & Barreto, C (2006), How does tacit knowledge proliferate? An episode-based perspective. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1821-1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067666
  • Davenport, TH, & Prusak, L (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dokhtesmati, M, & Bousari, RG (2013). Knowledge Sharing in Iranian academic institutions: Metaanalysis approach. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.065
  • Elrehail, H, Emeagwali, OL, Alsaad, A, & Alzghoul, A (2018). the impact of Transformational and Authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 55-67.
  • Ensign, P, & Hebert, L (2010). How reputation affects knowledge sharing among colleagues. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 79.
  • Fang, YH, & Chiu, CM (2010). In justice we trust: Exploring knowledge-sharing continuance intentions in virtual communities of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.005
  • Fauzi, MA, Nya-Ling, CT, Thurasamy, R, Ojo, AO, & Shogar, I (2019a). Muslim academics’ knowledge sharing in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(2), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0111
  • Fauzi, MA, Tan, CNL, Thurasamy, R, & Ojo, AO (2019b). Evaluating academics’ knowledge sharing intentions in Malaysian public universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.7
  • Fernie, S, Green, SD, Weller, SJ, & Newcombe, R (2003). Knowledge sharing: context, confusion, and controversy. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00092-3
  • Fullwood, R, Rowley, J, & McLean, J (2018). Exploring the factors that influence knowledge sharing between academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(8) 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1448928
  • García-Sánchez, P, Díaz-Díaz, NL, & De Saá-Pérez, P (2019). Social capital and knowledge sharing in academic research teams. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316689140
  • Glesne, C (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Goh, SK, & Sandhu, MS (2013). Knowledge Sharing Among Malaysian Academics: Influence of Affective Commitment and Trust. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 38-48. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/975
  • Haynes, B. (2011) The Impact of Generational Differences on the Workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136812
  • Hernández-Soto, R, Rodríguez-Medina, J, & Gutiérrez-Ortega, M (2020). Confianza e intercambio de conocimiento en una comunidad de práctica transdisciplinar: un caso de estudio convergente paralelo. Revista Latinoamericana De Tecnología Educativa RELATEC, 19(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.19.2.47
  • Hernández-Soto, R, Gutiérrez-Ortega, M, & Rubia-Avi, B (2021a). Key factors in knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities of practice: a systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22715
  • Hernández-Soto, R, Gutiérrez-Ortega, M, & Rubia-Avi, B (2021b). ¿Por qué los profesores comparten conocimiento sobre su práctica?: una revisión sistemática sobre las comunidades de práctica. En M Anxo Santos Rego et al. (coord.) La educación en Red. Realidades diversas, horizontes comunes, 740-741.
  • Hernández-Soto, R, Gutiérrez-Ortega, M, & Rubia-Avi, B (2023). ¿Qué comparten los académicos de un grupo de investigación? Un caso de estudio crítico. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 26(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.559611
  • Hislop, D, Bosua, R, & Helms, R (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Husted, K, & Michailova, S (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00902616(02)00072-4
  • Iqbal, MJ, Rasli, A, Heng, LH, Ali, MBB, Hassan, I, & Jolaee, A (2011). Academic staff knowledge sharing intentions and university innovation capability. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11051-11059. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.576
  • Jolaee, A, Nor, KM, Khani, N, & Yusoff, RM (2014). Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(4), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041
  • Kim, S, & Ju, B (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library and Information Science Research, 30(4), 282- 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.003
  • Kim, S, & Lee, H (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge sharing capabilities. Public administration review, 66(3), 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
  • Koranteng, FN, & Wiafe, I (2019). Factors that promote knowledge sharing on academic social networking sites: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1211-1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9825-0
  • Kwon, SJ, Park, E, & Kim, KJ (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.04.005
  • Leahey, E (2016). From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual review of sociology, 42, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219
  • Leahey, E, Beckman, CM, & Stanko, TL (2017). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 105-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216665364
  • Majewski, G, Usoro, A, & Khan, I (2011). Knowledge sharing in immersive virtual communities of practice. VINE, 41(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721111115548
  • Mansor, ZD, & Saparudin, IN (2015). Motivational factors for academicians in private universities to participate in knowledgesharing activities. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 23(SI January), 101-116.
  • Mason, C, Castleman, T, & Parker, CM (2008). Socio-technical factors influencing channel use for knowledge-sharing in regional SME networks. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 2(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2008.018794
  • Mayer, RC, Davis, JH, & Schoorman, FD (2006). An integrative model of organizational trust. In RM Kramer (Ed.), Organizational trust: A reader (pp. 82-108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Miles, MB, Huberman, AM, & Saldaña, J (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.
  • Pezzoni, M, Sterzi, V, & Lissoni, F (2012). Career progress in centralized academic systems: Social capital and institutions in France and Italy. Research Policy, 41(4), 704-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.009
  • Phung, VD, Hawryszkiewycz, I, Chandran, D, & Ha, BM (2019). Promoting Knowledge Sharing Amongst Academics: A Case Study from Vietnam. Journal of Information y Knowledge Management, 18(03), 1950032. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649219500321
  • Ramayah, T, Yeap, JA, & Ignatius, J (2014). Assessing knowledge sharing among academics: A validation of the knowledge sharing behavior scale (KSBS). Evaluation review, 38(2), 160-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14539685
  • Saldaña, J (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.
  • Stvilia, B, Hinnant, CC, Schindler, K, Worrall, A, Burnett, G, Burnett, K, Kazmer, MM, & Marty, PF (2011). Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. Journal of the American Society for Information, Science and Technology, 62(2), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21464
  • Tabatabaei, M, Afrazeh, A, & Seifi, A (2019). A game theoretic analysis of knowledge sharing behavior of academics: Bi-level programming application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.031
  • Tseng, FC, & Kuo, FY (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
  • Usoro, A, & Majewski, G (2011). Intensive knowledge sharing: Finnish Laurea lab case study. VINE, 41(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721111115520
  • Usoro, A, Sharratt, MW, Tsui, E, & Shekhar, S (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(3), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
  • Van Rijnsoever, FJ, & Hessels, LK (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
  • Wang, HK, Yen, YF, & Tseng, JF (2015). Knowledge sharing in knowledge workers: The roles of social exchange theory and the theory of planned behavior. Innovation, 17(4), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1129283
  • Wang, S, & Noe, R (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  • Wenger, E, McDermont, R, & Snyder, WM (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Wu, LW, & Lin, JR (2013). Knowledge sharing and knowledge effectiveness: learning orientation and co-production in the contingency model of tacit knowledge. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(8), 672-686. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM04-2011-0050
  • Yang, JT (2009). Individual attitudes to learning and sharing individual and organizational knowledge in the hospitality industry. Services Industries Journal, 29(2), 1723-1743. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902793490
  • Zhu, YQ (2017). Why and how knowledge sharing matters for R&D engineers. R&D Management, 47(2), 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12188
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet